Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

pretty sure they do a copy of a 3037..its 1.5k though

NO..... Damn man dont spread rubbish like that..

They sell a REAL 3037 with a Kando rear housing for 1.5k, its a great price.

sandy vag?

Thats right, i only saw it once and my memory aint so great

Though technically a 3037 should have a HKS badge on it :P

tell ya what i was thinking too scott..ya know that dud turbo on my car, why dont i put a 3037 comp wheel on it they are pretty cheap..you reckon it would fit...?

my Garrett GT3076R had a GT3037 ID ... it was on the CHRA

+1. The "37" refers to the GT37 series impeller, been rehashed and explained numerous times in various threads. Garrett make them, Garrett name them, and HKS stayed with the naming convention when being supplied those units.

I wouldn't expect to see any HKS naming on something Kando supply.

sandy vag?

Thats right, i only saw it once and my memory aint so great

Though technically a 3037 should have a HKS badge on it :P

tell ya what i was thinking too scott..ya know that dud turbo on my car, why dont i put a 3037 comp wheel on it they are pretty cheap..you reckon it would fit...?

LOL yeah someone else already said it, HKS box or Garrett box = same product. The HKS one says HKS on the comp cover but eh yeah... same same.

As for whacking a 3037 comp wheel on, sick idea. You will need the comp cover to match. You could send it to Stao and he would be able to fit the wheel and supply the new cover. Would need to be rebalanced.

But then youd look like a goose with a lazy 300kw when you had the opportunity to have an AWESOME!!!! 300kw lol.

Cmon man just try

yeah i am gunna do the kando dont stress..Its all set to go :thumbsup:

i was originally going to change the wheel on this one as you know but hought it would have to be balanced..i have recently been informed there is no need to balance it just bolt a new wheel in and go, a 3076 wheel is only 50 on ebay...a 3037 is 120....I could of done that..so my question was more hypertherotical ..

Yeah definitely need to balance it.

Dont forget the old T4 76mm and the GT37 76mm are different dimensions other than OD. You would need the housing too.

If I was to do it I really would just send it to HG

Hey Guys,

Been thinking about getting a TD06SL2-20G, but have come to the conclusion i prob would want more repsonse so sent Eiji an email asking if he could do a TD05-18G in t3 flange. He came back with this response.

What do you guys rekon? Would the turbo be a compromise and should i just wait for the actual T3 model to be released towards the end of November? Plus would it give me much more response over the TD06? And i assume it would have the V-band on the exhasut housing still?

Hi,

Our T3/TD05H turbine housing is not available yet until end of Nov.

I have a genuine MHI TD05H-12G turbo with 8cm housing as this listing.

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Turbocharger-Genuine-KUBOTA-V4702-Tractor-TD05H-12G-49178-03200-T3-8cm-New-/280763620494?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item415ed0dc8e#ht_2093wt_1185

I can upgrade it to TD05H-18G for you if you don’t wanna wait.

It will look like the below turbo.

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Kinugawa-Turbocharger-3-Cover-T3-8cm-V-Band-Housing-TD06SL2-18G-/290622631545?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item43aa756e79#ht_2686wt_1185

Unit price will be AUD 799 to door.

I could offer oil-cooled bearing housing and water-cooled bearing system as well.

If you wanna wait the 8cm/TD05H turbine housing,

Please let me know your email that I could contact? you when it is available in the future.

Regards

Eiji Takada

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
    • ..this is the current state of that port. I appreciate the info help (and the link to the Earls thing @Duncan). Though going by that it seems like 1/4 then BSP'ing it and using a bush may work. I don't know where I'd be remote mounting the pressure sender... to... exactly. I assume the idea here is that any vibration is taken up by the semiflexible/flexible hose itself instead of it leveraging against the block directly. I want to believe a stronger, steel bush/adapter would work, but I don't know if that is engineeringly sound or just wishful thinking given the stupendous implications of a leak/failure in this spot. What are the real world risks of dissimilar metals here? It's a 6061 Aluminum block, and I'm talking brass or steel or SS adapters/things.
    • And if you have to drill the oil block, then just drill it for 1/4" and tap it BSP and get a 1/8 to 1/4 BSP bush. The Nissan sender will go straight in and the bush will suit the newly tapped hole. And it will be real strong, to boot.
    • No it doesn't. It just needs an ezy-out to pull that broken bit of alloy out of the hole and presto chango - it will be back to being a 1/8" hole tapped NPT. as per @MBS206 recco. That would be for making what you had in alloy, in steel. If you wanted to do just that instead of remote mounting like @Duncan and I have been pushing. A steel fitting would be unbreakable (compared to that tragically skinny little alloy adapter). But remote mounting would almost certainly be 10x better. Small engineering shops abound all over the place. A lathe and 10 minutes of time = 2x six packs.
×
×
  • Create New...