Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

in the exact post you replied to he said they are both 99 ron lol

Tony de you would probably find that the 5% ethanol wouldnt be that great... while ethanol has good ping resistance it is only seen in high quantities thus far, and it will probably be more consistent for u to run straight 99 as the ethanol will result in a leaner burn.

The E5 is also more likely to be a lower grade fuel and the RON bump is from the ethanol, again probably a mask in this case.

I would like to see atleast an E10 variant added to regular PUMP (98 RON in OZ case). Price would stay about the same but we could pick up some ping resistance and have a better RON rating.

so if i want 300rwkw out of a rb25

what would be better one of this kando turbos

or a garrett gt3076r 56t with 44mm external gate

both on a low mount without cams but all supporting mods

with bp98 fuel

Edited by jet2nv

ive had a read through it but theres over 100 pages from what ive seen i think im gonna go a 3076 just wanted some peoples opinions

Peoples opinion on what? a gt 3076 (which one??) or kando? or vs a kando? or vs a NA civic?

be more descriptive mang

Edited by Rolls

Peoples opinion on what? a gt 3076 (which one??) or kando? or vs a kando? or vs a NA civic?

be more descriptive mang

if you read the previous 2 post you would see what im asking i know theres different types of kando and 3076 but i want to know which oneis better for my stated power goal

For 300kw you will need a T67 from kando or the 3076.

The 3076 is likely to be 'more responsive', but once on full song it appears the T67 walks away and ends up with more power.

As a rule of thumb on 98 you should expect 280-300 from the 3076 or 300-330 from the T67 on roughly 20psi each. If you are planning to go external gate you should probably just take the T67 as they are freaking cheap but if u want internal you must get a 3076.

You can also look at a hypergear G3 (much cheaper than both of the above and is also a solid performer - close to 3076 numbers a little laggier).

yeah im extremely familar with stao and his turbos ive know him since he first started and tried ALOT of his different turbos yes they make good power reliable cheap but im more concerned about resale and response the turbo from stao which is very close to the gt3076r is pretty much the same price i get the gt3076 for i already have a dump pipe braided lines and everything ready for the garrett

so yeah i could sell it all and try but after trying a g3 and a gt3071 and the 3071 making 280 and super responsive i think the 3076 is the smarter way to go unless someone here has tried all 3 maybe lol as most motors/dynos are different

For 300kw you will need a T67 from kando or the 3076.

The 3076 is likely to be 'more responsive', but once on full song it appears the T67 walks away and ends up with more power.

As a rule of thumb on 98 you should expect 280-300 from the 3076 or 300-330 from the T67 on roughly 20psi each. If you are planning to go external gate you should probably just take the T67 as they are freaking cheap but if u want internal you must get a 3076.

You can also look at a hypergear G3 (much cheaper than both of the above and is also a solid performer - close to 3076 numbers a little laggier).

I dunno but the HG SS2 also looks to be in GT3076R territory, just my opinion..

A TD06H-25G is bigger than a T67. I may be going one of these on my Rb30. Just trying to decide on what config I will go. IE 10 or 12cm turbine housing, TD06 or TD07 compressor housing, Port shrouded or unshroaded and cast or billet compressor wheel.

any 1 wanna put there POV forward?

Edited by urtwhistle

A TD06H-25G is bigger than a T67. I may be going one of these on my Rb30. Just trying to decide on what config I will go. IE 10 or 12cm turbine housing, TD06 or TD07 compressor housing, Port shrouded or unshroaded and cast or billet compressor wheel.

any 1 wanna put there POV forward?

12cm for Rb30....

cheers

darren

how laggy would a gt3582 with a anti-surge a/r70 wuth a .63 rear be compared to a gt3076r .82 if my goal is only 300-310rwkw max

welcome to the kando dynamic thread, where we talk about kando dynamic turbos.

Please ask a question about a kando product or go to the Garrett thread. There are a number of threads dedicated to gt30 based turbos where your question would be entirely relevant.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oh ok that makes so much sense. Thanks for clearing it up!
    • And these modern "environmentally friendly" EV vehicles also run on the same smoke! When the engine, wiring, or batteries let it escape it also stops running!
    • Yeah - I found the same information too.. 30% open is like 85% of flow etc. So it's probably going to be minor if not completely imperceptible. I also have a larger pod filter here, will swap that on and see if there's any difference. The hardest part is finding a place to uh, test this. It's quite noticable just how much having ducting to the otherwise completely open pod cools the intake temps down. It's better boxed, or shielded but driving for 30 seconds really makes it plummet to near ambient temperatures. I recall in the past when I was a RB land and had a nice flowing airbox -  - Then I took the lid off and put a pod there, and gained 9 psi of boost and about 60kw from the restriction I didn't know I had - with the controller at same duty cycle. However finding people using over the radiator intakes having similar KPA drops at WOT on built setups makes me think there restriction could be the exhaust or potentially the headers. Either way though, there's no real estate to play with and nothing that can realistically be done about it. The original dyno plot without the airbox, and the larger pod had a better curve. It was later I added the ducting and airbox, and a smaller pod to make it fit in there...
    • That's not completely truthful now is it? Any flex fuelled factory cars also had the option to run on steam.
    • Yeah so I guess your mechanic would know turnaround better than me....but I would have thought you had access to same day or overnight rack rebuilds there....any big city here in Australia has that service.   There are a couple of o-rings and seals involved, I guess the risk is the part is specific not general. Other option is if you can have it on stands in your garage for a while, steering rack removal is pretty simple (2 mounting brackets, 2 ball joints (separate by undoing the nut to the top of the threads, put a pry bar between the steering arm and control arm to put pressure on it then medium force on the side of the ball joint or top of the nut with a hammer to break it free) and then the trickiest bit is the splines to the steering rack (not too bad to undo, one nut then it slides out, but mark it first so you can reassemble it straight)
×
×
  • Create New...