Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just wondering what you guys think is a safe rev limit for my motor, the tuner set it at 7500rpm but I want to make sure it is likely to last hitting these revs.

it has been build with acl race bearings, stock rods, arp rod bolts, arias forged pistons and everything else has just been freshened up and is standard. Running 18psi which drops down to 15 at the top end on a gcg highflowed rb20 turbo making 236kw and dropping off after about 7300rpm

Would you guys set it lower at say 7-7.3k? or you think with decent bearings and better rod bolts it should be fine hitting 7500?

It is a street car and only occasionally tracked, if I do I will aim to keep revs below 6500-7000 just to be kind to the motor.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/337139-safe-rev-limit-for-built-rb25/
Share on other sites

Just wondering what you guys think is a safe rev limit for my motor, the tuner set it at 7500rpm but I want to make sure it is likely to last hitting these revs.

it has been build with acl race bearings, stock rods, arp rod bolts, arias forged pistons and everything else has just been freshened up and is standard. Running 18psi which drops down to 15 at the top end on a gcg highflowed rb20 turbo making 236kw and dropping off after about 7300rpm

Would you guys set it lower at say 7-7.3k? or you think with decent bearings and better rod bolts it should be fine hitting 7500?

It is a street car and only occasionally tracked, if I do I will aim to keep revs below 6500-7000 just to be kind to the motor.

The factory redline is 7500 isn't it?

Plus the turbo wouldn't make more power past 7000rpm I would imagine so there is really no sense shifting after that point

Doesn't sound like there is much point revving it past 7000rpm anyway.... crank collar and oil mods been done to it?

Not that I know of, would have to speak to the builder. I try and shift around 7000rpm but with the crap tyres I have it hits the limiter half the time as it doesn't get traction.

Makes peak power from 6300 - 7200rpm basically flat there at 236kw

Edited by Rolls
Stock will run all day at 7000. Is it fully balanced? If you want to change at 7K then 7200 sounds like it would do.

Yep that was part of the assembly everything was properly balanced and all tolerances double checked.

Whilst I don't have any need to rev it over 7000 I guess I am more curious about the mechanical strength. I'm sure someone has done the calcs of where bits tend to let go and which parts need to be strengthened to overcome this.

Yep that was part of the assembly everything was properly balanced and all tolerances double checked.

Whilst I don't have any need to rev it over 7000 I guess I am more curious about the mechanical strength. I'm sure someone has done the calcs of where bits tend to let go and which parts need to be strengthened to overcome this.

We rev our race cars to 8500 and 8800rpm. I have friends who rev their RB26's to 10k and the Nitto R34 would have to rev somewhere close to 11 or 12.

Forged crank if you wanna go over 9000. Harmonic balancer upgrade, oil pump upgrade...etc....etc...where do you want to stop?

You should just tell us how far you want to rev your engine and we can tell you what you need to upgrade to safely do it

^^^^ What Dan said.

I really really miss the sound of my 25 at 8000rpm :)

I miss the sound of your engine too mate, what a cracker it was!

I have a fully rebuilt RB25, my tuner set the rev limit to 7200, only ever hit it at Texi days when its wheel spinning and boosting and then WHACK, limiter. Does not make any more power from roughly 6800 onwards, but it does sound hot :)

Forged crank if you wanna go over 9000. Harmonic balancer upgrade, oil pump upgrade...etc....etc...where do you want to stop?

You should just tell us how far you want to rev your engine and we can tell you what you need to upgrade to safely do it

I don't really need to or want to rev it any higher due to the turbo setup, just trying to get an understanding of where it would fail and why with the current parts. A lot of anecdotal evidence with peoples personal rev limits but I haven't read much about where they will actually fail and what parts will go.

Also providing a perfect tune what actually does kill them, limiter bashing, outright power, or just spinning the rpm too high no matter what the load is?

Edited by Rolls
I don't really need to or want to rev it any higher due to the turbo setup, just trying to get an understanding of where it would fail and why with the current parts. A lot of anecdotal evidence with peoples personal rev limits but I haven't read much about where they will actually fail and what parts will go.

Also providing a perfect tune what actually does kill them, limiter bashing, outright power, or just spinning the rpm too high no matter what the load is?

Revs is the biggest killer. As you increase revs the bearing load increases exponentially. I did see some figures somewhere but it escapes me atm, what they were claiming was that to go from 7500 to 8500 rpm actually doubles the load or something along those lines.

I think it was 500rpm wasnt it? Either was it's massive :P

And what actually lets go can vary as it depends on what parts are inside.

poor rod bolts would mean a rod lets go. if not it could be bearings. Its all subjective in many cases as to what the 'specific' weak point is.

Even if you address a specific weak point, nothing to say it wont fail from just simple bad luck - nothing is perfect.

I reckon it will be fine, not like your running heaps of power, So all though its revving hard theres not the strain that say 300kw would put on the enigne..

I wouldn't worry too much, just drive it and remember to shift before 7500 and it'll be fine.

Id say your tuner knew there was more power up top so gave you the ability to use it..

Sounds like you've built a nice revvy motor that will have very snappy acceleration, be great out of corners...

i think you are best keeping it low as possible where it still makes good power and doesnt drop off

if the boost is already dropping off, thats a sign its becoming in-efficient already

ive had my 33 for about 7 years now on std turbo and engine still with 230k on the clock (got it at 53k)

and i never see the limiter and usually short change the gear around 6500rpm as you can feel the power trail off

so i think this is a good insurance policy as a general practice, it may even make the car overall quicker vs letting it rev out to 7500rpm

Not that I know of, would have to speak to the builder. I try and shift around 7000rpm but with the crap tyres I have it hits the limiter half the time as it doesn't get traction.

Makes peak power from 6300 - 7200rpm basically flat there at 236kw

Sounds like the perfect limit it, holds 236kw at 7200+ so if you want to hold it in gear for a long corner for any reason you can without hitting the limiter...

hitting the limiter is nasty but holding it right near it is great and thats where all the power is..

If a 300kw car can hold 7000 no worries i reckon a 236kw one, handbuilt with good bearings will have no problems at all at 7500 as long as it was built properly..oil cooler would be advisable if your up there all the time though..

Edited by Arthur T3

i could be wrong but i remember reading in one of the magazine that that if you double the rpms you increase the load by 10 fold..

off the top of my head if you were spinning twice as quick, your pistons would be moving twice as fast, 4 times the energy with half as long to slow down, so thats probably 8 fold right there.. so from 7-8, thats roughly 50% increased load on the pistons n bearings.. but at 7300 thats only roughly 15% more.. if you take into consideration your forged pistons are probably slightly lighter than stock pistons, along with stronger bearings.. its probably a good compromise

Jarrod

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...