Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok guys heres the story.

A few months ago i had a pretty stock R32 GTR.

Only mods where the exhaust, 33GTR N1 Turbos (not the BB type Garrett 2860-7) and a Boost controller. I Took it to the 1/4 mile and ran a best time of 12.997 @ 105mph.

Which i was happy with. Seemed right with those mods.

But then i decided to put a bit of extra stuff in. So i chucked in

2x Garrett 2860-7 turbos

Kelford 272deg cams + head work

Tomei cam gears

PE 750cc injectors

PE Kevlar timing belt

Walbro fuel pump

Tomei fuel rail

Stainless steel manifolds

Apexi dual intake kit

stainless steele radiator

Bee*R launch controller

and a power fc.

Got it all put in and the tuner did a rough Road tune with the PFC. He did suggest however that i get a dynotune. (but the powerfc i bought was already tuned for those turbos)

Now i just got back from the drags and after doing multiple runs, ran a best time of 13.451 @ 102mph. uughh. wtf?

Can anyone help me out?

Edited by NOCTIS
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/353439-spent-8k-on-mods-only-to-go-slower/
Share on other sites

edit: Hmm just had a quick look. And i found quiet a large split in the intake hose that runs into the intercooler from the turbos.

Which would make sense cos i found i was losing alot of power in the higher rev ranges.

shit...

Iv been driving the car pretty hard all week. hope nothing else have fkd up on it.

Edited by NOCTIS

I count at least 6 items on your shopping list that were not needed and wouldn't have improved your horsepower.

Get the car on a dyno and have a proper tune done if you want to realise the full potential of your new setup, hoping for the best with a used Power FC that you were told was tuned for a specific type of turbo is a royal gamble.

+1 cams too big.

Realistically It feels more like you have simply tried to tune the car rather than perform any significant upgrate. I see the -7s as a steel wheeled stock turbo, not SIGNIFICANTLY better (people will hate me for the comment) and you already had that as such with the N1 turbos.

The only other power getters I see are the cam gears, manifolds and intake kit. The only one actually doing some work IMO is the cam gears which is negated by the oversized cams. The manifolds and intake kit would yield minimal results at best with the -7s.

All in all I would expect the current setup to be slower than if you had simply added the PFC + camgears.

Not to be a prick or anything, I hope you take the above as constructive and make some minor revisions to your efforts. Goodluck.

tuner did a rough Road tune with the PFC.

He did suggest however that i get a dynotune.

Now i just got back from the drags and after doing multiple runs

srsly... wtf are you doing man?

I'm not after 500hp+ that's why I went with the -7. The 33gtr n1 uses journal bearings which don't spool as fast as the 34 n1's. I swapped the manifolds as it was something I might as well do while the turbos are out anyway.

All I want Is a good balance between response and top end at around 400ps. Which is what I would have thought the -7s and the cams wouldv given me.

And the tune isn't that bad at all for your information. I just got recommended to get it dynotuned to get the most out of the mods. Not because it's going to blow up in my face if I leave it on idle.

+1 cams too big.

Realistically It feels more like you have simply tried to tune the car rather than perform any significant upgrate. I see the -7s as a steel wheeled stock turbo, not SIGNIFICANTLY better (people will hate me for the comment) and you already had that as such with the N1 turbos.

The only other power getters I see are the cam gears, manifolds and intake kit. The only one actually doing some work IMO is the cam gears which is negated by the oversized cams. The manifolds and intake kit would yield minimal results at best with the -7s.

All in all I would expect the current setup to be slower than if you had simply added the PFC + camgears.

-7's a big improvement over the N1's... they're listed as R33 N1's not R34 N1's

cam gears need to be dialed in on a dyno too (as well as a PROPER tune, but that's already been stated)

You ran a 13.0 at 105mph so that's normal for a 32 GTR with an exhaust.

So just tuning those N1 turbos with an aftermarket ECU would have got you good gains.

Since you went all out - then you'll need a tune, especially with those cams. Don't expect anymore overall power from the cams with those turbos, just a shift to higher rev range and less torque.

Yeh im booking it in for a dynotune right now, and just ordered a new pipe to replace the split one. Yeh I dunno. I was just excited to have the car back I guess. So I couldn't help driving it.

So I'm back to driving the bunky around now.

yeah not exactly a good result. my 32 with stock turbos, stock manifolds, stock injectors, stock cams, stock intercooler, basically 100% standard except for a cat back exhaust, 1 bar boost, and a well tuned power FC ran a 12.4 qtr mile. GET IT TUNED asap. it should be mid to high 11s at this point.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...