Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My god I can't believe I only came across this thread now!

Amazing build quality and attention to detail. I think a lot of people don't realise the amount of time and money that goes into R&D and if you have the means to do so (judging by you owning a Z Tune I think your means are more than capable :P ) then why not.

Very eager to see how this goes.

Also can you go into a little bit more detail on the compressed air into the manifold via a port on idle? Never heard of this being done and sounds very interesting.

Great work :thumbsup:

My god I can't believe I only came across this thread now!

Amazing build quality and attention to detail. I think a lot of people don't realise the amount of time and money that goes into R&D and if you have the means to do so (judging by you owning a Z Tune I think your means are more than capable :P ) then why not.

Very eager to see how this goes.

Also can you go into a little bit more detail on the compressed air into the manifold via a port on idle? Never heard of this being done and sounds very interesting.

Great work :thumbsup:

Hi Phil,

Thak you for your comments.

The air fitting will be placed underneath the collector that will point to each side of the twine scroll entry turbine housing. This will be connected to a compressed Air cylinder in the car, and will be activated via a air solenoid at idle, this will spin the turbine wheel to form boost. An easy way to remove turbo Lag ( will only be used for drag racing).

If you need more info do let me know.

Very interesting! Is that something that you guys thought of or is it more commonly done? Only reason I ask is I have never heard of doing something like that to achieve an antilag system.

It has been used in the past by Rally cars in the olden days ( not sure if it was legal) Just like the bathurst R32 gtr used to use the fire extinguisher as a cooling agent for the intercoolers

Now thats a hard to come by item. I wouldnt mind one of those myself! Do you have the extra fin assembly that goes over the sheet?

Yeah i have the whole kit just testing it if it fits with the fuel cooler and i have all the dry sump lines and fuel lines running under the car also.

Nice car, good to see people going to the n'th degree on performance.

But after spending 10k on an exhaust manifold, you have off the shelf cams and a near standard head?

Surley there is more to be gained playing with real performance cams and not the average stuff the japs come up with.

Im sure you have your reasons, but if it were me I wouldve saved 9k on a manifold and spent that playing with cams/head combos.

Well actually if it were me I wouldve bought a 2nd hand JUDD V8 lol

But like I said im sure you have your reasons for doing it as you did.

Nice car, good to see people going to the n'th degree on performance.

But after spending 10k on an exhaust manifold, you have off the shelf cams and a near standard head?

Surley there is more to be gained playing with real performance cams and not the average stuff the japs come up with.

Im sure you have your reasons, but if it were me I wouldve saved 9k on a manifold and spent that playing with cams/head combos.

Well actually if it were me I wouldve bought a 2nd hand JUDD V8 lol

But like I said im sure you have your reasons for doing it as you did.

Well the head did not need much work at all, the head was ported and flow tested to achieve maximum flow all this costed alot of money and time. The cams are of the shelf as they are the correct cams for the setup. I know 10K is alot of money however,think about how much money is spent in R&D when a new car is designed.

Yes i agree V8 is the way to go !!!

Soon will have the car finished and will updated any info i have about the build nothing to hide in this build.

This was on a waveblaster with a 800cc bore with the lot billet crank forged pistons billet head nd so on. Oh this is a 93 model design so its very old. The squish was like 1.1 mm huge john remade the cup's closed it down not sure what he closed it down. The guy tunning had build so many waveblasters and tunned many of them when he went to tune this one it used smaller jets then a standard ski. As you can see now the later design 2stroke have that close squish.

This ski could only be run on avgas previously now i can run it on 98RON its one crazy ski.

Actually going down in jet sizes on any performance two stroke is not a mystery at all. I port and build alot of two stroke Yamaha engines in fact I have made my career from it . The higher the airspeed through the carb the greater the depression across the jet this means the more the fuel will flow out of the same jet. he would have gone down to about .75 of a mm at the tightest as anymore than this and the msv will be off the roof unless you are running titanium rods, thus eliminating rod stretch.

There is some interesting things happening in this thread some great craftsmanship. John truly is an artist at fabrication. Im not sure I agree with all his theories but thats the ok. It will be interesting seeing the finial result.

