Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt-r 40km/h Over. Need Your Help!


Recommended Posts

hehe this last page has made me giggle.

Interesting end to all of it.

I've lost my license before & by the same token beaten many many fanciful charges as well. If you've got the way/will to beat it, or use the law to your advantage. Power be to you for doing it. Sometimes the cost is not the issue, it's the principle of the situation.

If more people stood up to the absurd laws, contested their fines then the court system would become clogged and something would be done about the ridiculous revenue raising which is the driving force behind all camera operations. It's got nothing to do with safety at all.

That's when you say that you were under instruction of a police officer and therefore he can't do anything about it.

Yea I was going to fight, but lawyer f**ked up and it'd be another 3 months, so just decided to bite the bullet. We *might* have won, especially because it was only a small distance and low speed. *But* if the judge was in a bad mood he would rule against me.

Just so everyone knows, even given police instructions you *CANNOT* break the law.

I think some people really have no idea how scarily EASY it is to hit 40k over speed limit in *any* skyline.

Fixed. :P

hehe this last page has made me giggle.

Interesting end to all of it.

I've lost my license before & by the same token beaten many many fanciful charges as well. If you've got the way/will to beat it, or use the law to your advantage. Power be to you for doing it. Sometimes the cost is not the issue, it's the principle of the situation.

If more people stood up to the absurd laws, contested their fines then the court system would become clogged and something would be done about the ridiculous revenue raising which is the driving force behind all camera operations. It's got nothing to do with safety at all.

Exactly.

Just because the government says it's right, doesn't make it so.

It's our duty, as an engaged memebr of society, to question and challenge our government at every turn.

Become complacent and before you know it you'll be working for your government, rather than your government working for you (as has already happened).

lol one court case @ a time.

I'm off to court soon over a parking fine. Dirty parking inspectors - I even got picture evidence of them giving out the false ticket.

Fkbags just assume most people roll over and pay - FK THAT!

lol one court case @ a time.

I'm off to court soon over a parking fine. Dirty parking inspectors - I even got picture evidence of them giving out the false ticket.

Fkbags just assume most people roll over and pay - FK THAT!

details?

Said i was parked in non-standing zone, I wasn't. It'll be open/shut as i took pics of the car, the sign - where it was parked.

The works.

I could have sent a letter initially but fk it, clog the court system is my belief. Wont cost me money as ill move my shift so i can attend.

I used to park in one carpark spot all the time at Penrith - a parking bay on a curved laneway.

It was because the parking sign could not be placed on the apex to include that bay as "ONE HOUR PARKING". And the arrow could only start from the bay next to mine.

One day I caught a Ranger who was going to book me. I pointed out to him that the arrow and the sign could only refer to the bay next to mine and hence further down the line.

He walked away.

Two days later, I looked up at the sign, and a touch up job in similar green paint had been used to make the arrow point both ways.

Revenge is alive and well.

I swear: one day, I'll take a step ladder up to that sign and repaint ie. WHITE-OUT that section of arrow

He walked away.

Two days later, I looked up at the sign, and a touch up job in similar green paint had been used to make the arrow point both ways.

Revenge is alive and well.

I swear: one day, I'll take a step ladder up to that sign and repaint ie. WHITE-OUT that section of arrow

I'd park there, and when I got a fine; take photo's of the clearly vandalised sign, and present that as evidence.

Rude B'stards!

If you have never done 40k over the limit then feel free to have a go at the op

other wise stfu

Its easy to get 20 k over in my wifes 1.6 auto laser let alone a Japanese super car

Man there are some righteous wankers in here, holier than thou much guys?

+ 1

he could have easily just done a stat dec but manned up and took it to court.

bigger balls than most.

Edited by hamiltonau

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...