Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

lol my bad probably should of checked from page 1 I started reading backwards for 20 pages or so.

lol nws, atleast you can cop the flack.

Page 185 has Simons most recent result, with a direct comparison T67 vs 3076R.. the only difference being the ethanol content of their fuel (but I doubt you need more than the Jew mix simon runs).

You asked your question 2 pages later, within the quoted 20 :P

lol nws, atleast you can cop the flack.

Page 185 has Simons most recent result, with a direct comparison T67 vs 3076R.. the only difference being the ethanol content of their fuel (but I doubt you need more than the Jew mix simon runs).

You asked your question 2 pages later, within the quoted 20 :P

Yeah saw that just brain was lazy and didnt click that the boost was in kpa instead of psi so wasnt making sense until I realised this and converted it lol.

WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! mines anti surge...ive never seen a garrett loose power from anti surge.. :unsure:

TD06 25G anti surge 50mm wastegate. better make me my 300kw on e85...damn kando bastards!

Edited by 51NNA

Well on Dori's car which is a head fck as it has some weird issue's.

It was laggier, and less top end. Wanted to ping at 240kw where as last time it was making 280kw on the edge. Lost 30 kw at 100kph also. Had the exact same surge issue as the non anti surge housing which we think is the profec playing silly buggers with us.

It wasnt until we went for a run on the road that i noticed it hitting the boost warning. Weird thing is the boost warning is set at 26psi and profec isoinly reading 20. So i turned warning up to 33psi and it didnt surge once on the road after that.

We couldnt find a bleed valve lying around as i lent my last one out to another customer during the week.

Only things changed since last tune where anti surge housing and the exhaust leak was fixed (other end of the plumb back pipe for external gate wasnt sealing) but is running screamer

well thats a mystery, I cant say ive ran Kando anti surges before but I have run alot of garrett anti's and the most ive seen is a 1-2kw loss, ill pull my cover off tomorrow and compare it to a garrett thats laying around.

Page 185 has Simons most recent result, with a direct comparison T67 vs 3076R.. the only difference being the ethanol content of their fuel (but I doubt you need more than the Jew mix simon runs)

Not the only difference, Simon's was running a bit more boost too if I remember rightly?

I'm wondering if I will have the same issues with mine then. I got a TD06H 25G with 3" anti surge housing. I',m wondering if I should have gone 4" from what your saying

you should be fine bro, that housing is an actual TD07 MHI spec item

the housing Jez and Dori are having issues with is a 'drilled' TD06 3" cover. The Trust style one that never came with drill holes in it normally lol

its a shame it didnt work though :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...