Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys looking at welding up my own log manifold for my R33. I have a Hypergear ATR43G3/ATG28G4 that is internally gated.

I don't want to buy an ebay manifold, and really can't afford a 6boost type manifold.

Looking at learning to weld(I have some welding experience) and creating my own.

Found this site that sells the needed parts http://www.expressparts.com.au/manifoldmaterials.asp

Was planning to buy the rb25 exhaust flange, 4 buttweld tee's,2 90deg elbows, 1 straight pipe for all the little joins and 1 T3 Flange.

Should i be using the 1 1/4" or 1 1/2" piping?

I have a spare stock exhaust manifold to make up a jig to get the turbo sitting in the stock position. Also plan on getting a dead head to help with construction.

Just wondering if any one on here has done this before and has any helpful hints.

I also plan to hake provisions for an external gate. Any tips on placement?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/349796-diy-log-manifold/
Share on other sites

How much power are you looking for?

I have bought a Sinco Customs manifold similar to the 6Boost and looking at the work that has gone into it even though I can gas and electric weld I wouldn't even think of trying to make one.

Stocker is good for 300kw or a bit more at a pinch. No need to make provision for external w/g as you can run it off the exhaust housing of the turbo when you get around to it.

As other have mentioned it would be pretty pointless, you will probably end up going backwards...

Plus you will almost surely end up spending more money and time than just buying a 6boost, but realistically... I would just stick with the stocker

PS. You can make 350rwkw with standard manifold, that turbo on the other hand might struggle

Edited by SimonR32

It's not re inventing the wheel. Its all about the tinkering and learning.

Stock manifold is good for 300rwkw my goal is around the 350rwkw mark.

you won't make 350rwkw with that turbo.

and that turbo won't max the stock manifold

Pretty sure the turbo will reach 350rwkw.Its not a high flow and the housings aren't too far of a gt35r with the .82 housing(Think thats the correct housing).

I was only considering building my own due to everyone on this forum saying the stock manifolds max out at 300rwkw.

My brother is a 1st class welder so i have the welding support if needed.

Edited by Crans

The cast HKS manifolds seam to do an OK job. Parts would only come up to $300. Was just an idea, lots of 4 cylinder cars seam to use log manifolds.

If everyone thinks its a bad idea i might just stick with the stocker for now and get a gate welded onto the housing

Why is it that everyone says the stock manifolds can only flow 300rwkw???

here is a dyno sheet of my stock manifold flowing well over that. granted its a hub dyno but would still

be making 350-360rwkw on a chassis dyno

post-32514-0-52955000-1294645006_thumb.jpg

If oyu are going to have a crack at making your own manifold, why not rotate the exhaust housing, but keep the turbo in the same location. That way you will be ablt to do a proper merge collector, but will not need to change intake piping or oil/water lines.

The cast HKS manifolds seam to do an OK job. Parts would only come up to $300. Was just an idea, lots of 4 cylinder cars seam to use log manifolds.

If everyone thinks its a bad idea i might just stick with the stocker for now and get a gate welded onto the housing

why when it is an internally gated turbo?

Why is it that everyone says the stock manifolds can only flow 300rwkw???

here is a dyno sheet of my stock manifold flowing well over that. granted its a hub dyno but would still

be making 350-360rwkw on a chassis dyno

post-32514-0-52955000-1294645006_thumb.jpg

Jesus! Whats the settup on that? So much mid range but then falls on its ass at 5500rpm

Looks like 3rd gear maybe?

Make sure you clean up the inside of the manifold before using it, had seen people with ebay or back yeard manifolds fallen to bits that chipped the turbine wheel. With the current turb you will need a .70 com housing with a 58 trim comp wheel to get upto 350rwkws at about 28psi on ron 98, which I can get that modified pretty cheaply.

You will find slightly cooler EGT with bigger manifolds and external gate for about 1~2 degrees of extra timing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
×
×
  • Create New...