Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Its strange how he seems completely blown away over how awesome and impressive it is at its ability for power down, cornering, braking and being ridiculously fast. The whole second video he is astonished by what the car can do. I have never turned off my VDC but I would have thought on the track there should be a different behaviour to the car when pushed. Any other GTR owners care to comment? Have you turned off VDC? Was the car the same?

apart from above post and OP, has anyone driven a 35 GTR? As far as I can see you cant just assume it is awesome because its an evoloution of the cars you have... I'm not trying to be an A$$hole, its just the truth. I dont know how a 35 GTR feels... I like them, I think they would be great to drive, but I havent driven one so I cant sit here and say he is wrong. Yes there is a slight variation between his opinion in the two videos, but as said they are in different contexts really....

2nd video pause at 3:30

also, i havnt seen the "Thriller" dvd but from what i can see from that video, Clarkson seems to be looking for cars that are hard to drive and excite you.

Edited by alex182

top gear uk has gone to hell since it became famous and a big name in tv, anyone seen the topgear us...its muccch better and funnier too but they actually do some pretty good sh.t

Blasphemy!!

also, i havnt seen the "Thriller" dvd but from what i can see from that video, Clarkson seems to be looking for cars that are hard to drive and excite you.

Exactly. Hence why I said it is taken slightly out of context. Obviously he thinks it's a great car. However the point of the DVD was not to find what car can set the best lap time.

If anything, I think the second review is more positive than the first one. He credits the car with simply never breaking loose and just gripping to the track, every time, all the time, etc. The GT-R seems to have way more grip and brakes than outright power, so it will 'feel' boring. I suppose if some modders decided to add a couple of hundred HP it'd smash more things and be considerably more 'exciting' as it stresses the car's limits on grip.

Now if he had've said that, everyone listening would have been happy with his judgement all of the sudden :P

Crarkson is the ultimate "HOON" He has never been interested in how fast he can punt a car around a track because he cant drive for shit.

Give him something that makes lots of noise, smoke, and goes sideways at the drop of a hat and he'll fap on for hours about what a wonderful machine it is.

And good luck to him, Damn fun work if you can get it.

LOL you should really take anything clarkson says with a grain of salt, he always bags out jags, bmws and porsches, yet drives them some days he loves them, some days he hates them. Look at how many cars he says are great in his driving review gets back to the studio and says its a piece of crap.

He creates entertainment for the motoring world, and generates controversy to keep people entertained and watching, otherwise it would just be another boring motoring review show.

Crarkson is the ultimate "HOON" He has never been interested in how fast he can punt a car around a track because he cant drive for shit.

Give him something that makes lots of noise, smoke, and goes sideways at the drop of a hat and he'll fap on for hours about what a wonderful machine it is.

MMM. He loves our HSV's lol...

as someone already said above, he always seems upset that a car can be so incredible, that its actually boring to him. hes just an old english tea-drinking codger on the inside, that would rather a crusader mk II (british ww2 tank) over a ferrari enzo.

still a good show and, i record it usually every week.. better than glee.

Crarkson is the ultimate "HOON" He has never been interested in how fast he can punt a car around a track because he cant drive for shit.

I think that is a very stupid thing to say. The guy isn't a F1 driver, no. However I'd like to see a number of people on this forum try and handle the car's that he drives. I have watched pretty much every episode of Top Gear made and know damn well that he can drive.

Given how many so called experts on these forums think they are awesome drivers they couldn't hold a candle up to Clarkson.

I think that is a very stupid thing to say. The guy isn't a F1 driver, no. However I'd like to see a number of people on this forum try and handle the car's that he drives. I have watched pretty much every episode of Top Gear made and know damn well that he can drive.

Given how many so called experts on these forums think they are awesome drivers they couldn't hold a candle up to Clarkson.

Think what you like, The very reason for the stigs existence is because the 3 buffoons that entertain us on that show know they can not consistantly put down lap numbers worth spit.

Can clarkson drive, Shit no, Can he throw a car around sideways like a 17 year old at the drifts, Oath he can. So can I. Maybe you can but you have me doubting it now.

Give 90% of the guys on this forum the machinery, the environment and the time and I lay you London to a brick they can do what Clarkson does.

as for handling the cars he drives. Yes please. I'll take a crack at it!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...