Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What happens if I run 18 x 8? Should I be going 235/45/18 instead?

For M35's... (speedo values are based off the OEM speedo calibration for MY NM35)

STOCK RS

17" rims = 55 sidewall (total tyre height is 668mm) - speedo reads 10% fast

18" rims = 45 sidewall (total tyre height is 677mm) - speedo reads 8.7% fast

19" rims = 40 sidewall (total tyre height is 679mm) - speedo reads 8.3% fast

20" rims = 35 sidewall (total tyre height is 680mm) - speedo reads 8.2% fast

The ~10mm extra total height over the stock RS 17's fills out the wheel arch perfectly (particularly if you have lowered your suspension 20-25mm)

  • 1 month later...

For M35's... (speedo values are based off the OEM speedo calibration for MY NM35)

STOCK RS

17" rims = 55 sidewall (total tyre height is 668mm) - speedo reads 10% fast

18" rims = 45 sidewall (total tyre height is 677mm) - speedo reads 8.7% fast

19" rims = 40 sidewall (total tyre height is 679mm) - speedo reads 8.3% fast

20" rims = 35 sidewall (total tyre height is 680mm) - speedo reads 8.2% fast

The ~10mm extra total height over the stock RS 17's fills out the wheel arch perfectly (particularly if you have lowered your suspension 20-25mm)

oh on this i think for the arx its +5 on the sidewall for each..

mine are 19" with a 45' sidewall.

and against the informeter with a GPS HUD dispaly it was i think 3-4km out at 100km/h

oh on this i think for the arx its +5 on the sidewall for each..

mine are 19" with a 45' sidewall.

and against the informeter with a GPS HUD dispaly it was i think 3-4km out at 100km/h

Would probably work out the same for RS and RX's

but your running a 19 and a 45 sidewall

thumbsup.gif.....but I am running a 245 as well!....more width....higher wall!

I may even go to a 35 sidewall if the new diff's throw out my speedo!wacko.gif....more go!

Edited by Jetwreck

nup....standard size for the AR-X is 225/55 18"

Yes, I know... I was referring to the speedo accuracy.

Mine reads 10% high according to GPS, as have most other RS's I have been in, so adding the extra diameter will get the speedo reading close to what Aaron stated.

Yes, I know... I was referring to the speedo accuracy.

Mine reads 10% high according to GPS, as have most other RS's I have been in, so adding the extra diameter will get the speedo reading close to what Aaron stated.

oh....yeh the speedo is good in the AR-X until about 95km/h's....after that it out.....what's confusing is that the Infometer was spot on to my GPS.

Yes, I know... I was referring to the speedo accuracy.

Mine reads 10% high according to GPS, as have most other RS's I have been in, so adding the extra diameter will get the speedo reading close to what Aaron stated.

well yeh, if it makes any difference mine is a 235/45... which was lucky coz no chance am i getting a 245/45 under my guards at my height.

but yeh, comparing with scotts even, im kind of glad that my speedo is only 3-4k's out..

well yeh, if it makes any difference mine is a 235/45... which was lucky coz no chance am i getting a 245/45 under my guards at my height.

but yeh, comparing with scotts even, im kind of glad that my speedo is only 3-4k's out..

Rolling diameter, not tyre width :)

235 or 245 shouldn't make a difference to your speedo.

  • 1 year later...

ok so if i change the 265 for something smaller will that be ok. and i just read about roling diameter being different from front to rear am i going to have a prob with this? and i just found out the rears are 18x9.5 + 38 offset running 265/35/18 and the fronts are 18x8.5 + 34 offset running 235/40/18. is this going to cause probs?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...