Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Warranty is the biggest issue here having to pay $160 for postage and then another $160 if u don't want your turbo to be abandoned in case the workshop in Taiwan is closed then the most likely chance of paying a further $350 when they decide not to warrant the warranty. I think taos ss3 makes more power and response then these anyway and is in Australia. Well around around the corner for me, which makes everything everything that much easier and safer just a word of warning for anyone wanting to get one

Always worth updating the thread - interesting to hear, though strange it's contrary to years of use by people here! A mate had to return something along the line too, when they supplied an 18G instead of a 16G - and they sorted him out quickly... the customer service for folks I know overall hasn't been bad, did they give a reason as to why they didn't honour the warranty?

In some cases I would potentially take Hypergear more seriously as an option if I lived in Oz too, but in NZ Kando Dynamics makes more sense cost wise and in terms of knowing what you are going to get.

The comments seem to indicate that warranty has been honoured in each instance - correct?

Consumer having to wear the $160 shipping cost is not so good but if Kando have rebuilt/repaired at their cost I feel it's hard to have a gripe.

360 degree thrust bearings have been the way to upgrade turbo reliability since Adam was a boy - I seem to recall there is some sort of option along those lines available from Kinugawa?

Good good :) Occurred to me recently a lot of people seem to be getting failures over there and I was shocked to find "no BOV" was a trend in Oz. AFAIK (could be wrong?) thrust bearings get hammered when you get compressor surge, which would be massive without a BOV.

Good good :) Occurred to me recently a lot of people seem to be getting failures over there and I was shocked to find "no BOV" was a trend in Oz. AFAIK (could be wrong?) thrust bearings get hammered when you get compressor surge, which would be massive without a BOV.

A lot of people getting failures? Or people getting a lot of failures? :ph34r:

  • Like 1

Heard of 2 people today having exactly the same problems with a td06. Seems like the first few batches at at the start where made perfectly then once his name got bigger the quality control has gone down hill. Happens a lot with a lot of big brand stuff

I get to work on them often, the shaft and bearing below came off a Kando T67 sent in last week, like I've mentioned earlier. This issue happens to T67 or those larger billet L2 based cores working with Rb25det engines on high boost. When compressor out flows turbine creating way too much back pressure.

bearings.JPG

That's interesting. Any theory on why SimonR32 (first post: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/347726-kando-dynamics-turbo/) has been running the T67 25G for years without issues?

Thanks for providing input - I would definitely like to know if reliability has changed or is worse than previously evidenced from this thread, as I definitely don't want to be recommending a product which is going to cause people issues. In saying that, again I'm not like to recommend mismatched turbos to people anyway... so the likes of a TD05-16G6/TD06SL2-20G/TD06-25G should be comparatively safe?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey y'all! I'm curious about how y'all go about widebodying your cars. I noticed that when running a square setup, my front wheels are a bit more tucked in than my rear wheels. Not by much, maybe 5-10mm. This leads me to wonder - when I widebody, should I use narrower front flares and wider rear flares? I found a set of 40mm rear flares that I really like, and was thinking of pairing them with some 18mm front flares, but I don't want the car to look strange. How have others done this? Note, I'm in a sedan. Thanks!
    • And if it was anything other than an auto tranny part, it might be a problem. But seeing as all auto trannies belong in the recycling bin, it's fine.
    • I have an R32 Fenix rad. It is good.
    • All the schemas I can see, indicate your typical setup of ATF 'cooler' (read: heat exchanger) in the bottom radiator tank..ie; https://nissan.epc-data.com/stagea/wgnc34/5413-rb25det/engine/214/ ...but I can prattle on a bit here. These trannies have a thermistor in the sump ~ the TCU reads this and 1. bumps the line pressure up when the ATF is 'cold' and 2. prevents the TC lockup clutch from operating, until the ATF comes up to minimum operating temp (keeps the ATF 'churning' through the TC so it heats up quicker) -- trigger point is around 55C. In these conditions, the engine coolant temperature rises faster than the ATF temperature, and also helps heat the ATF up, which is why it's best to think of the in radiator tank setup as a heat exchanger ; the heat can flow in both directions... ...with these trannies, the 'hot' ATF comes out the front banjo bolt, flows through the cooler/heat exchanger, and returns to the box  via the rear banjo bolt. This gets a mention, due to the wildly different opinions wrt running auto trans fluid coolers ~ do you bypass the in radiator tank altogether, or put the cooler inline with the in radiator tank system...and then, do you put the additional cooler before of after the in radiator tank system?... ....fact is the nominal engine operating temp (roughly 75C), happens to be the ideal temperature for the ATF used in these trannies as well (no surprises there), so for the in radiator tank system to actually 'cool' the ATF, the ATF temp has to be hotter than that...lets say 100C -- you've got 25C of 'excess' heat, (slowly) pumping into the 75C coolant. This part of the equation changes drastically, when you've got 100C ATF flowing through an air cooled radiator ; you can move a lot more excess heat, faster ~ it is possible to cool the ATF 'too much' as it were...(climate matters a lot)... ...in an 'ideal' setup, what you're really trying to control here, is flash heating of the ATF, primarily produced by the TC interface. In a perfect world, wrt auto trans oil cooling, you want a dedicated trans cooler with builtin thermostatic valving - they exist. These should be run inline and before the in radiator tank system ~ when 'cold' the valving bypasses the fin stack, allowing the ATF to flow direct to the in radiator tank heat exchanger, so it works 'as intended' with helping heat the ATF up. When 'hot' (iirc it was 50C threshold), the valving shuts forcing the ATF through the cooler fin stack, and onto the in radiator tank heat exchanger...and you sort of think of it as a 'thermal conditioner' of sorts...ie; if you did cool your ATF down to 65C, the coolant will add a little heat, otherwise it works as intended... ...the 'hot' ATF coming from the front bango bolt, is instantiated from the TC when in use, so all/any flash heated oil, flows to the fluid-to-air cooler first, and because of the greater heat differential, you can get rid of this heat fast. Just how big (BTU/h) this cooler needs to be to effectively dissipate this TC flash heat, is the charm...too many variables to discuss here, but I just wanted to point out the nitty-gritty of automatic trans fluid coolers ~ they're a different beastie to what most ppl think of when considering an 'oil cooler'... /3.5cents   
    • Been a busy but productive day. Axle and hubs acquired. All fitted up after a bit of modifying. Need to sort out wider mudguards and running light reflector covers but other than that the trailer is gooood to go !!
×
×
  • Create New...