Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Its not like I'm going to do it every gear change. Just to launch it in first gear on the odd occasion

And yeah pretty much cause it sounds cool

Edited by stig mick

haha, yes i agree, redlining sounds mad, not like its bad for your car, when doing burnouts or you go drifting, you will hit redline a heap of times :D

just make sure you have a nice exhaust to go with it ;)

Well yeah kind of. I revved it to 7600rpm and got scared of doing damage so I took my foot off the throttle.

on my R33 it would go to exactly 7000 which was the redline and then bounce off the limiter in the R32 the redline starts with red dashes at 7000 then a solid redline at 7500 so I assumed the rev limiter should start at 7500

and for gods sake, do it when your engine is warm....... just saying, ive seen some people wreck their engines driving on the limiter when its cold.

also i think that every car with a ecu, at least ignition and injector ECU system has a rev limiter.

there was a bunch of chips being sold on the internet a few years back that removed limiter. ive personally driven an r32 gtst with (i can only assume) something similar.

it was pretty much stock except the thing revved right off the tacho. so above 9000 rpm. i couldnt find limiter lol.

car had many problems but amazing a spun bearing wasnt one of them lol.

EDIT

the bloke who owned it used to come on here. apex_sx or something like that

Edited by tm_r33

and for gods sake, do it when your engine is warm....... just saying, ive seen some people wreck their engines driving on the limiter when its cold.

also i think that every car with a ecu, at least ignition and injector ECU system has a rev limiter.

Of course I wouldnt do it cold, I NEVER take it above 2500rpm until the temp gauge is in the middle I'm sure the people who get stuck behind me in morning traffic are spun out that and R32 is being driven like a grandma but I want the engine to last.

Just out of interest If the limiter was removed would going just a tad over 8000rpm do any damage to the engine?

On stock internals?Then yes...eventually.

Nissan put a limiter on the max revs the engine will take,too risky going over it.

so just doing it once won't matter too much then?

if the limiter has been taken out i won't try it again

mine used to bounce at 7600-7700 with stock ecu. was slightly higher with nistue. but PLEASE keep it on the track!!!!!!!! on the street there is nothing more homosexual than wankers hitting limiter. its a true sign of a f**kwit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...