Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

He is Scott, i'm getting him around here tomorrow to get the dump/front/screamer made. I will weld the turbo to his manifold so he can't change his mind again. lol.

a little tack weld around the back side of the flange cant hurt LOL!

^^^^i have no idea what any of that means, but I like the pretty colours...lol^^^^

anyways, spent all day fixing stuff up on the car...well Scott did mostly ,I kind of gazed into space most of the day from my lack of sleeping this week...Thanx mate :thumbsup:

So just get some Injectors from a more reputable supplier that flow more than 300cc and we done, ready for a tune..

Now I'm off to sell my ass to pay for it all >_<

any thoughts of the TD06SL2 w/ Garrett 60-1. Same 11 blade (trust spec) rear wheel and 10cm housing, but with a comp wheel is more like the size of 25g. 3 inch inlet, and the comp housing dosent look to be as big as the t67, so should be able to low mount on standard manifold without too many problems. if the 20g falls short of 280rwk + on 98 (waiting for jez or artz thumbsup.gif), shorely the bigger comp wheel could get it around the 300 mark. Or would it be too laggy (mismatched) and not worthwhile.

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Kinugawa-Turbocharger-3-Anti-Surge-TD06SL2-w-Garrett-60-1-T3-10cm-V-Band-Hsg-/290650010977?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item43ac173561#ht_2543wt_1185

Edited by dori33

any thoughts of the TD06SL2 w/ Garrett 60-1. Same 11 blade (trust spec) rear wheel and 10cm housing, but with a comp wheel is more like the size of 25g. 3 inch inlet, and the comp housing dosent look to be as big as the t67, so should be able to low mount on standard manifold without too many problems. if the 20g falls short of 280rwk + on 98 (waiting for jez or artz

thumbsup.gif), shorely the bigger

comp wheel could get it around the 300 mark. Or would it

be too laggy (mismatched) and not worthwhile.

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Kinugawa-Turbocharger-3-Anti-Surge-TD06SL2-w-Garrett-60-1-T3-

10cm-V-Band-Hsg-/290650010977?

pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item43ac173561#ht_

2543wt_1185

Yeah I'm keen to find out as in WA we only have 98 and I would love to crack the 300 mark

most of their turbos with bigger comp wheels in the smaller .6 housing (same as my sl2) have surge slots...you can get the t67 with the .6 comp housing and it also has surge slots..

why, I guess because they have surge issues :unsure:

Hello I thought this may be interesting to some people. I have based my calc's off a RB30. with the following. 7k rpm max with the following load point marked on the compressor maps 3k, 4k, 5k, 6k & 7k

TD06H 25G looks good on the dirty thirty by your calcs ;)

Oh yeh forget to add a few weeks ago, Willal racing used to, and still does on there street gtr i think, run twin TD06 25G's on the os giken 3 litre motors, think they made'upwards of

650rwkw, the car went 8's at 160ish mph in the end, i remember the street car made 470rwkw on 20psi on bp ultimate 98 back in the day and ran

high 9's at 144mph in street trim, i think its on E85 now with a lot more power

street car

They were running twin 25G's but since the car now used for circuit work as well as an occasional hill climb they have switched to twin 20G's. They still have the 25G's and i assume that if Adelaide ever gets another drag strip they may make a return.

Still makes over 600kw on E85 with the 20G's though.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OX4aAw1vA9I

Edited by D_Stirls

Sounds like you hold some superficial value in mothers, would you like to buy mine?

I'll do you a good deal, just give me your car - you can then resell her for the one in the vid.

Think I have made up my mind and am going to order a T67. Anything I should keep in mind when placing the order?

Looks like the T67 doesn't come with lines like the 20G does, do Kando have something to suit? What have others done?

Sounds like you hold some superficial value in mothers, would you like to buy mine?

I'll do you a good deal, just give me your car - you can then resell her for the one in the vid.

Ones enough,, i'm sure you mums a lovely lady but i really like my old lego block shitheap...lol

cheers

darren

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...