Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

Looking at upgrading the diff in my R32 GTST. Has an RB25DET fitted & has seen better days... Viscous LSD is still working fine (for now) but diff is very noisy (suspect c/w & pinion or carriers) so figure while I'm there I may as well upgrade LSD. Daily-driver but may end up doing track-work soon.

Basically tossing up between a full GTR rear-end & an aftermarket LSD centre. Roughly same sort of price...

I am a mechanic by trade & specialise in auto-transmissions & diffs, etc so could easily enough fit the Nismo clutch-pack upgrade to the GTR diff.

I realise the GTR shafts are stronger but car is & will be only making around 300rwkw so probably overkill.

Has anyone even had problems with GTST shafts before at any power level?

The thing is GTR shafts are also heavier & for the sake of performance, etc I am trying to keep everything as light as possible.

I know the GTR runs alloy hubs so would this counter-act the extra weight of the shafts?

Any opinions on the best overall compromise would be great.

Cheers

  • Nope 3
  • 1 month later...

The driveshaft in GTS-Ts have been known to wear over time, especially with highly modified gts-ts

The most common problem is tailshaft backlash which can come in the form of noise/vibration from the rear in a different degrees.

When I had my recent service, my mechanic said that I have a bit of tailshaft backlash present - still can't pick it myself but its there none the less.

With this wear starting to happen with mine, and me only only making 235rwkw, I'd say it would be a good idea to upgrade the diff if your making 300rwkw +

GTR diff will be bullet proof. Get a recon'd second hand one and you'll be laughing.

James

I snapped a rear axle with 195rwkw. But I think that was no real indication of the strength of the axle. Know plenty of other GTST's with more power or harsher drivetrains that have been fine I think I was just unlucky.

have you considered a 1.5 way? A friend went from a locked diff to a 1.5 way in a 32 and was very happy with it. seemed very predictible and locked hard (Nismo 1.5 way I think it was)

There not terribly cheap to buy outright but he got his second hand at a decent price so if your lucky something like that could show up, or you might find something on import monster or a japanese spares site. I dont know much about the GTR Diff's but I can tell you for sure that the axles are thicker and stronger. But I didnt really think at 300rwkw you would be snapping axles (despite me snapping one with 100kw less)

I have a Nismo 2-way in my 32gtst and I love it, was a daily driver like that for over a year. It's not for everybody though and requires a slightly different driving style.

If you like scaring grannies, mothers and small children in carparks, as well as having a SUPER predictable diff, then go the 2-way :P

Pretty much as bubba has stated.

For a daily i personally would not get a tight mechanical diff. I put a regular old nismo 1.5 way in mine, and though it did the job for the track and skidpan duties the car got, it made me dislike the car as a streeter. Nothing wrong with the diff, i still have it in my s13 track car.

For a streeter i'd get a nismo pro 1.5 way and adjust the preload to soft for daily duties. Plus there is always redline friction modifier to make it a bit nicer as well.

As for breaking drive shafts; If you drag it with sticky tyres you will break a drive shaft at some point. Upgrade to the gtr centre and shafts if that is the case.

Edited by badhairdave

For a streeter i'd get a nismo pro 1.5 way and adjust the preload to soft for daily duties.

this but get the pro tt model and leave the preload in the middle.

mine has seen 300rwkw for 2 years and never missed a beat. it's not a hastle for daily driving at all

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...