Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Has anyone used a Turbo Bag for a dedicated circuit racer ? I want to reduce the engine bay temps, so that between races I can more easily work on the car if I need to, as touching a hot turbo housing isn't much fun. Just want to know whether the standard turbo bag offerings would cope with the heap generated from a real hard track workout ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/343590-turbo-bag-on-a-race-car/
Share on other sites

I don't see why the better quality ones wouldn't cope?

We use them on "non water jacket housing" turbo diesel marine turbos often, and they spend hours at a time under high load with the turbos glowing.

Edited by Marlin
I don't see why the better quality ones wouldn't cope?

We use them on "non water jacket housing" turbo diesel marine turbos often, and they spend hours at a time under high load with the turbos glowing.

I was just going to grab one from HorsePower-in-a-box, for $200 I guess no harm in giving it a go.

I was just going to grab one from HorsePower-in-a-box, for $200 I guess no harm in giving it a go.

I'd be very interested in how it goes mate,,,. It would ruin my party trick though,,,lighting my cig off the turbo.

Cheers

Neil.

Considered ceramic coating?

Although it's not a circuit racing application, my turbo bag works pretty well, but the heat still radiates out from the dump and CHRA.

What other heat management do you have? i.e. heat wrap on the dump etc?

Also define "work on the car"? Cos I doubt you'd be able to do anything on the exhaust side for a good 30 mins after, or do you mean the entire engine bay is too hot?

I run one of those Turbo by Garrett turbo beanies. They tend to deteriorate a bit over time.. I've had my current one in there for 9 months and its still in pretty good nick, but the one before it was well and truly shagged after ~2.5 years of use. Maybe this one is slightly better quality. Definitely helps keeping the heat in the exhaust housing and away from the engine.

^ They do seem to be a perish/serviceable type of thing don't they.

Kinda like plugs and so on. I know a couple people who's beanies didnt last all that long (couple years tops)

But then they are cheap for their benefit.

Do you have a heat shield Paul? I could tell a massive difference when I had my lowmount/RB25 setup with or without the shield on.

Take it off and everything was virtually untouchable on the turbo side, heat shield back on and while the shield was hot, it served its purpose and cam covers etc were fine to touch :)

There are better solutions...lol you just need to be willing to spend a few hours and a shit load of cuts on your hands :)

gallery_462_50_21038.jpg

gallery_462_50_47384.jpg

HPC Coating (the brand) is far more durable then anything I have seen from Competition Coatings. I have not treid Jet Hot, but HPC are worth the extra money. Though I still think its more an anti-corrosion thing and durability thing then out right thermal control.

On the new setup I am going to do a wany McLaren trick and throw some gold thernal film in the engine bay, along with more of the ACL heat guards. I am going to replace the Greddy turbo shield with one made from the ACL stuff. Who knows how it will work out, but air is a pretty good insulator so

^ They do seem to be a perish/serviceable type of thing don't they.

Kinda like plugs and so on. I know a couple people who's beanies didnt last all that long (couple years tops)

But then they are cheap for their benefit.

Do you have a heat shield Paul? I could tell a massive difference when I had my lowmount/RB25 setup with or without the shield on.

Take it off and everything was virtually untouchable on the turbo side, heat shield back on and while the shield was hot, it served its purpose and cam covers etc were fine to touch :unsure:

I had a heat shield on my previous T04Z, but not on this turbo, hence the thought to go to the beanie instead. If it only last one season I'm not too fussed, as it will be the least of my racing expenses.

unless you have a hole in your turbine housing and are effectivly blowtorching the turbo beanie, there is no way you should kill it with 1 track day. I find that the seems/corners of the exterior fabirc tend to crack/split. but even as they get a bit ratty, they still perform their function well.

Just to throw this into the mix.

Though I don't know this first hand, I've heard plenty of mention about warping housings when using a bag. This would be something to consider on a race car that sustains high temps.

Or is this just an old wives tale?

unless you have a hole in your turbine housing and are effectivly blowtorching the turbo beanie, there is no way you should kill it with 1 track day. I find that the seems/corners of the exterior fabirc tend to crack/split. but even as they get a bit ratty, they still perform their function well.

Yeah, I'd have thought it would last at least a season before need to be replaced too.

My theory is it 'disintegrates' due to thermal expansion, in particular differential expansion. When one surface has 800deg C air blowing through it and the other is subjest to air blowing past it at 60deg C you can understand the thermal stresses in the metal. If you coat it and wrap it you have more uniform temperature in the material, and more controlled cooling when the thing is turned off...rather then effectively being air quenched every time the thing cools down from being red hot.

It does mean your ultimate operational temperature is higher...but I think the rate at which you heat everything up also matters a lot. I usually have a warm up lap or two not just for oil and coolant and brake temps etc, but to let the manifold, dump etc all come up to a nice hot operating temp....i suppose that only matters if you are running aftermarket crap on your car like me .... ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
×
×
  • Create New...