Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

that one is defs a 2.8, asking for ya boi vims see if there is a graph for a 6870 on a 26

Think it made over 800rwhp for about 3000rpm which is just silly!

Not sure on a 2.6L, it would shit out power but be fairly laggy. Doesn't vims want a track car?

Think it made over 800rwhp for about 3000rpm which is just silly!

Not sure on a 2.6L, it would shit out power but be fairly laggy.

Id agree with that, some good results happening on 3.0L and 3.2 stroker kits with the 6870 from what im seeing around.

Could be OK for a 2.6 if a small enough rear housing is selected, but it would be a issue up top end when at song. (depending on how hard you pushed it)

Very very nice mate must come on song strong !

6466 is still my fav turbo, seen results range from 500- to over 600kw

No need for dirty big 6870's and 7175's etc

Haven't got it back yet. Imagine it would push towards 600 with another 3-5psi like other results I've seen.

Definitely a good choice for E85.

Do you have a dyno graph or 38psi 2nismo?

I saw a dyno result of a 6870 on a 2.6 today with cams, low 30ish boost, make mid 500'sKw, was as laggy as hell, not very impressed, looked like a slug to drive on the street, nothing then all.

Seen a few like this so far on 2.6's, seems like the 6870 is more towards the extra 15% capacity that a 3.0L or stroker delivers.

Looks like 2.6's run a larger area under the curve on the 6466....

Do you have a dyno graph or 38psi 2nismo?

I saw a dyno result of a 6870 on a 2.6 today with cams, low 30ish boost, make mid 500'sKw, was as laggy as hell, not very impressed, looked like a slug to drive on the street, nothing then all.

Seen a few like this so far on 2.6's, seems like the 6870 is more towards the extra 15% capacity that a 3.0L or stroker delivers.

Looks like 2.6's run a larger area under the curve on the 6466....

It's a 1100hp turbo on a 2.6L, it was never going to be responsive. I would say my 6262 is right in the sweet spot for a 2.6L non drag application but it's rated at 705hp.

6466 would be a good all rounder for a 2.8L and a 6870 isn't too bad from what I have seen but more towards a drag power band.

It's a 1100hp turbo on a 2.6L, it was never going to be responsive. I would say my 6262 is right in the sweet spot for a 2.6L non drag application but it's rated at 705hp.

6466 would be a good all rounder for a 2.8L and a 6870 isn't too bad from what I have seen but more towards a drag power band.

I completely agree, 6262 or BW EFR 8374 is the biggest I would go on a real streetcar, up to 3.0L. I wonder how far off the compressor maps the 2.6 is with some of these giants? And I guess I will keep wondering because Precision doesn't need no stinkin' compressor maps!

Edited by HarrisRacing

Do you have a dyno graph or 38psi 2nismo?

I saw a dyno result of a 6870 on a 2.6 today with cams, low 30ish boost, make mid 500'sKw, was as laggy as hell, not very impressed, looked like a slug to drive on the street, nothing then all.

Seen a few like this so far on 2.6's, seems like the 6870 is more towards the extra 15% capacity that a 3.0L or stroker delivers.

Looks like 2.6's run a larger area under the curve on the 6466....

No point until it has enough injector. Then you'll see the whole thing. Ethanol and a torque converter fill the hole that might otherwise be there with a petrol/manual.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...