Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

it'll bolt up to the engine fine, but i cant remember if the length is the same. if not then the driveshaft would need to be chopped up. i have seen it in a number of r32s as a cheap fix though so i would assume its the same. measure the length of the old box and compare that to the prospective rb30 box

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/331821-rb30-gearbox/#findComment-5384377
Share on other sites

rb30 gearbox is the same as a rb20 gearbox just different casings. everything will bolt up. starter, slave, tailshaft, mounts.

it is the tinest bit longer but nothing that the slip joint in the tailshaft wont take up

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/331821-rb30-gearbox/#findComment-5391824
Share on other sites

There are 2 different RB30 Manual Gearboxes (in the VL's anyway, not sure about R31's)

"__7" and "MX5" I forget what the second one is but it ends in a 5.

The "__7" is the RB30ET box and the MX5 is the non turbo one. Basically from what I remember the MX5 is similar to the RB20 box BUT has different 1st and 2nd Gears. Im not sure about the Turbo box. I think the turbo has a slightly bigger flywheel then the non turbo

Search on Calais turbo would be the go... Or if you want an R31 box then someone on here will be able to help you surely

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/331821-rb30-gearbox/#findComment-5391857
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Dont mean to bring up an old thread but figure its better then making a new one ...

I have a N/a auto r32 sedan .... looking at doing a manual conversion and was thinking of going a rb30 box as there a hell of a lot cheaper and easier to find then the rb20 box.

Also i figure beingg a non turbo i wont too much have to worry about the strength differences between the rb30 and rb20 as i dont see the sluggish rb20de being too powerful for the box haha

Anyway, my question is, can i use the rb30 stuff, clutch, slave, master cyl ?? or does it have to be rb20 stuff ??

Could be a stupid question but thought better be safe then sorry!

Also, will the N/a sedan auto tailshaft fit ?? or will i need a manual tailshaft ??

Thanks in advanced

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/331821-rb30-gearbox/#findComment-6332817
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
    • Return flow cooler will be killing you I reckon. You can certainly push more through a low mount setup but they're good numbers for a stock looking engine bay.  Mine made 345rwkw (hub) at 22psi on 98 with a "highflow" on a stock manifold but it's a long way from a normal high flow or standard engine. I used one of those Turbosmart IWG-75's and it was great with the Motec running closed loop boost with pressure being applied to both sides of the diaphragm. 
    • Hey man do you have pic of adaptor plate by any chance I need to match up the bolt holes as my gearbox adaptor plate ones are way off the only bolts of starter motor are matching thanks 
×
×
  • Create New...