Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://twentysports.blogspot.com/p/channel-6.html

Bout the best one i have found after a bit of channel hopping..

best place to go is justintv and then watch the chats on some of them and often someone whinges bout no english channels then someone posts some up..

loved this bit conjecture about RBR KERS by Jonathon Neale this week on F1.com

Q: Button said after Australia that he felt your KERS system was more effective than Red Bull’s. Do you agree and what will it be worth to you, per lap, in Malaysia?

JN: I wouldn’t have thought he’d know about Red Bull’s KERS system, certainly I don’t know about their KERS. I think on the basis that as Mercedes have an extra 12 months experience than the others then there should be advantages with integration and packaging. But it’s a difficult thing to quantify as we don’t have any comparative information. One thing we are all looking for at this stage is to make sure our cars are as reliable as possible.

Does he know that RBR didn't run KERS during the race....??? Like wtf. Surely Button would have said that tongue in cheek.

webber killing it

love to know whos running KERS at the front this weekend

so happy its back

Mark Webber sent shivers down the spines of rivals here in Sepang this morning as he lapped his Red Bull RB7 1.665s faster than anyone else. Lewis Hamilton got closest in his McLaren, but his 1m 39.316s best was light years behind Webber’s 1m 37.651s.

From formula1.com. 1.6 sec is HUGE - yes it's only FP1, but I doubt hamilton was just cruising around, and RBR aren't the sort of team to fake a "Hollywood number".

Live stream for fp1?

looks like one hd wont be putting it on live.. but we knew that right..

also i heard one hd is closing down and changing to a channel like 7 Mate...

rubbish!!

yerp heard that as well how gay, guess mr Murdoch is getting his way since joining the channel 10 board....Be interesting to see what they're going to do with it now, probably back to the 10.30 time frame...

Hey did you make this post from your iphone? and if yes what app do you use?

1. Take screenshot

2. Load photobucket app

3. Select from camera roll through app

4. Review uploaded pic and click on info

5. Copy IMG code

6. Paste code here

7. BOOM!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...