Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Talked to the Link factory in regards to high revving RB26s and they say they reccommend an alternative triggering system. Doesn't apply to me as my RB30 won't be going over 6800 so I don't know what people are doing but there are two or three different approaches. I read about a year or so ago that Unigroup had such an alterrnative triggering system?

The Unigroup one is the one they developed with Ross. $2k (plus $1k fitting). It's happening in my car and another on here at 5500, so well before high revs.

I'm going to talk to CRD again today to see if I can find out more about what they do.

Edited by Scooby

mark - the way you fix your issue is take it to crd :)

a few of us here have heard this timing issue more than a few times with unigroup, however, jim @ crd has NEVER raised this sort of glitch with my setup (food for thought)

ive heard very good things about yavus though

Interesting read, I've never had this problem because my old R33 wasn't a power house, but I'm imagining that because of the massive ramp in RPM, the alternator could be producing sht loads of current and the rectifier isn't keeping the voltage flat.

Perhaps try soldering an inline capacitor to the +ve of the CAS or just run a big car audio capacitor to minimise voltage fluctuation.

Hope that helps.

Imagine people were just soldering on capacitors? $2 piece of silicon charging $500+

I don't think it's so much electrical interference as it is physical 'noise'. cas is rotating fast and if a bit worn etc gets problems. the other side of it is the type of ECU being used. some are definitely more prone than others. there is a cheap trigger disk solution, or the best fix is the crank damper pick-up but as stated above it's not cheap.

The Unigroup one is the one they developed with Ross. $2k (plus $1k fitting). It's happening in my car and another on here at 5500, so well before high revs.

I'm going to talk to CRD again today to see if I can find out more about what they do.

Is this what price im looking at to get my CAS fixed..? :S or is this a new one?

Edited by Aleckr33

The symptoms are described here in a thread from the Haltech forum:

http://forums.haltech.com/viewtopic.php?f=23&p=28152

and here

http://ljracing.co.nz/

Spoke to Haltech today, they said that their Platinum ecu has no problem handling the Nissan CAS signal but they're aware that some ecus do. Also read that somewhere that one got their hands on the patent for the Nissan CAS signal sensing and it was very impressive in terms of sophistication, so could probably work well with a 360 slot CAS trigger wheel.

Also Mark from Godzilla was as always very helpful, he hasn't invested in the trigger disc solution but has heard of it and was talking to Speedtech NZ who apparently have trigger discs made up. Then it's just a matter of telling the ecu to run 12+1 or 24+1 depending upon the wheel. Irrspective of who's solution it is, modifying the CAS can't be much mre complicated than that as there's not much in there.

Yeah Marko there's no doubt that CRD will know what to do, but I like to have some idea of what's being done to my car for future reference, no matter who does it, and at the moment they're not giving anything away. Respect their position but hey, it's my car.

Richard you refer to a cheap fix but do you know anyone who actually does this in Sydney?

Jack thanks for the tip re Red R, I'll get in touch.

Aleck no mate that's for a full crank trigger system that's good probably good for 10k ish rpm plus. Hence why I'm after what appears to be cheap and effective solution.

Edited by Scooby

could the trend be the ecu thats being used?

Most of the trigger issues are with particular ecu's not liking the nissan pattern.

Maybe post the ecu's (and engine combo) that are having the issues?

I can say its not inherent in nissan CAS's especially in these cars which are being mentioned.

A simple way to tell would be to just an oscilloscope on the CAS signal and see what it looks like at 7000rpm pre and post loom, if its clean on both then the issue must lie with the ECU.

Quick update, used another CAS and got to 6k rpm before the scatter appeared. As per Jack's suggestion got in touch with Red R Racing, Paul was very helpful and is sending down a CAS with a 24 (?) slot trigger wheel to try so looking forward to the results. Will post again when results are known.

Quick update, used another CAS and got to 6k rpm before the scatter appeared. As per Jack's suggestion got in touch with Red R Racing, Paul was very helpful and is sending down a CAS with a 24 (?) slot trigger wheel to try so looking forward to the results. Will post again when results are known.

Good stuff mate, it will be interesting to see if it eliminates the problem.

Keep us updated......

steam ftw

i have heard of CA's having the same problem, there is a data log file in the Haltech formus that shows the CAS signal from a CA that was inflicted with this issue.

EDIT!! Here is it.

logg497whpgv4.jpg

Wow, I really didn't think this was a topic that was soo miss understood.

Timing jitter is something that has plagued RB engines since the dawn of time. The worst is the 30 single cam.

Now fact of the matter is, you are measuring the crank off the camshaft. Now between the crank and the cam sensor we have......

A bearing that the sensor shaft runs on.

The shaft it self that goes in the camshaft.

A rubber belt.

Now, there is an easy way to diagnose if you have timing jitter. Lock your ignition timing. Grab a timing light and slowly rev your engine..... and watch the timing.

You will see as your belt gets harmonic vibrations so will your timing. Every RB does it. Just some do it worse than others.

Now, there are some fixes. using a dual pulse disk can help. It basically dumbs down the CAS so its not as accurate but helps jitter.

The best option is measure the crank off the crank. I have just been involved in making a bolt on billet kit for RB series engines. We started with a 72+1 then tried 72+1 with a missing tooth.

The problem we had was the sensor we where using wasn't fast enough to read it at 9000+ rpm.

We ended up with a 24+1 setup so RPM is never an issue and still more than enough teeth for accuracy.

I have personally seen engines sooooo bad that the timing marks disappear off the balancer.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok guys thank you very much. GCG highflow it is then 🙂 
    • forgot to mention that when it does this it does not kill the engine, but I have not kept the pedal down long enough to let it, as I see no reason to beat up on it as its got to be something simple, small and dumb causing this.  And as soon as I let off pedal, the engine returns to its normal super smooth operation and rpms re-stabilize quickly, once below 4k. 
    • neither stumble or cut really seem to be an appropriate term....hard to explain its like a rev limiter but at 4k, but it violently shakes engine and entire vehicle as the rpms will not rise over 4k, even with slow acceleration. as soon as it hits 4k, it sounds like entire spark is lost entirely. plugs were 1.1 which I used as such, but later put in new plugs gapped down to .8 changed back after issue arose when I replaced the coils, still does it with either plug gap...damn and it was all running so good.
    • Oh how times have changed! I actually lean it out relative to my water/methanol injector duty cycle. The methanol adds a lot of fueling and you can then lean it out even more due to reduced knock. 
    • Yeah my thoughts are the same, a well thought out WMI setup, would be slightly ahead of just straight E85 and you're also chemically intercooling the charged air, dropping it even further. This is why you need to add so much more fuel as soon as you spray. I remember someone taking me through their set up before (Dennis, has a R33, lives around Cabramatta - no idea if he's still around on this forum). He would target AFR 10:1 on 98, then as WMI ramped on, AFR would lean back up to 11:1. Amazingly, he did this all through his PowerFC, a relay to cut power to his EBC solenoid if there was not enough line pressure on his WMI kit. And of course, if there wasn't any boost made above gate pressure, you wouldn't be accessing the load cells with heaps of timing for WMI. One downside to that rudimentary setup, once the WMI came on, the EBC would unleash the dragon, and of course all the timing. Tyres would fry lol.
×
×
  • Create New...