Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

SR = Somethings Rattling

RB = Really Boring

CA = Carnt Arse

FJ - Farking Juicy

VG = Vagina Grabber

VQ = Vagina Quiver

some other makes...

Subaru:

EJ - Everythings Jiggling

Mitsubishi:

4G - 4 cylinders of Gay

Toyota:

1J - One Jerbil (yes the Japs can't spell Gerbil)

2J - Two Jerbils

7M - Sevenmotherfarkingheadgaskets

Suzuki:

G13B - is actually "leet" speak for GLEB which is short for Gay Lebs

Let me know if there are others you want to know about..

so WTF is an MA09ERT? I have one downstairs?

well Duncan my friend that motor code describes homosexuality at it's finest...

MA - March - favourite month of the homos as they get to recover from februarys mardi gras poundings..

09 - is actually 0.9 in reference to the faggy capacity of their fagmobile motors

ERT - Erection Riding Time - Describes their favourite past time..

and you have one downstairs you say? :)

You are most probably correct in saying this. CA18DET motors are Nissan's strongest rated factory motor horsepower-wise. Basically, out of any performance Nissan motor, they can produce the most horsepower without being re-built, somewhere around the 600rwhp figure, and part of this is due to fact that the CA18DET is a cast-iron block, while the SR20DET is an alloy block like that of the RB-series.

LOL I will give you 50 bucks if you can get a stock Ca18 to hold 600rwhp for a week.

well Duncan my friend that motor code describes homosexuality at it's finest...

MA - March - favourite month of the homos as they get to recover from februarys mardi gras poundings..

09 - is actually 0.9 in reference to the faggy capacity of their fagmobile motors

ERT - Erection Riding Time - Describes their favourite past time..

and you have one downstairs you say? :)

well played good sir

  • Like 1
  • 4 months later...

SR = Somethings Rattling

RB = Really Boring

CA = Carnt Arse

FJ - Farking Juicy

VG = Vagina Grabber

VQ = Vagina Quiver

some other makes...

Subaru:

EJ - Everythings Jiggling

Mitsubishi:

4G - 4 cylinders of Gay

Toyota:

1J - One Jerbil (yes the Japs can't spell Gerbil)

2J - Two Jerbils

7M - Sevenmotherfarkingheadgaskets

Suzuki:

G13B - is actually "leet" speak for GLEB which is short for Gay Lebs

Let me know if there are others you want to know about..

:laugh:

The RB30ET is based on the RB20ET as seen in some HR31 sedans and wagons. Obviously the 3 litre engine makes more sense for the export market as we have more long Freeways and the like and less tax and shit on higher displacement engines. If you look at the RB30ET though it is basically an RB30E with lower compression and the bolt on gear from the 20ET.

CA20's were fitted to S2 Blueys and weren't that good in stock form (I don't think they have a lot of potential either)

R31 Pintaras as well.

D = double overhead camshaft

E = Electronic FUEL INJECTION (not ignition!)

T = Turbocharged

The number is displacement rounded to the first 2 digits.

The letter prefix simply refers to the family of engines. Ignore it, and what you think it stands for, Nissan engineers probably got a 5 year old to point to 2 letters in the alphabet and went with it for good luck. Insert a myriad of other explanations for it, we aren't going to resolve what has been debated for years within the confines of this thread. In the end, who cares?

Was there anything JDM that used the RB30ET? If not I'd say it was completely Holden's doing. They did buy the rights to the RB30 from Nissan AFAWK.

T actually stands for factory turbocharger.

RB30ET was all holden AFAIK. wasn't the camshaft in the vl RB30 designed by holden as well?

Tommy kaira made a 30DET but that's about it.

and using nissans amazing engine identification system(excluding R and S), Its called FJ20DET :P

don't forget the ca18i, the most awesome engine ever produced by nissan. So awesome it doesn't follow the naming convention or need the twin plug stupidity of the ca20. It's bottom end is factory rates to 600ps but Nissan didn't want to unleash such an engine on the unsuspecting public so limited the power to 80ps with it's sohc rocker snapping awesome sauce head.

I'll see your CA18I and raise you a CA18S.

LOL I will give you 50 bucks if you can get a stock Ca18 to hold 600rwhp for a week.

EFI up here in QLD has had a 550 rwhp stock bottom end ca up and running for years and years, they slapped a 42r or some such thing on it for lols, bashed 30 psi through it, and have been unable to kill it yet.

Fkn useless for anything other than making 500 + rwhp on a dyno though!

post-21318-0-31100100-1311373222_thumb.jpg

LOL I will give you 50 bucks if you can get a stock Ca18 to hold 600rwhp for a week.

+1

The VQ motor Im running seems to be a strong fighter.

VQ25DET, factory unopened motor, throwing more than 300kw at all fours..

  • 2 weeks later...

from my understanding the rb30e was based on the rb20e

holden were going to release the 202 in the VL but the emision laws changed at the last second, holden then spoke to nissan australia and together they designed the motor based on the rb20e, and for marketing reasons, holden went with the mx7 gear box, and turbo, where nissan went with the n/a'd options and rb20 gearbox

toyota engine codes confuse the shit out of me though

nissan;

RB26DET R - ? ~ B - ? ~ 2.6 litre Dual ~ OHC T - turbo

2JZ-GTE - WTF? isnt this a 3 litre? its almost like someone was like "what do we call this?" smash the keyboard "that"

from my understanding the rb30e was based on the rb20e

holden were going to release the 202 in the VL but the emision laws changed at the last second, holden then spoke to nissan australia and together they designed the motor based on the rb20e, and for marketing reasons, holden went with the mx7 gear box, and turbo, where nissan went with the n/a'd options and rb20 gearbox

toyota engine codes confuse the shit out of me though

nissan;

RB26DET R - ? ~ B - ? ~ 2.6 litre Dual ~ OHC T - turbo

2JZ-GTE - WTF? isnt this a 3 litre? its almost like someone was like "what do we call this?" smash the keyboard "that"

JZ = engine code, 2 = 2nd generation of that motor, G = wide angle valve DOHC, T = turbo, E = electronic fuel ejection.

from my understanding the rb30e was based on the rb20e

holden were going to release the 202 in the VL but the emision laws changed at the last second, holden then spoke to nissan australia and together they designed the motor based on the rb20e, and for marketing reasons, holden went with the mx7 gear box, and turbo, where nissan went with the n/a'd options and rb20 gearbox

toyota engine codes confuse the shit out of me though

nissan;

RB26DET R - ? ~ B - ? ~ 2.6 litre Dual ~ OHC T - turbo

2JZ-GTE - WTF? isnt this a 3 litre? its almost like someone was like "what do we call this?" smash the keyboard "that"

Afaik holden didn't help design the RB30E nor did Nissan Australia design it originally. Afaik it was a design from Nissan Japan and possibly not necessarily based on RB20E as they may have been designed at the same time.

Keen to hear anyone's input on this.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...