Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Is any one running a td05 16g on there rb20?

Looking at maybe getting one for my 20 for response I'm thinking it would come on around 3500 rpm mark?

Want to push around 220kw mark for a drift car !

Edited by colsil

Back in around 2006 my flatmate put an EVO3 TD05-16G onto his RB20DET on the stock manifold with an external wastegate plumbed up - made 20psi by around 3800rpm if I remember rightly, was awesome fun to drive though never got a final power figure for it unfortunately.

Here's the graph with your 17.5psi run Artz.

We should arrange a time to drive each other's cars (if you don't mind)... I struggled with the choice between T67 and TD06-20G for ages, so it would be good to drive a well set up version of each back to back.

post-32498-0-59053400-1346733930_thumb.jpg

Wow Except for that bit where you hit full boost , im still a bit on top.. until. 6k when im out..

Be a funny race , as long we get traction down the same you should power ahead when I change gear.

I would catchup when you change gear but I'd think you would stay well ahead..

I wasn't running out of legs on the straight at PI really, it was still pulling hard in 5th when I hit the braking zone..

We tried 20psi but it didn't make anymore power, intake temps starting going up. Might be different with a better intercooler. Trent said he was quite conservative with the timing though. Engine is also high on K's. Simon has shown the T67 will keep going with more boost, but this is the best we could safely get out of my setup. I'm not complaining though!

Yer I'm pretty keen on getting a kendo one maybe even go ex gate on STD manifold or just get a internal gate one just want a response turbo for drifting

Back in around 2006 my flatmate put an EVO3 TD05-16G onto his RB20DET on the stock manifold with an external wastegate plumbed up - made 20psi by around 3800rpm if I remember rightly, was awesome fun to drive though never got a final power figure for it unfortunately.

if u do go internal gate, get a T25 based one (the SR20 type) as the T3 ones SUCK. You will then need to get a T3-T2 adapter and make a dump to suit.

that being said, i dont think it would end up that much more expensive to just go external gate TD05H 18G T3 8cm.

HOWEVER, if talking making that sort of power your probably BEST off just getting your stock turbo rebuilt by hypergear. it will work out cheaper and the chances are you will get better results as you can tell him exactly what you are after, no hidden surprises. you say i want full boost by X and this much power, he will tell you what he can make to meet your targets or how close you can get to your targets with which turbo.

An update to my pretty minor but annoying saga regarding a missing oil line and complete lack of communication from Eiji - after some negative feedback he finally got in contact and we have finally resolved things (and I removed the negative feedback). I now have the missing oil line and things are all good :)

I don't think so, his last message indicated he was keen to do business again, so I think all is good.

I did notice all those feedback messages on eBay though where he states, straightaway, any issue (even if he is apparently to blame), BLOCKED! No soup for you haha. That's why I was worried about things initially.

Oh well, all sorted now.

Did he block you afterwards Justinn?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...