Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If only I could get in contact with UniGroup when need be they'd have some business from me too. Are their any days/hours where UniGroup are definitetly open or definitely by the phone?

Of the 5 different dyno's (days) i've been too they have by far the best service/knowledge.

  • 1 year later...
When I'm not doing it, my car is tuned exclusively by Unigroup Engineering.

www.unigroup.com.au

Yavuz and Valent are very communicative guys and have tuned some very very fast and big dollar cars that are still running hard.

I cannot speak highly enough of their efforts in correcting my tune on the pfc.  Less ignition advance, more fuel, same power.  They are also happy to tell you exactly what they're doing as they do it which helps you stay in the loop.

I must have picked their brains 20 times since first going there, (phone, email etc) and have found them more than happy to chat.

Yavuz also operates one of the dynos for Dyno Dynamics at Summernats.  Expert with the Power FC and how it should be tuned for our cars and your application.

Adrian

agreed

getting my pfc tuned next week there

sounds like Ben is a good name for a tuner lol...

drop Ben from BEL Garage a message, www.belgarage.com.au

road tune for part throttle mapping + response, dyno to clean up top end, won't let anyone else tune my car :P

ive been there once to buy an air filter off them. they seem like nice guys.

also, Haak are good too. they're on the horsley drive right near eastern creek. Dave there is really good...

Spoken to alot of the customers that were waiting at CRD whilst waiting for my tune to finish and many of them were ex-customers of the above mentioned tuners....Ummm I wonder why that is?? AnywayI ask them why they didn't come to CRD and see Jim in the first place and the standard response is:

"Yeah I should've, but the other guys were cheaper.."

Very wise aren't you?? Now you guys have to pay again...

A small tip: Do it the right the first time...You get what you pay for.

Edited by Demon

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...