Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Thinking of putting a forward facing plenem on my rb25

looking at gettting either a plazmaman or greddy one..??

Any experience, and or advice, iz it worth it, there performance or dificalty putting them in ect..

Would be great..

Cheers Troy..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/315700-plazmaman-plenem-vs-greddy/
Share on other sites

Hi Troy,

I have this conversation with many customers and we have tested both back to back to determine the pros and cons. The main difference is that the Plazmaman retains the standard runners, where the Greddy has shorter runners incorperated into the unit. This design feature of the Greddy in simple terms, creates more top end power at the expense of mid range torque. The longer factory runners helps bring boost on at an earlier rpm (have seen 300-500rpm better spool!!!) so if you want your turbo to spool faster, make more useable mid range power/torque but miss out on a little bit of peak hp, then the Plazmaman is for you. If you only care about the number on the dyno, get the Greddy.

I would sell 20 plazmaman plenums for every Greddy unit.

NB: Do not buy a Greddy copy unless you have a guarantee from your supplier that is will not leak coolant. We had a number of customer supplied copies that were nothing but trouble and cost the customer heaps more by the time it was fitted.

Hope this helps, if you have any questions feel free to PM me any time.

Cheers,

Trent Whyte

MERCURY MOTORSPORT

  • Like 1

Unfortunately not (we generally go from standard straight to Hypertune (single throttle)), although I would expect there to not be a massive difference as the RB26 has short runners as standard so there isnt a dramatic difference like on the RB25.

Actually, an interesting point, is that an RB25 with a GT35R on it will achieve full boost earlier than an RB26 with the same turbo kit, even though the RB25 has a smaller capacity. This is a combination of the VVTi and also the longer runners on the inlet manifold of the RB25. The RB26 will probably make more peak power and it also has more revs to work with.

I did back to back with stock vs greddy. Same as above, the differance in mid-range was enormous.

Only thing greddy has going for it is the short cooler piping.

But that's where the palaz plenum comes in. If only it wasn't so expensive.

Hi Troy,

I have this conversation with many customers and we have tested both back to back to determine the pros and cons. The main difference is that the Plazmaman retains the standard runners, where the Greddy has shorter runners incorperated into the unit. This design feature of the Greddy in simple terms, creates more top end power at the expense of mid range torque. The longer factory runners helps bring boost on at an earlier rpm (have seen 300-500rpm better spool!!!) so if you want your turbo to spool faster, make more useable mid range power/torque but miss out on a little bit of peak hp, then the Plazmaman is for you. If you only care about the number on the dyno, get the Greddy.

I would sell 20 plazmaman plenums for every Greddy unit.

NB: Do not buy a Greddy copy unless you have a guarantee from your supplier that is will not leak coolant. We had a number of customer supplied copies that were nothing but trouble and cost the customer heaps more by the time it was fitted.

Hope this helps, if you have any questions feel free to PM me any time.

Cheers,

Trent Whyte

MERCURY MOTORSPORT

Good post!

Hi Trent

What gains have you seen with the Plazmaman plenum vs standard plenum?

Gains vary from car to car as there are usually a bunch of things that can be improved to improve performance. If I was to quote a figure, I would say 10-20kw is possible, however the more power you are making, the more effective the upgrade becomes. I wouldn't personally run out and get one for a car with a standard turbo, but as part of a well put together package, the plazmaman stuff works really really well.

We have a number of cars making big numbers with them. One is on a VC commodore that we are still developing that has a standard NEO RB25DET engine (plus a nitto dbs head gasket and arp studs) running a GT45R turbo on a 6Boost manifold and it is making 587hp @ wheels on 25psi (e85). The other is a RB25/30 with a GT4094R running 30psi on E85 making 633hp in a R32 GTST, which just ran a 10.4@135mph in full trim. Both of these cars use the plazmaman setup and both enjoy the response of the longer runners (yes the 45R is laggy, but we are fixing that with a ZEX nitrous spool kit!)

Just another little note, the RB25/30 with the GT40R is more responsive than a standard RB25 with a GT3076R and makes heaps more power!!! Just goes to show that bigger doesn't have to be laggier!!

Gains vary from car to car as there are usually a bunch of things that can be improved to improve performance. If I was to quote a figure, I would say 10-20kw i

Just another little note, the RB25/30 with the GT40R is more responsive than a standard RB25 with a GT3076R and makes heaps more power!!! Just goes to show that bigger doesn't have to be laggier!!

