Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Be interesting to see how you go with the OS Giken box. A friend had a twin T67 R32 GTR with a Trust box that went bang so was replaced with the OS Giken sequential that also went bang. He was making something bonkers like 600rwkws from memory. He gave up on having that much power after the box problems with some of the thinking being that it was part shifting with all 4 wheels blazing in lower gears hurting what I think was 3rd gear. He was running a Fcon so wasnt running ignition cut which I think would make a big difference

Be interesting to see how you go with the OS Giken box. A friend had a twin T67 R32 GTR with a Trust box that went bang so was replaced with the OS Giken sequential that also went bang. He was making something bonkers like 600rwkws from memory. He gave up on having that much power after the box problems with some of the thinking being that it was part shifting with all 4 wheels blazing in lower gears hurting what I think was 3rd gear. He was running a Fcon so wasnt running ignition cut which I think would make a big difference

Thanks for the advise.

Gearbox breaking is always the case in every high powered Gtr. Ignition cut does help however im trying to go the next step is having sensors in the gearbox for ignition cut to occur when the dog gears are lined up. Motec have done it with Hollinger so ill find out more and get back to you 8)

I have heard that the Hollinger is usually paired with an R32 GTR transfer case when installed in a GTR. The later model transfer cases are somehow different, and doesn't apparently easily (possibly at all) adapt to the R33/R34 transfer cases. (The person that told me this might have not had all the facts too, as seems to be typical for most high end GTR stuff)

I would imagine that becase of this difference, and how the R32 GTR doesn't run a preload on the transfer case it would also make the AWD system slower to respond. Perhaps potentially making the car a little more prone to power over steer compared to the r33/r34's tendancy to understeer. It realyl would be interesting to know if there is a difference. Ive always prefered the R32 to drive to the R33/R34's.

Internal sensor switches that detect when the selector forks are fully in the engaged position is definatly the way to go too. By enabling an ignition cut at the start of the shift and re-enabling ignition when fully engaged you will get the fastest possible reliable shift. Potentially faster than a fixed delay too. Safe shift speeds could vary at low RPM and road speeds vs high RPM and high road speeds, not to mention lubrication viscosity, temperature etc.

If the OS88 is a no hasle direct bolt in, there is no question as to which way to go. One of these is definatly on my wish list.

The Hollinger RB26 transmission will bolt up to any of the GTR transfer cases. There is slight internal clutch differences 32,33&34 but the overall principal is the same.

We've removed hollingers from 32's and swapped them straight into 34's using the 34 transfer case.

Same deal applies with the OS88.

Bobby have you looked into the Motorsport systems strain gauges.

I know touring cars guys who have done what you are contemplating with hollingers and they reverted back to one of Anthony's shifters for shear reliability and simplicity.

I have heard that the Hollinger is usually paired with an R32 GTR transfer case when installed in a GTR. The later model transfer cases are somehow different, and doesn't apparently easily (possibly at all) adapt to the R33/R34 transfer cases. (The person that told me this might have not had all the facts too, as seems to be typical for most high end GTR stuff)

I would imagine that becase of this difference, and how the R32 GTR doesn't run a preload on the transfer case it would also make the AWD system slower to respond. Perhaps potentially making the car a little more prone to power over steer compared to the r33/r34's tendancy to understeer. It realyl would be interesting to know if there is a difference. Ive always prefered the R32 to drive to the R33/R34's.

Internal sensor switches that detect when the selector forks are fully in the engaged position is definatly the way to go too. By enabling an ignition cut at the start of the shift and re-enabling ignition when fully engaged you will get the fastest possible reliable shift. Potentially faster than a fixed delay too. Safe shift speeds could vary at low RPM and road speeds vs high RPM and high road speeds, not to mention lubrication viscosity, temperature etc.

If the OS88 is a no hasle direct bolt in, there is no question as to which way to go. One of these is definatly on my wish list.

post-22701-0-27885700-1354095498_thumb.png

The idea of ignition cut isn't to kill ignition for the entire gear change either.

You only need to cut ignition to release the load between the dogs & engagement rings so you can actually pull the box out of gear.

Physically selecting the next gear with power applied to the engine isn't an issue at all.

Knowing when the selector is fully engaged is irrelevant, you only need to know when the gear is about to be disengaged. Strain gauges do the best job as they can anticipate the upcoming gear change by the force being applied to the stick and the Rate it's being applied (fast gear change vs slow gear change requires a different cut time for the time it takes to disengage the gear)

Hollingers old school micro switch "rocker knobs" are just an on/off switch that indicates the stick is being pulled and leaves the cut time to the ecu. It's a constant cut time and doesn't take Into account how hard and quickly the change is being attempted.

