Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys just got an idea I want to share with ya'll...

I've got a GFB Hybrid BOV on my X-Trail and it has a plumb-back configuration.

The idea is to somehow make a switch/circuit to activate the BOV or not.

So when the switch is at 'off' the BOV acts like there's no Vacuum line attached to it, and the turbo flutters its head off, then when its 'on', the BOV acts normal.

The reason behind it is I love a good flutter *cue the hatred*, I don't care how wanky it is, but I want at the flick of a switch, to have either a nice plumb-back sneeze, or a nice flutter on lift off, nothing over the top!

What I need is some sort of valve that would 'tee' into the vacuum line for the BOV, and be able to switch between 'open' and 'closed' (i.e. vacuum line blocked and unblocked) with varying voltages (5V or 0V)

Does jaycar or similar sell such a thing?

It'd be a pretty simple circuit, just take a voltage source from the battery/alternator (something under the dash) then run a resistor, the switch and the valve in series, grounded by the chassis/similar...

I'm assuming I'd need some sort of resistor to bring the circuit voltage down from 12-14V, to 5V.

I'm pretty comfortable with KVL, KCL and Ohm's Laws, so I'd say I'd need about a 10ohm resistor

in series with the device/switch, so that the device receives 0-5V instead of 0-14 volts. This may change depending on the signal that the valve is rated at (might not need a resistor at all).

Please don't be all hatin', just looking for some way to apply some of the uni stuff I'm studying atm, cos I could use this as a project for this electrical engineering unit im doing.

Any ideas? comments?

Thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318354-idea-for-bov-switch/
Share on other sites

I think I have found a flaw in your idea. Now correct my if I am wrong, but if you installed something that disengaged the vacuum line to the BOV, wouldn't that in essence allow the bov to leak open under boost as there is no pressure on the other side holding it in place?

Edited by PM-R33
I think I have found a flaw in your idea. Now correct my if I am wrong, but if you installed something that disengaged the vacuum line to the BOV, wouldn't that in essence allow the bov to leak open under boost as there is no pressure on the other side holding it in place?

Yeah this may happen, I've noticed atm (with the boost that im running -10psi) that the BOV spring is still tight enough to stay closed under full boost and even under lift off too.

Good call though I might need to check this out more!

you want a detachable wastegate basically

Ohk really? What's the wastegate got to do with the BOV functioning?

Regardless of the switch position (and assuming the BOV stays shut under boost) the car will still make and hold the same amount of boost pressure...

It'll just sound differnt lifting off the throttle.

I think I have found a flaw in your idea. Now correct my if I am wrong, but if you installed something that disengaged the vacuum line to the BOV, wouldn't that in essence allow the bov to leak open under boost as there is no pressure on the other side holding it in place?

exactly right.

you can do what you want but you will need two boost feeds to your BOV

let me explane

the BOV only opens when the the pressure in the piping its connected to is greater then the pressure on the other side of the spring witch is fed by a boost line witch is connected to the opposite side of the throttle body than witch the BOV sits (bov on turbo side and boost line conected to the engine side of throttle body)

hence when you back off the throttle body closers an in-balance in pressure occurs in the BOV causing it to open.

BUT

if you take the boost line from nipple on the same side of the throttle body as the BOV (turbo side) the pressure will remain equal and the BOV will not open. (assuming it has a strong spring STOCK MAY NOT BE STRONG ENOUGH)

so to do what you are wanting you will need a feed from each side of the throttle body and some way of switch between the two.

for this i suggest either an electronic valve that has 2 inputs and one out put that allows you to switch between the two.

OR

2 normal open/close air or liquid valves where you have one on each boost line before they connect into a T piece and connect into the BOV

SO IN SHORT IS IT POSSIBLE YES!

IS IT SIMPLE NO!

Yeah I see where your coming from, but I know for sure my bov stays shut under boost. The spring is strong enough...

you might be ok with the a/m bovs providing the spring is strong enough. the R34 bovs are actually open 4mm at idle and decel to smooth reverb and r33 are similar so dont try it on stockers.

I've been considering something like this for a while now...

Go ghetto :)

Swing past bunnings and grab a 12v electronic irrigation solenoid... put it in the plumb-back line, and you're done. When the valve is shut, you'll get flutter as it's blocked, when open you'll get the sneeze.

Edited by Samon

Yeah they do, but they are $450 bucks lol.

Plus, when adjusted, they don't cause flutter, they only change the sound of the escaping air from the BOV.

Cool, but a different concept to what im trying to achieve...

[edit] wow i just saw that they are $720! lol my bad

Edited by turbo x-trail

We have had a similar issue getting a bov to vent on supercharged x5 BMW with valvetronic as they run virtually no vacuum at low throttle angle/load. We ran a vacuum canister that accumulated vacuum as you drove and then used a 3port mac valve to turn vacuum onto the bov when required.

You could do the same thing but instead of a vacuum canister you would need a boost canister(quite dangerous) anth then use a 3port to swithch between normal manifold vacuum to theboost canister when you want it to flutter.

Thanks for your positive input guys! I think I'm gonna go with sickr33s idea and have a "y" piece in the vacuum line to switch between post throttle vac/boost signal, then pre throttle boost. This way I can be assured that the piston stays shut under boost.

Now I've gotta find such a device. I'll start looking at jaycar and see where that gets me...

again, checkout the solenoid for an EBC, i cant recall the exact logic of the one i have fitted, but it has 3 hoses attatched, so i'm thinking 1 pressure source in, and the ability to electronically switch between one of 2 outs either totally or in varying degrees.

Rig it up backwards and you have 2 pressure sources in, of which you can select one.

btw my ebc is an eboost, not suggesting you go to the lengths of getting a whole kit, but it might give you a guide as to what solenoid it uses.

Ohk sweet, looks like and ebc solenoid is the way to go! I've never used an ebc before, how is the solenoid wired up?does it just have a ground, positive and a signal line?

An ebc flows enough air for a wastegate actuator so in theory it should flow enough air to act as a signal for the BOV. Just need to nut out the wiring, I think I saw the turbosnart website has an installation guide for their range of ebcs. That should help me out!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
    • Welcome Adam. Car looks great!
    • "With a 1.5-WAY, the LSD is effective only during acceleration."
    • Well it wasn't as easy as I thought.... and it also wasn't in my original manual which I did end up finding. They discuss the process in the Nismo catalogue though and it requires slight machining. Page 145.  NISMO PARTS CATALOGUE 2020
    • I'm an idiot, my intercooler is rated for 1000hp. I had clicked on the wrong product. Knowing the delta P would be nice, but I'm doubtful I'll do it. Now as for an EMAP, that would be great and I'll get around to it eventually but from my findings in my last post, I'm considering a turbo swap now. 
×
×
  • Create New...