Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Do we have any results here from this turbo? http://www.ebay.com....#ht_2463wt_1139

Same wheels and covers as all the T67-25g results... Only difference being the anti-surge cover (which may or may not make any difference) and the size of the shaft which should make no difference.

Ratio works as follows as we work back from the large engine will small turbo scenario.

48psi in exh manifold and only 10psi in inlet manifold works out to a ratio of 4.8:1 in theory if we were to try and get the same 48psi of back pressure in the exhaust manifold on the 2l we would need to have 32psi on the intake based on the 1.5:1 ratio (derived from testing).

ahh ok now I get ya, I was reading it wrong.. :thumbsup:

Same wheels and covers as all the T67-25g results... Only difference being the anti-surge cover (which may or may not make any difference) and the size of the shaft which should make no difference.

thats not what she said :P

I don't think it will make anymore power than it did before..

Possibly spool a little earlier and feel better/faster through the midrange though.How's your compression, holding up alright, have u gone new valve springs as well as cams?

Lies 600hp or bust! :yes:

If it went another 10-20hp up top and 20-30 through midrange I'll be happy... Hoping that 20psi will be similar to my old high boost without cams.

No valve springs, mine have been fine up till now.

Compression tests are for nancies :whistling:

Edited by SimonR32

I went to run cams without the valve springs but a few people scared me out of it without horror stories :/

Mine were fitted up this week with the springs and will be tuned possibly Monday, Good luck with yours!!! Hope the cams do make that sort of improvement!!!

The kando should be similar to 3076 yeah? I think thats what i read in your thread?

566hp at 1.7 bar (422kw) without correction

515hp at 1.3 bar (384kw) without correction

So it made an extra 40hp and we didn't even push it as hard, comes on about 350rpm sooner as well. I'll post up graphs tomorrow at work :)

also 590hp at 1.7 bar (440kw) with correction LOL

Edited by SimonR32

566hp at 1.7 bar (422kw) without correction

515hp at 1.3 bar (384kw) without correction

So it made an extra 40hp and we didn't even push it as hard, comes on about 350rpm sooner as well. I'll post up graphs tomorrow at work :)

also 590hp at 1.7 bar (440kw) with correction LOL

Woah!!! :O

Congrats on the results! Amazing!!!

Lies 600hp or bust! :yes:

If it went another 10-20hp up top and 20-30 through midrange I'll be happy... Hoping that 20psi will be similar to my old high boost without cams.

No valve springs, mine have been fine up till now.

Compression tests are for nancies :whistling:

love how this man thinks! nice power dude, 140mph here u come!

For those who mentioned getting poncams, i used a guy in the US that delivered a set for my NEO for about $625 or something..... So they are certainly great value for money based on the results above..... Not sure what they sell for locally but if anyone wants the details i can go find them :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...