The Hollinger RB26 transmission will bolt up to any of the GTR transfer cases. There is slight internal clutch differences 32,33&34 but the overall principal is the same.

We've removed hollingers from 32's and swapped them straight into 34's using the 34 transfer case.

Same deal applies with the OS88.

Bobby have you looked into the Motorsport systems strain gauges.

I know touring cars guys who have done what you are contemplating with hollingers and they reverted back to one of Anthony's shifters for shear reliability and simplicity.

Hollinger and Os88 gearbox only fits an R32 or R33 transfercase as the R34 transfer case as a different bolt pattern.

Can you send me Anthony's details and ill call Motec to find out pros and cons about the exact setup

I have heard that the Hollinger is usually paired with an R32 GTR transfer case when installed in a GTR. The later model transfer cases are somehow different, and doesn't apparently easily (possibly at all) adapt to the R33/R34 transfer cases. (The person that told me this might have not had all the facts too, as seems to be typical for most high end GTR stuff)

I would imagine that becase of this difference, and how the R32 GTR doesn't run a preload on the transfer case it would also make the AWD system slower to respond. Perhaps potentially making the car a little more prone to power over steer compared to the r33/r34's tendancy to understeer. It realyl would be interesting to know if there is a difference. Ive always prefered the R32 to drive to the R33/R34's.

Internal sensor switches that detect when the selector forks are fully in the engaged position is definatly the way to go too. By enabling an ignition cut at the start of the shift and re-enabling ignition when fully engaged you will get the fastest possible reliable shift. Potentially faster than a fixed delay too. Safe shift speeds could vary at low RPM and road speeds vs high RPM and high road speeds, not to mention lubrication viscosity, temperature etc.

If the OS88 is a no hasle direct bolt in, there is no question as to which way to go. One of these is definatly on my wish list.

Am using a R32 gtr transfer case however going to run more preload so its similar to a R34 gtr transfer case.

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Increasing overlap will bring the torque down earlier (and make your idle sound sick lol). Worth a shot (if you dyno time) to experience a bit (providing you are confident your valves won't kiss your pistons). Is to just take off 5 degrees across the boosted area of the map, and then retard the exhaust cam let's say, 3 degrees at a time and then overlay all the runs with VCT on all the way and VCT off as soon as you make positive pressure. Ideally you would have a total of 6x overlays to looks at 0 exhaust & VCT off once manifold pressure is +ve 0 exhaust & VCT on all the way -5 exhaust & VCT off once manifold pressure is +ve -5 exhaust & VCT on all the way -10 exhaust & VCT off once manifold pressure is +ve -10 exhaust & VCT on all the way Just leave your O2 wideband closed loop on for all of the boost area & RPM, and hopefully there isn't too much fuel correction needed and the Haltech is fast enough to compensate (I do this, then apply the correction to the main table). Getting that overlay data should give you a good indication of what to aim for.
    • So, my main limitation here is that the car does not have an oil pressure sensor by default, just a switch. As part of my tune I bought an oil pressure sensor upgrade so I now have access to oil pressure levels and logging rather than just the boolean behaviour of the switch but this means I need to use the tuning app to display this value. So, this rules out using any other app on the iPad. The app will also flash when pressure drops which is a nice feature. I have replaced the centre screen with an Android one, which is awesome for Android Auto, but I think it might be too far away and out of my line of sight. I might add some gauges to it this weekend and just see. I guess if its just temp and oil pressure I can make them massive! 🤣  
    • This is what the look like normally. Except we only got the 2 doors locally
    • Back pressure is not really a function of the exhaust itself, but the turbine/housing. So the question/point remains valid. I would be fitting an EMAP tapping point and seeing what is going on in the exhaust manifold before committing to throwing boost at it. Flow. No intercooler is actually rated for continuous operation at any power level wrt temperatures, as they are no actually capable of shifting the required amounts of heat on a continuous basis. They get hot during a pul, then dump some of that heat into the external air (and some back into the internal air) during off load moments/periods). You probaby do need a bigger core, given the power level you're already at is somewhat above the "rating" of the cooler. Put pressure tapping points either side of the core (which possibly you already have, if you have a boost source near the compressor outlet and tapping near the throttle for existing purposes) and report on delta P across the core.   I haven't done the mass flow calculation to see where you would be sitting on the compressor map at the ~450is rwkW level we're talking here, but if you look just at the PR you're running at, which is ~2.8-2.9, then you have a really really wide swath of the compressor map to run in, and so long as you were making between about 45-75 lb/min of flow, you should have really good comp efficiency, with the ideal being betweem 55 and 65. I can't see the need to shift drastically on the map to get better results.
    • Welcome 🙂 The ER34 wheels and slight lowering suit the R33 sedan really well. I'm firmly in the 'keep it stock, at least on the outside' camp.
×
×
  • Create New...