Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yeah, 226 pages later we have said plenty of times that the T3 internal gate kandos do not work. If you actually read the thread you will find results of ppl testing the iwg and that it sucked.

yes a 3071 is a good turbo, but just get a hypergear and save your money. Bolt with factory dump pattern.

an SS2 type B will be better than a 3071, based on specs.

this...

I have driven a 3071 Rb25 car (with a .86) and it was woeful to say the least and from what people say the .63 fails

admittedly i'm used to an HKS modified 3071 that is unbelevabley good.

IMHO go a smaller garret or ex gate

i just didn't feel the garrett 3071 was worth the money

I also think the cropped 3071 (HKS 2835) is an epic turbo for an RB. The delivery is brutal on an RB25, but I probably wouldnt go there on a 20. the bigger 60mm 3071 will be more responsive for the 20.

The Hyper Gear items are similar in spec to the garrett variants but Stao customizes the wheel sizes to be more application specific. The SS1PU and SS2 replace the 2871/GTRS and 3071 respectively, and is bolt on.

Mates, please advise: i have choice between Kando dynamics TD-06 20G and Hypergear 43 G. the cost of hypergear is bigger, but both of them are bolt on to the stock exhaust manifold.

could you tell me which turbo is better and why?

thanks

Hypergear is a bolton turbo, so it is far cheaper then Kando items counting installation costs. If you are comparing internal gate, stock manifold bolton performance its obvious that hypergear is a winner.Some of their latest billet turbos performed extremely well. They've released their billet version of TD06 SL2 20Gs that again appeared to be more responsive and punching out better no.s.

For a bolton turbo internally gated turbo for "Up to" 280rwkws I would definitly go for an hypergear item. Or if the decision is on a SL2 20G I would still go for a Hypergear's Billet 20G. for a 25G I probably go for a Kando item.

Put it this way, the kando internal won't work at all so you will need an external gate. By the time you pay 700 for a turbo and 400 for a gate, you are already nearing the cost of the HG. Then you still need to have your gate plumbed and dump pipe made which will cost over 500 easy.

you should make a responsive 260 on 98, 300 on E85.

Then you have the HG ss1pu. Complete bolt on, uses the factory dump pattern and all. no external gate, no dump pipes to be made. Just bolt on and make an intake pipe.

cost way less and still crack a responsive 250-270.

So had my rust bucket on the dyno the other night...

post-22242-0-91510700-1349330746_thumb.jpg

post-22242-0-85992600-1349330759_thumb.jpg

post-22242-0-38774800-1349332667_thumb.jpg

Old setup here: http://www.skylinesa...ost__p__6010134

Added ID1000s, billet comp wheel, poncams and re did all the pipe work in 2.5" stainless(was a mix of 2.25/2.5 before)

Tried more boost but it didn't really do much, perhaps a restriction somewhere (runs 2.5" cooler piping, 3" exhaust and stock throttle body) AFM was at max also.

Forgot to grab an overplayed map but if you put them side by side it looks pretty similar apart from the extra 30kw up top thanks to the cams(boost was almost the same). Most noticeable difference is how ridiculously smooth the thing cruises around with the ID1000's over the High-flows!

I love how these thing feel like your entering warp speed over 6000rpm lol, wants to keep rising even at redline.

Not sure what to make of the billet wheel though, perhaps the cams lost a little down low and the wheel brought it back up?? I think Simon will have to give one a shot so we get a genuine back to back.

Edited by battery

Thats on boost nice and early and making a healthy power figure battery :) I like your setup under the bonnet too. Neat and well presented.

Based on Stao's billet 20g results, I would say the billet 25g is also an improvement. I think all those parts come from the same supplier anyhow. So my logic is if they could improve the 20g im sure they also improved the 25g.

And if its warp speed at 6, you should rev it to 9 LOL!

Well you didn't exactly go backwards anywhere...

Hard to tell what made the gains, probably a mixture of both the cams, piping and billet front wheel.

Must be happy anyway, I'm guessing it still hauls ass!

