Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I only mentioned the 6 bolt outlet as an option as we are considering costs. staying 6 bolt will mean 1 less thing you need to change, hey HG regularly makes all the options with simple V band outlets or similar.

PM Stao about a price, it may be better than whats on the site.

For 220-240kw I personally dont think the T04E would be on the marker for performance, which is why im making the recommendation I am (and believe in it so strongly). If you were aiming for upper 200s it would possibly be worth the gamble. I do have faith that there still is a place for the T04E in the market, yet not many people will agree.

If you havent read I own an SR with an SS1PU which produced a respectable result, within what your actually looking for. Being an SR the result wouldnt be identical, but you should get a reasonable idea. Jez also tuned an SS1PU on an RB20 with the stock log manifold and made an easy 225kw from memory.

yeah i'm a little confused too Roy, the date on the paper is same date I got mine tuned yet neither graph looks to be mine, as mine seems to fall somewhere inbetween the pink and blue....its actually closer to the pink but with a bit more boost and im topping out earlier..Im wondering if the standard manifold is helping create a little more torque in my midrange as well..

and why is Staos car 10kms slower at 6060rpm??

:rofl:

different car look at folder name, unbelievably i did two that day i think it was Harris's car. i will check.

575070_10151619830610693_713727934_n.jpg

lol, if you want cheap and goodv i have a new kando td05h-18g...will make the power you are after and be pretty mega respoinsive. you just need to buy bthe exhaust housing fo $150 and you have a $600 brand new turbo to givev fabricator to mount gate on housinhg

  • 2 weeks later...

its Staos billet t67. Artz i only changed because im wanted to go highmount, was jealous of everyone elses exotic exhaust notes at the track lol. was goin to use the 20g but i cbf with water lines plus another 50wkw wouldn't hurt.

Do they run the same core and bearings. materials etc as Trust turbos? Its like people that say you dont need to run coolant lines to the turbo even if they have them. I feel the designed built the turbo with the expectation that 90deg water temp woudl be flowing though the core so selected materials, tolerances etc to suit the coolant and the oil.

My turbo has now done almost 70,000kms over 9 years and it was a second hand turbo off a friends 9sec Jap GTR. No problems with it. If you can get that sort of reliabbility ouot of them then AWESOME!

lol easy now.

im not suggesting that the kando will be as good as the trust item. It may be, or may not be. No one knows.

I'm just saying that in theory the Trust items do fine without as has Simon, so I would not be fearful of running an oil only core.

Well. while engine's running, oil washes the bearings and shaft all times which takes the heat away. So the bearings are not much hotter then the actual engine oil. The only reason bush bearings are made out of brass or browns and some in aluminium is because it doesn't stick or rust together with the steel shaft and bearing housing. None of the BB or bush turbos trailed on my car has been water cooled, Both me and Trent thrash the crap out of them on high boost as a part of testing, and I have not seen one fail.

Garrett BB must be water cooled, but not all BB require water cooling, it depends on the bearings how the setup of the chra system.

lol easy now.

im not suggesting that the kando will be as good as the trust item. It may be, or may not be. No one knows.

I'm just saying that in theory the Trust items do fine without as has Simon, so I would not be fearful of running an oil only core.

LOL, sorry. Was that too strongly worded? Sorry :( Trying to type fast before I get cauight playing on net vs working :)

its Staos billet t67. Artz i only changed because im wanted to go highmount, was jealous of everyone elses exotic exhaust notes at the track lol. was goin to use the 20g but i cbf with water lines plus another 50wkw wouldn't hurt.

Since this is about TDxx related thread so I will post all TDxx related results here including the turbochargers that we've built.

The ATRSL25.5 (HG re-engineered T67), just maxed out at 399rwkws on mine with stock cams. Tried every thing to get that extra 1kws to crack 400 and it just won't do it. Still the highest on Trent's library for stock headed Rb25det.

power.jpg

boost.jpg

Looks laggy but it is very fast on the road. How ever for a street car the ATR43SS2 and ATRSL20.5 is a better performer.

10cm turbine. I originally wanted 400rwkws out of this within usual rev range. So it is on the large end. I'm building one more in 66mm, which should drop it back to around 380rwkws mark before 7000RPMs while gain 200RPMs of response. Alternatively have a look at the new roller bearing G3 and SS2 see if that is a better turbo for what you need.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...