Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah at street power levels the extra valve train weight is more than made up for by extra valve area and the fact you have dual cams meaning less compromise with valve timing, however is it possible that at extreme rpm of 10-11k which some of these motors see that the extra valve train loss could become an issue, does anyone know if more or less lift can be achieved with single vs twin cam rbs?

Plenty of twincam RB's at 12000RPM+++

Not sure on the lift though although I woulnd't assume so.

Think about it, at higher flow levels the increased area and variability between INLET and EXHAUST with added tuneability becomes an even greater benefit.

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Think about it, at higher flow levels the increased area and variability between INLET and EXHAUST with added tuneability becomes an even greater benefit.

This is what I would have assumed as well, just trying to get an idea about why the records aren't basically the asme, probably has nothing to do with actual power and more to do with the cars.

This is what I would have assumed as well, just trying to get an idea about why the records aren't basically the asme, probably has nothing to do with actual power and more to do with the cars.

Yeah mate, that's pretty much what I've assumed as well.

I'll throw in my 2 cents here.

I own a high comp Tomei 2.8 with a set of decent cams with a pair of GT RS's hanging off the side of it. After driving a 3 litre with -10s (MarkoR1's) and being in N1GTR's car with a very similar setup I would not even look at the 2.6, 2.7 or 2.8 engines. It almost wants me to throw mine in the bin and build a 3 litre + engine. All that rubbish you hear about "30's dont rev" is exactly that.... a load of crap.

I'll throw in my 2 cents here.

I own a high comp Tomei 2.8 with a set of decent cams with a pair of GT RS's hanging off the side of it. After driving a 3 litre with -10s (MarkoR1's) and being in N1GTR's car with a very similar setup I would not even look at the 2.6, 2.7 or 2.8 engines. It almost wants me to throw mine in the bin and build a 3 litre + engine. All that rubbish you hear about "30's dont rev" is exactly that.... a load of crap.

Don't throw it away Paul; just leave it out the front and I will come get it :P

a block in crappy condition in the us goes for a minimum of 1k in the usa, they average around 2k not including machine work, belt, headgaskt, gaskets, and yadda, bare minumum is 5k for a 3 liter block to be operational in the us, i would just do a 2jz...

shipping a whole engine block would cost at least $500 if not more, $1k is probably a pretty accurate outcome for buying a $100 block shipping it there and some markup to make it actually worth while.

Edited by Rolls
I'll throw in my 2 cents here.

I own a high comp Tomei 2.8 with a set of decent cams with a pair of GT RS's hanging off the side of it. After driving a 3 litre with -10s (MarkoR1's) and being in N1GTR's car with a very similar setup I would not even look at the 2.6, 2.7 or 2.8 engines. It almost wants me to throw mine in the bin and build a 3 litre + engine. All that rubbish you hear about "30's dont rev" is exactly that.... a load of crap.

Agreed. A well built/balanced RB30 can rev to 8 and beyond without rattling itself to pieces.

The head and turbo combo is the key for sustaining power all the way up there though.

Mine is going to 8000rpm maybe more if the head allows :whistling:

sadly i think i will never achieve the 3 liter status, if my stroker 2.7 dies, i am going neo and calling it a day lol, i would love to get a rb30 though the two i have seen were ridiclous.

current mods:

t517z turbos

264 greddy cams

trust front/dump pipes

trust PEII cat back exhaust

trust 720cc injectors

power fc d-jetro

os giken twin plate

basically i wana build the ultimate stagea in all aspects power, looks, interior the complete package and wana make 600 hp+ at least to make the wagon really quick due to its weight, it will be a show then street car. the budget i have is approx. 40k for engine.

If you want to build the ultimate Stagea you will have to go north of 600awkw (not 600hp) to beat Psymin's ultimate Stagea. He used a 2.8 stroker kit but bang for buck Rb30 will get youi there cheaper - see Spool or Proengines or RIPs: http://www.ripsltd.com/
If you want to build the ultimate Stagea you will have to go north of 600awkw (not 600hp) to beat Psymin's ultimate Stagea. He used a 2.8 stroker kit but bang for buck Rb30 will get youi there cheaper - see Spool or Proengines or RIPs: http://www.ripsltd.com/

nissanstageapc151fq690x.jpg

"Click."

Edited by dirtyRS4

thanks for all the ideas and advice i will let you know what happens and i know about PSYMIN's stagea and if i wanted to build the ultimate power stagea i would have to go north of 757kw but thats not what i'm after. I'm after a show quality stagea big custom stereo, custom paint and engine with power to back it up so it isnt all show (which i have yet to see anyone do to a stag PSYMIN being the closest). Thanks again for all the help will keep you posted.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My apologies. I forgot we were talking about weird beard M series stuff. Had been talking elsewhere with someone about an R33 with similar subject and got confused.
    • Nope, I don't like the look of ND RF, or any ND really, I don't like their faces or arses, why, because of their "modern" lines, the NC, whilst "modernish" has a more rounded shape that I like Well, that's how my overly judgemental eyes see it anyway  
    • Should be more than fine, especially the overall fuel pressure would never exceed 3.5bar (assuming that thing never gets more than 0.5bar of boost in stock form). According to the chart, it's 11amps.
    • I definitely know the first rule here, look first, ask second. I've seen many people get roasted 😂 I found a few diagrams for the RB, but I'm yet to come across one for the VQ. From what I have read, the pump gets the +12v along with the FPCM, and it's the negative wire that gets passed through the resistor to regulate the voltage. So I assume I can just ground the negative wire at the pump to eliminate the FPCM control. But I really wanted to see the VQ circuit diagram first to make sure I understood it correctly. Once the new pump is in I'll do some testing to see how it behaves, and in the meantime, I'll keep looking for a wiring diagram. Thanks for your help mate, your time is greatly appreciated.    
    • Maybe? I have the Supercheap ToolPro low thingo. It has a somewhat smaller diameter lifting "bowl" than you would expect on a workshop grade trolley jack, and a split rubber pad to suit that diameter. It clears the "N1" style skirts I have. Probably wouldn't if the jack's bowl and a suitably larger rubber block were in use. Having said that though.....you only need the rubber block to exist on the inner side of the pinchweld, so could carve away any rubber that fouled the skirt, leaving some there for "insurance" </simples>
×
×
  • Create New...