Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

sorry dale I don't like to post dyno graphs, as my tuner ramps the car up different to avoid horrible wheel spin and the graph seems laggy if that makes any sense 2 you? so dnt want to start a shit fight.

but on the road it comes on a lot sooner then what the graph shows.

and old tune was actually 442 at 22psi. now 485 at 22 lost around 30hp in mid at 4500rpm but obviousily gained 40hp up top. pickup car this morning so see how it drives soon.

peak power went from 6600rpm to 7200rpm

What cams are you using?

camtech 272 9mm lift, purchased package thru lewis engines in SA

Make sure your cams have been dialed to the lobe centre Camtech recommend.

I recently had an issue with their product where they admitted to me that they grind as close to the stock base circle as possible, and that it is the customers responsibility to dial the cam. Camtech cams are NOT drop in.

well speaking of that, Iam getting a weird noise from my left tappet cover :( but in saying that, I got the camtech 272 custom made with vct still which allowed me to use the stock inlet cam gear, on another note the exhaust site has an adjustable cam gear. which wasn't dialled in.

Edited by methz

I don't really have access to Hypergear's services, it would mean taking my car off the road for several weeks and shipping it to them and back. I had heard that enlargening the internal gate was common these turbos, how hard is it to actually do? There are several machine shops around here that could probably do it.

well speaking of that, Iam getting a weird noise from my left tappet cover :( but in saying that, I got the camtech 272 custom made with vct still which allowed me to use the stock inlet cam gear, on another note the exhaust site has an adjustable cam gear. which wasn't dialled in.

The stock intake gear is adjustable.

I recommend you contact Camtech and ask them where peak lift should lie for each cam. You can then get a degree wheel and dial them in.

oh ok thanks for that, might have to book in with my tuner get him 2 sus it all out after powerplay. but for now, car is on full song at 4500 and pulls pretty good specially up top. and idles nearly factory.

  • Like 1

There are bolts on the back of the gear, its adjustable just like an actual adjustable camgear is.

Yep, except you have to take it off to get to the bolts. Its like nissan just want to annoy us!

LOL am not 100% sure about this but I THINK you can remove the rear dust cover which will give you access while your working. Then mark the belt and the gears after its all timed right and reassemble.

I have not tried this personally, am just going off my knowledge of what the motor looks like as you pull it apart.

Haha yeah but you do that before you adjust it, then use the dial gauge to adjust it and f**k around, then put it all back together.

A bit of a procedure but it will save you taking the pulley off every time to adjust :)

Just use a paint pen to mark the belt and gears before you take them off, should be fine!

I hope they strapped it down properly, apparently HPF don't bother strapping cars down at dyno days as I found out yesterday. :/

I wonder if that's the reason some people never get the figures the are chasing? Wheel spin can give some very weird results...

I never got around to putting it on dyno :( my third gear is pretty much stuffed lol, crunches going in and down shifting, its horrible, only got 1 run at test n tune due to drag car flipping in the deep end, done an impressive 2.6 60ft and 3rd took 4 times to go in crunching :( haha, 13.0 at 122, guess i didn't beat my 12.3 at 120 from couple yrs ago grr, if i got 3rd it woulda gone 125 easy :( all in all, drove 1000kms, flog it all weekend, 8000rpm all day long in 35 degree temp, and got me home :)

Bugger, sounds like a frustrating weekend :( 122mph with issues is certainly moving though! What changes has it had since it ran 120mph?

Glad it at least survived the trip. As an aside, there is a turbo builder in NZ (who isn't necessarily the most stand up in terms of honesty at times - makes it hard to know what to believe and what not to) who has been trying extinguish any interest in the Kando turbos presumably before they get too popular, saying they tend to fail before you get any good use out of them. I haven't seen any evidence of this anywhere yet, but figured on this large a community it should be a mature enough trend here to get a reputation one way or another. Has anyone actually had one fail, or even get a bit sad yet?

Drags this weekend coming, can't wait to see what the 16G setup does - I should add that the turbo is not "all in", boost is limited to what can be safely run with a 2.5 bar MAP sensor

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...