Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Both those graphs are my 20G. I dont have results for my 18G. I gave it to a friend who is going to run it on his SR20 Cortina :)

The Plazmaman plenum is actually laggier than std but the curve doesnt nose over at the top. For me I wouldnt put a plenum on an RB20. You lose torque and the only way they end up faster is if you absolutely flog the guts out of them with revs. I used to use 8,800 in 1st, 2nd and 3rd gears and about 8,000 in 4th gear. If you care about the life of your engine I am not sure that is a good recipe for a std engine with std oil punp etc etc and 23psi

No worries!

In the case of the 18G I have done I honestly feel that the stock position housing could be holding it back somewhat. I have no evidence to back this up though. It made roughly 210kw with ease on a Mustang dyno. I've noticed knock here and there recently so may speak to Jez about a touch up on his current dyno.

You make me wish I'd gone a 16G6 on that car though :)

Yeah, I had figured that I'd rather a 16G6 + TD06 housing than a stock position 18G for the same reason - the 18G is rated at around 40lb/min, the late 16G6 compressor maps show ~41lb/min at 2.4 pressure ratio, so it has all the flow we'd need at the boost range we'll be working with.

Lith stop giving me regrets! LOL it seems the 18G is obsolete, unless its completely application specific.

Kane the graph looks tops :) Good stout power for an RB20. Keep it on the boil and that would be a very quick car.

Stao should make bolt on TD05H 16G6 turbos for RB20s the same way he used the T28 housing to make his SS1PU.

The revs and road speed dont quite match my run on a Mainline dyno with std diff and 235/40/17" RE55 semis. My road speed and revs match up prety well according do the AiM dash so I suspect your car may actually be a little more responsive as I suspect the revs are calculated from road speed? so perhaps a tad wrong with the rpm? I dont know how the Mainline dynos work out rpm.

Did Jem seem to think cam gears are a good option? I would be doing that years before I think about putting a FFP on a car

Ordered a td06 20g 10cm for my s2 rb25 now I have sold my other turbo that I wasn't going to be happy with the out come. Staying pump fuel for the time been and hopefully pull 300kw out of the old girl but ill find out in time, still have a a lot to do before the tune next year sometime but I can't wait to see the results.

Does anyone know if kando dynamics do front housings on their own?

I know they do rear housings, because i was thinking of changing a XR6 turbo to a the larger .70 front housing and then using the smaller .82 rear housing rather than the 1.06 they come with stock to compensate for the lag on the larger front. Just hope he .82 won't be too small for the 4L.

There is very little lag with the larger front imo, it simply slows the air speed down a little in the outlet pipe due to the extra area. I have an aftermarket 0.7 housing here for a GT35 if you want to try it out before swapping the rear.

AFAIK Kando don't sell a 35R front housing on its own, and from memory the XR6T CHRA isn't a normal GT DBB core... So the backing plate on the front housing MIGHT be different. I really stress the might...

In terms of lag, I believe only initial spool up from idle/cruise conditions will be effected and only a minor amount. To my knowledge the larger housing will actually have better boost recovery (response when at speed).

That being said, you should hit up Scotty for his :)

Does anyone know if kando dynamics do front housings on their own?

I know they do rear housings, because i was thinking of changing a XR6 turbo to a the larger .70 front housing and then using the smaller .82 rear housing rather than the 1.06 they come with stock to compensate for the lag on the larger front. Just hope he .82 won't be too small for the 4L.

check with Stao?

mates, please help me.

so there is a big chioce of TD06 types turbos with anti surge, 15G 20G 25G and so on. but as I understand all these needs the wastegate (better then actuator), custom manifold and down pipe - am I right?

second question - if to choose the TD06 series - which model is the best one(minimum lag, fast spool, optimal for rb25det neo)?

and the last question - doen anybody have experience with bolt on one (dyno graph, feedback) : http://shopping.kinugawaturbo.com/upgradeturbochargerrb20detrb25detwstage3turbine68mmcomp450bhp.aspx

40101035001A.JPG

i checked the size of compressor and turbine - they are similar to Greddy TD06-20G:

http://www.ztechz.net/id1.html

The only one that is a 'bolt on' turbo is the one you linked. It is a T04E stage 3 turbine with what appears to be a 20G compressor. It has been hypothesized that it will make a good highflow and fall between the performance of a GTRS or 3071. So likely to achieve 270kw when pushed and reasonable response.

However, we are yet to see an actual result from it. I believe one was posted to FB at some stage but it hasn't made its way to this thread yet.

If you looking at something of highflow level have a look at a Hypergear. The highflows he does are tried and proven, with countless positive results and good feedback. A safer bet IMHO. His thread is on the main page like this one.

Have booked the dyno to tune my mates S14 with a 8cm TD05H-Evo3 16G on flex fuel, we will go to full E85 and at this stage may go up to around 20-21psi. Will post results for that when it's done.

Do people realise (or have any thoughts) on the sentiment that the Evo3 16G is often considered to flow similar to the 18G? This fact was part of the grounds we chose the Evo16G compressor over the 18G though will soon enough know if that was folly. So far it happily pumping enough air to keep the SR20's thirst for air quenched, so seems good so far.

Also, I had previously posted ~3700rpm for full boost - that was rolling on throttle, later testing showed that it gets 19psi by 3500rpm in 3rd gear and holds power nicely past 6000rpm, compared to the old PE1420 which hit a wall before 6000rpm.

This turned out to be a very frustrating day on the dyno - after doing plenty of testing on the road before booking the tune etc, the thing decided to be a dick on the dyno and we lost a good couple of hours trying to resolve a major boost creep issue that we had never seen before. We ended up giving up on doing that with paid for dyno time (quite hard to secure a booking for this kind of thing) so we decided to try and make the best we could of the situation, which ended up being able to hold roughly 16-17psi up to 5800rpm and then try and get the boost control sorted later, then just tidy up the last bits of fuelling on the road as the main purpose of the dyno was really to get a picture of what timing the engine wanted on a variety of different loads and ethanol blends - which we achieved.

End result on E77 was 250kw @ 5800rpm running about 17psi with full boost at 3500rpm on a 9 second run which is pretty decent, I reckon. Power was still climbing with more rpm, so if we could have held 17psi the full way it would have made more than 250 at that boost level... and it was also very keen on power gains with more boost. We saw over 270kw on 20psi with soft timing at just over 6000rpm before we gave up on trying to tame the boost control, so there is plenty more power in this setup.

Unsure at this stage whether the issue is a Kando Dynamic quality issue or if something else in the setup decided to be funny, will update if it turns out to be a Kando fail however it must again be noted that the car never previously had a boost control issue - though it does sound like it may have developed a few days before the dyno and at the time the owner thought nothing of the cut out he experienced thinking it was something else.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...