Hi Trent,

Thats a very interesting eye opener...I'm beginning a 25/30 build and was skewed to the GT3076R particularly because of all the feedback on the forum on this turbo on a 25 or 25/30. Would you mind sharing how early the GT40R comes on boost/full boost on a 25/30?

Cheers! :cool:

Hi Trent,

Thats a very interesting eye opener...I'm beginning a 25/30 build and was skewed to the GT3076R particularly because of all the feedback on the forum on this turbo on a 25 or 25/30. Would you mind sharing how early the GT40R comes on boost/full boost on a 25/30?

Cheers! :cool:

I will try and post up some graphs but it might take a little while....I have a bit on and I am a retard with the scanner! :(

At the end of the day, you need to choose a turbo that suits your goals. Don't pick one that people are raving about just because it is popular. Lets say for your build you might have a particular hp goal, or a full boost by XXXXrpm goal, so for your combination of parts that you are using, you need to pick a turbo that will perform how you want. EVERY PERSON IS DIFFERENT, so decide what is important to you and your goals, then work towards them. Hopefully you will get lots of advice from people like me, who do these modifications for a living. Our experience is your gain, so find a workshop that you feel comfortable with and give them as much information as you can and let them offer advice, examples of combinations they have done before and suggestions that can improve your setup. It will only aid your outcome.

I guess the other thing you need to remember is BE REALISTIC with your goals. If you want 500hp, then go for it. If you want 300hp, then thats fine too. Don't get caught up in the ego dyno graph challenge. At the end of the day, YOU need to live with the car, so it has to please you. My job is to recommend solutions that are suitable for you. We build the car for YOU, YOUR DREAM, not for us. Its a big difference.

We don't make millions of dollars in this industry, we do it more for the passion of it over just making money (trust me, I turned my back on a lucrative Engineering career to follow my passion of jap perf cars). So chances are, we love cars just as much as you, so we can talk about then non-stop, just like you. :)

good posts trent :cool:

one other thing that should be mentioned is that forward facing plenum(s) are more responsive than standard due to less piping involved

This is true for on/off/on throttle response. There is negligible difference when looking at dyno graphs at wide open throttle in terms of the boost line (unless the plenum has changed the result, not the piping).

I always wanted a Greddy plenum on my RB25 (hairstyles I guess) till I saw how well put together the Plazmaman stuff is and recognised how good the stock RB25 runners are for almost every application.

Interesting , I must have another look at Oyays RB25 plenum .

I imagine its a lot less involved than changing the whole manifold over and more easily reversed if needed for any reason .

For the record can the std throttle body be used in place of the pretty , expensive , one ?

Lastly the real "Greedy" one is quite expensive so the PM one must be real expensive .

I suppose you have to factor in the fitting antics of the GReady one so all up maybe similar ?

Cheers Adrian .

dont underestimate the greddy. I have egt sensors in my exhaust manifold and the tuner was very impressed with the evenness of the temperatures across the cylinder range. That tells me I am getting a good even fuel distribution across all 6 pots.

This is in no way a slight at the Plazmaman product, it may well do the same but i aint changing to find out.

Interesting , I must have another look at Oyays RB25 plenum .

I imagine its a lot less involved than changing the whole manifold over and more easily reversed if needed for any reason .

For the record can the std throttle body be used in place of the pretty , expensive , one ?

Lastly the real "Greedy" one is quite expensive so the PM one must be real expensive .

I suppose you have to factor in the fitting antics of the GReady one so all up maybe similar ?

Cheers Adrian .

greedy one bolts on as well with everything suppied

I had a looky here .

http://www.plazmaman.com/shop/index.php?ac...m&itemId=17

Does anyone here have closer pics of the Plasmaman plenum , I'd like to see where the fittings and IAC assembly goes .

I reckon if I got one I'd want it in innocent flat black .

I did ask recently about what size the std R33 25T TB is but cant remember .

On PMs manifold did your customers use anything larger than std and if so were there any negative results .

Just for the record my R33 has porting/OS exhaust valves/approx 9.2CR/Poncams/740 Nismos/PFC and a GT3076R 52T 0.82 A/R IW turbo to fit .

I like the sound of anything that improves an engines mid range so I'm all ears .

With a pipe kit and an OE GTR intercooler I'd like to have a reasonably responsive 270+ at the wheels .

Doable I think .

Gotta salt the Woolafs tail , cheers A .

Well it sounds like you have a smiliar setup to mine. Built head, Poncams etc.

My car makes boost quicker than any skyline I have been in.

As for the fittings. All fittings are down the middle (drivers side) and there is one on the passengers side. The other fittings for your brake booster, IAC etc are in near stock locations.

Edited by PM-R33

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...