Actually going down in jet sizes on any performance two stroke is not a mystery at all. I port and build alot of two stroke Yamaha engines in fact I have made my career from it . The higher the airspeed through the carb the greater the depression across the jet this means the more the fuel will flow out of the same jet. he would have gone down to about .75 of a mm at the tightest as anymore than this and the msv will be off the roof unless you are running titanium rods, thus eliminating rod stretch.

There is some interesting things happening in this thread some great craftsmanship. John truly is an artist at fabrication. Im not sure I agree with all his theories but thats the ok. It will be interesting seeing the finial result.

Good to see someone who has explained the 2 stroke theory . I would love for you to see this ski its Tod hunters old ski yami waveblaster with all the goodies you can think off.

I am extremly curious on where you disagree on johns theories, best ask the question so i can ask him and get you more info about it unless i know the answer.

Yeah I know of the ski. Put a picture of the engne bay and I will be able to see what spec or at least what alot of its.

There has been some major updating in the case portings since that ski was built which add greatly to them if you decide you want a bit more.But i am assuming its an r&d cylinder with a 8mm stroke crank.

The main thing I am talking about with regard to your 34 engine is the money spent but then not looking at the v-cam. The reason is will give you a wider spread of power this is why in sports sedans if you run variable cam timing they hit you with a weight penalty. The benefit is you can run a larger cam up top and get more power but still have the lower rpm characteristics. Personally I would also be looking at the efr borg warner turbo

Yeah I know of the ski. Put a picture of the engne bay and I will be able to see what spec or at least what alot of its.

There has been some major updating in the case portings since that ski was built which add greatly to them if you decide you want a bit more.But i am assuming its an r&d cylinder with a 8mm stroke crank.

The main thing I am talking about with regard to your 34 engine is the money spent but then not looking at the v-cam. The reason is will give you a wider spread of power this is why in sports sedans if you run variable cam timing they hit you with a weight penalty. The benefit is you can run a larger cam up top and get more power but still have the lower rpm characteristics. Personally I would also be looking at the efr borg warner turbo

Below is the pic of the ski.

Since i have owned it , i have repainted it from its ugly paint work. And i have had the motor rebuilt with more usable power, used to have huge 48mm carbs now its got 38mm, not as high comp so i can run normal fuel as before i could only run it on avgas. Also has alot of other work done to it.

post-49633-0-78829800-1303616172_thumb.jpg

post-49633-0-22527700-1303616203_thumb.jpg

I have spoken to John about runnig the V-cam he said you dont need to as it is a stroker will give you power over the range and with the correct cam selection and the right squish it will be responsive down low. Also i know using a V-cam is limited on cam choice. If you think i should use a borg warner turbo ok do they supply compressor maps? If not then we cannot use it. The turbonetic turbo we have is a high pressure ratio turbo same as what they used in F1. Also can you tell me the advantages of a borg warner turbo over the one we are using. I can post a compressure map for this turbo.

-ok the pictures tell me its the orginal cylinder on that ski. it has a limited spec factory b-pipe with a twist girdle head. the twist girdle head was made by msd back in the day.

48s are a bit harder to tune but when tuned right will give you alot of torque. Its stands to reason that the 38s will require smaller jets as the engine is bigger and the air speed in the 38s is higher then the 701 engine they came off. Thats the old r&d intake manifold on there and thats why it didnt go as well as it could of with the 48s, did the 48s have a purple top on them. If so it was buckshots and should be placed in a bin hahaha. they were good in there day but that was a long time ago.

Efr borgwarner turbos are just new out (2011) and have been totally redesigned for a performance car application, i suggest you look at this. f1 cars had turbos banned in 1989 thats 22 years ago, there has been alot of development since that time.

Go here and you will see the efr turbos and there specs. I suggest you get John to have a good look at it

A stroker will have more torque I agree but if your spending 10 on an exhaust manifold I am at a loss why you wouldnt use the benefit of the v-cam as well as the stroker. you can also use a more aggressive camshaft and get more up top than you could by using the camshafts you have now. variable cam timing is about giving you the best of both worlds. You could buy a blank of hks and get your specs ground on to the cam.

yes they do. you can see it running down the side of the hull on the picture.

Its painted black. Here is a couple of my old race engines so you can see the pipes.

Sorry to the hope this doesnt offend by posting off topic pics

IMG_3274-1.jpg

Picture059.jpg

super1.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...