Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys. what power have you done on standanrd bottomend rb30s and on what boost and what turbo? il have mine going soon and wanna know what power you guys have done.

mines a rb30 bored 1mm oversize with new mahle pistons and rings and king bearings. standard rods and bolts. has rb25det oil pump on crank collar. what power do you rekn itd do on 18psi with a t04z with split pulse 0.84 rear? hopefully not too much for standard motor. hopefully want it to cop 450rwhp for a while on pump fuel. i dont really thrash my cars everywhere but that might change when i get one with a bitta power.

does the ones ripsnz have on youtube saying standard internals have anything done to them special? ones running 25psi plus 100hp shot of nos. its 650whp it says i think. and few other ones with heaps of power and he says there all good for that power. just been wondering if he does any tricks on them to make them last.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/329976-standard-bottomend-rb30dets/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If you have aftermarket pistsons and stuff... Why are you asking about standard bottom ends?

Either way if you only want 450rwhp, the T04Z is a very bad choice, a GT3076 in a 1.06 would be the pick for 320-330rwkw.

A T04Z is 600rwhp territory. A signifigant difference.

If you have aftermarket pistsons and stuff... Why are you asking about standard bottom ends?

Either way if you only want 450rwhp, the T04Z is a very bad choice, a GT3076 in a 1.06 would be the pick for 320-330rwkw.

A T04Z is 600rwhp territory. A signifigant difference.

there only cast pistons so id assume theyre about the same strength as the factory nissan ones. and the bearings wont help it take any extra power would it? the rest is standard nissan stuff.

will get more power out of it later. only wanna buy the turbo once but.

If you're buying aftermarket pistons then why go cast? save a bit more and get some forgies.

But really, how long is a piece of string?

Good balancing, good balancer and a good tune should see it live a longer life than if you did none of those things.

i have done the same and just used some aftemarket cast pistons as they were needed due to worn block and only cost 300 bucks with rings. If you do forgies then its the rods as the weak link and then oil pump and on and on it goes. I decided to save the $1750 and just limit the setup to under 500rwhp. I have one engine running a 3076r and its currently not running the correct cam timing so power is down but its running 22psi and 330rwhp. This shall be retuned very soon to around 400hp or so when i get some spare time to do it. Another engine the same exact setup will be using a hks t04z and we shall see how it lasts with 500rwhp or so. Just finishing off the final touches to the donar car at this stage so wont be running for a while yet.

I'll let you know as well. By accident rather than design I will have all the good gear in my sig on an RB30/25 stock except for new rings bearings and rod bolts. [Would have preferred to have it rebored forged pistons and balanced] With the stuff I have it should make the 500hp ok but for how long is the question. I will be relying on a good tune and 6,800 rev limit to make it last so if it doesn't quite hit the 500hp so be it. Anything over 300awkw will be a bonus

r33 N1 turbos are supposed to be good to 550 hp at the engine.

Im shooting for 400 atw or 18 psi what ever comes first, But the small N1 should give great throttle response

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/tbroom/Turbos.htm

I thought N1s didnt have great response for their size, so you could go a larger newer turbo that would have the same response but better top end.

Yeah but I have the turbos and will go with them until I feel like i need more.

if I can crack 400 at the treads it will be enough

Pits will be tuning it and the brief will be 18psi or 400 when you get to one of those stop

Slappers on big turbos do NOT last long...

I've broken 2 now... With a max of 1000KM on them... Pushing 1Bar (14PSi) through TD07S housings, t66 front and a t04r rear wheel.

Nothing below 4000/4500RPM, then everything ramps in over 200/300RPM...

Rev limited at 6600RPM.

On the dyno it made "250RWKW" wheel spinning like a spastic... Using fuel consumption and AFR it would be making around 360RWKW... (69% inj duty on 880cc injectors)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...