Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Noticed this in the turbo upgrade thread... Unfortunately it doesn't seem to help in any way in telling what the turbo is like because the curve is a dog of a thing (I'm guessing boost control is all over the shop), no boost level was noted and also inlet temps would allow for a fair bit of correction power wise!

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/index.php?app=core&module=attach&section=attach&attach_rel_module=post&attach_id=340033

Edited by SimonR32

Did any one see this result from GTX3071 in .82 rear housing? It appears to be pretty laggy thou. even compare to a normal 3076

link here

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/55845-rb25-turbo-upgrade-all-dyno-results/page__view__findpost__p__5815898

Agreed, it shouldn't be dropping up high either with the .82 rear. Perhaps the 1.06 was a good idea after all. :whistling: I wonder what boost?

I should have mine in soon, just completed the fuel system.

Twin Walbro 342's, separate 6an lines to each rail.

post-63525-0-19919400-1305553786_thumb.jpg

post-63525-0-39903100-1305553805_thumb.jpg

post-63525-0-67688800-1305553820_thumb.jpg

Agreed, it shouldn't be dropping up high either with the .82 rear. Perhaps the 1.06 was a good idea after all. :whistling: I wonder what boost?

I should have mine in soon, just completed the fuel system.

Twin Walbro 342's, separate 6an lines to each rail.

Did you use proper fuel rated power supply cable to the fuel pumps?

I'd take that one with a grain of salt, something in that setup is potentially a bit dicky I suspect. Looks too laggy, even though GTX turbos seem to be laggier than the GT counterparts. Hope the owner joins the convo and gives more info.

The question is: how much better can the GTX be? Its a new compressor wheel stuck onto the same old exhaust wheel.

I am least surprised with the results, factors I believe contribute to their lack of excellence must be related to the step away from high and low blades along with larger trim sizes in general. I note that the EFR still use the high and low blades.

I think it would be a nighmare to develope such a product in a lab, you have to have the backing of a real world performance application to be successful with this sort of product. If successful surely Garrett would have plastered it all over the web to show everyone their marvel, however there was no such talk. I suspect these were purely lab bred items with limited environment testing.

Scotty, not to discredit your setup, I hope it works out really well and I also have faith in the bigger housing. Your workmanship thus far is also VERY impressive, GL.

I'd take that one with a grain of salt, something in that setup is potentially a bit dicky I suspect. Looks too laggy, even though GTX turbos seem to be laggier than the GT counterparts. Hope the owner joins the convo and gives more info.

Don't forget that's the shonkiest power curve I've seen yet on a tuned car with supporting turbo....unless it's wheelspin

Perhaps, but the exducer tips are on a nice 40 degree angle which I haven't seen before, and the front housing has huge flow. I was very interested to see the potential of the compressor and running the tial 1.06 rear shouldn't choke it at all. Im not sure I can reach the the full output potential with my gearbox anyway but im guessing an easy 350 on e85, perhaps close to 400 at stupid boost.

Don't forget that's the shonkiest power curve I've seen yet on a tuned car with supporting turbo....unless it's wheelspin

Didnt forget it at all, I basically said something was clearly up and figured that people reading the post would know exactly what I was referring to by looking at the plot. Don't know if its a dodgy tune, or something is up with the motor or what - there are various possibilities... hence not being specific :)

I am sure it could do better than that, though I had hoped the GTX3071R was going to be the most likely unit to prove its worth from the get go however remain unsold on the GTX turbos.

biggest problem with that is the .82 IW housing will become a big restriction before the compressor reaches it limits. apart from that though it should be a good comparison, especially for spool

The 1.06 will be a waste of time though imho, if you are going that big you may as well go up to a GT35 based howside with a smaller a/r turbine housing... they seem to drive nicer imho.

So you have you driven a car with a GTX3071 and Tial 1.06? :)

I didn't have a choice as Tial are out of stock of the .82 and .63 worldwide and the other flange types just wont fit where I have mounted it. Like I have said, this housing will be perfect for the 3.5L I am building. I am hoping it frees up the top end and gives me a more gradual boost curve, I didn't like the way my highflow snapped on at 3k anyway.

GT35's aren't my favourite turbo, I have heard of too many failing, even at low (less than 20psi) boost, perhaps because they are so common?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
    • For race cars, this is one part where I find having the roll cage bar having gone through a hole in the floor better than the build it up on a ledge inside... The Merc I help on, the main hoop ends are marked on the car, and the jack is marked... Jack goes under a few inches and lifts one whole side of the car up... Removes that fight for long slim jacks for race car duties!   My biggest issue for the daily drivers I work on, is my jacks don't go high enough. The jacks start out on a few blocks, jack it up, then start a second jack under it on more blocks, and then I can get an axle stand under it. My axle stands are presently in use, and are nearly fully extended. The car is sitting with barely more than a cm of clearance to get the wheel off the studs! Sarah's Kluger is the same, as it has an ungodly amount of droop available in the suspension and a distinct lack of good jacking points!
    • Happy? Yep, my to do list is getting shorter and shorter. Either this light approaching is the end of the tunnel, or I'm about to be hit by a train... Ha ha ha   Also, Duncan isn't that far out of town that you need to make a multi day drive out of it. 😛
    • Sorry I meant that we are building the EH for a client.
    • LOL, when one "money pit" is never enough Noice, and excellent work mate
×
×
  • Create New...