No billet love for me, but I'm going to be selling my Green 32 very soon (if anyone is interested in buying PM me)

Edited by SimonR32

Yeh Trent seemed to think it would get to 380-390kw if we upped the rev limit, but im lazy and I'd prefer to not have to swap in another engine if the thing went bang..

LOL i can understand the logic, dont worry.

I wonder if theres a way you could shift the powerband to the left... I guess VCT would make that hard because you dont have as much control over the intake cam.

Well you didn't exactly go backwards anywhere...

Hard to tell what made the gains, probably a mixture of both the cams, piping and billet front wheel.

Must be happy anyway, I'm guessing it still hauls ass!

No billet love for me, but I'm going to be selling my Green 32 very soon (if anyone is interested in buying PM me)

No! Don't do it Simon!

PM sent..

So had my rust bucket on the dyno the other night...

post-22242-0-91510700-1349330746_thumb.jpg

post-22242-0-85992600-1349330759_thumb.jpg

post-22242-0-38774800-1349332667_thumb.jpg

Old setup here: http://www.skylinesa...ost__p__6010134

Added ID1000s, billet comp wheel, poncams and re did all the pipe work in 2.5" stainless(was a mix of 2.25/2.5 before)

Tried more boost but it didn't really do much, perhaps a restriction somewhere (runs 2.5" cooler piping, 3" exhaust and stock throttle body) AFM was at max also.

Forgot to grab an overplayed map but if you put them side by side it looks pretty similar apart from the extra 30kw up top thanks to the cams(boost was almost the same). Most noticeable difference is how ridiculously smooth the thing cruises around with the ID1000's over the High-flows!

I love how these thing feel like your entering warp speed over 6000rpm lol, wants to keep rising even at redline.

Not sure what to make of the billet wheel though, perhaps the cams lost a little down low and the wheel brought it back up?? I think Simon will have to give one a shot so we get a genuine back to back.

impressive result still , it knocks on the door of 200rwk at 3800rpm , why does it dip again for 100rpm?

you didn't exactly go backwards anywhere...

Hard to tell what made the gains, probably a mixture of both the cams, piping and billet front wheel.

I'm guessing it still hauls

I'd like to see an overlay. Might be wrong, but I couldn't see any significant differences at 4000, 5000, 6000, and 7000 rpm points although the shape of the curve between them may be slightly higher. I agree with Simon, it's obviously not gone backwards. But an overlay simply hightlights the advances.

The torque curve is showing a falling trend by 7000, and the bigger power number appears attributable more to a little kick in torque over the final 250rpm. Run under similar conditions with no other mechanical changes it would be hard to see the thing make the suggested power number simply through extra revs, but compromising your engine reliability would be a certainty at some point if you did.

All said, the result is certainly good, and dyno numbers can't be expected to convey the difference in feel as the engine runs through its speed and load ranges. Well done overall Battery, and I bet it does haul. Hope you intend tracking the car, not just dyno or 1/4 mile?

So pulled my TD06 of today..

Exhaust Side;

Exducer: 66mm

Inducer: 59mm

Running off this site; http://website.lineone.net/~jon_ed/Turbo_Table.htm.

Does it look like I have a TD06SH-20G (factory internally gated)

Bugger, that is the big bad boy rear turbine. So not the smaller turbine that most people run on a 2L or people here are using on their T67 etc.

From what I can see on the Kando website they only do a T25 8cm housing for that turbine. So you still need to do an adaptor for T25 to T3....then still running the biggest turbine you can run in the TD06 range.

May be best to give that turbo the flick to an RB25 owner who wants punchy 260-280rwkws that hangs in there nicely in the higher rpm

Bought myself a GTR, so I'm planning on going broke haha

Last weekend before I'm going to put it up for sale I've been playing at powercruise :)

Just to give people some idea how much abuse this consists of check this out

Peakvalues.jpg

2 bar and 8900rpm :) Both were spikes but it still loves it

As far as reliability goes it's been nearly 2 years and the car has not had a single breakage since I put the RB25DET and Kinugawa turbo on.

Edited by SimonR32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...