Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i would think of running both, i wouldn't like to rely on just one - especially widebands

wonder what the GM (saab etc) cars do in the event of the content sensor failing... maybe just really detuned, it wouldn't actually matter

  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

What if the E85 sensor packs it in?

What if a massive comet comes from outer space and crashes into earth?

As long as you change the sensor out every 100,000k or 50k if you are paranoid, then you will be fine. You could also argue about the e85 sensor and changing it out, but at $500 a pop?, hmm.

What if the fuel pump FAILS!

DANGER TO MANIFOLD

Or you could save yourself the hassle and buy the V500 Ecu instead. It's pretty much the same price as the vipec/haltech/Autronic etc but does so much more. That's the beauty of running multi-controllers.

Then you don't need the E85 sensor, you just need a wideband o2 which are approx $125-$150

That might work with an RB but VQ25det is a different kettle.

I havent needed to adjust my map as the Caltex eflex has been nothing but consistent so far, no matter what servo I fill at. I just run a simple wideband and will trim the tune if needed using the injector size adjustment on my Emanage Ultimate.

That might work with an RB but VQ25det is a different kettle.

I havent needed to adjust my map as the Caltex eflex has been nothing but consistent so far, no matter what servo I fill at. I just run a simple wideband and will trim the tune if needed using the injector size adjustment on my Emanage Ultimate.

Why is the VQ25DET a different kettle? It's an engine.

It's good to be able to make those adjustments yourself but what about the people who don't know what they are doing? With the appropriate ECU, it does it for you

i would think of running both, i wouldn't like to rely on just one - especially widebands

wonder what the GM (saab etc) cars do in the event of the content sensor failing... maybe just really detuned, it wouldn't actually matter

Probably no worse to an oxygen sensor or air flow meter detoriating - car simply won't run at optimum performance. I don't think it's much of a safety issue. As we've discussed earlier in the thread, the varying contents of ethanol won't put the car into danger territory unless you're tuned on a knife edge...and factory cars certainly aren't. The factory fitted E85 ECUs probably monitor both AFR and E content to make sure the mix is spot on...AFR might be a backup in case of E sensor failing, or who knows, car may go into limp mode.

Ethanol sensor might be expensive, well, $500 every 50,000km (conservative estimate here) I can easily live with...and changing it over for another one would be no harder than doing your fuel filter.

wideband is more useful than ethanol sensor imo, because with wideband you can adjust the tune perfectly to suit, where as with ethanol sensor you are only guessing how much to adjust it by.

stoich for ethanol is 9:1, and gasoline is 14.7:1. Say if your using a gasoline wideband, and running ethanol, then you're going to still read 14.7

So I'm quite confused, unless I'm missing something here?

If not another solution is to run 2x types of wideband sensors, 1x ethanol, 1x gasoline.

if you have it tuned for 14.7 on petrol and throw in e85 its not gonna stay at 14.7, it'll be down to around 11:1. easiest way is to always leave the wideband set to petrol and tune to the same afr's as you would for petrol.

stoich for ethanol is 9:1, and gasoline is 14.7:1. Say if your using a gasoline wideband, and running ethanol, then you're going to still read 14.7

So I'm quite confused, unless I'm missing something here?

If not another solution is to run 2x types of wideband sensors, 1x ethanol, 1x gasoline.

I spoke to the guy at techedge about this. The sensor reads a lambda and the converts it back. On my wideband if you want to run a E85 corrected AFR then you just have to change a few settings.. Easy as... OR look at the lambda reading.

I spoke to the guy at techedge about this. The sensor reads a lambda and the converts it back. On my wideband if you want to run a E85 corrected AFR then you just have to change a few settings.. Easy as... OR look at the lambda reading.

Which TechEdge unit do you have?

I have the 2J1...

if you have it tuned for 14.7 on petrol and throw in e85 its not gonna stay at 14.7, it'll be down to around 11:1. easiest way is to always leave the wideband set to petrol and tune to the same afr's as you would for petrol.

Wouldnt it go the otherway? being that there is only 15% Gasoline so would show something like 18:1? or am i thinking about it wrong

stoich for ethanol is 9:1, and gasoline is 14.7:1. Say if your using a gasoline wideband, and running ethanol, then you're going to still read 14.7

So I'm quite confused, unless I'm missing something here?

If not another solution is to run 2x types of wideband sensors, 1x ethanol, 1x gasoline.

You are forgetting its not straight ethanol.

I leave mine on petrol afr's and get it tuned for around 12:1 at WOT that gives me a little play room still incase Caltex change their brew. (and that way I never get confused converting from lambda.)

stoich for ethanol is 9:1, and gasoline is 14.7:1. Say if your using a gasoline wideband, and running ethanol, then you're going to still read 14.7

So I'm quite confused, unless I'm missing something here?

If not another solution is to run 2x types of wideband sensors, 1x ethanol, 1x gasoline.

yeah but if you change the fuel the relative afr is going to be out, it doesn't matter what the number is, it just matters that you realise it has changed and can tune it to suit.

most sensors read lambda anyway and convert it

Exactly, there should be a Lambda table and it will trim/add fuel as required to reach the target lambda.

A failsafe solution is to use a GM flex fuel sensor 0-5v analogue input to detect the amount of Ethanol in the brew and trim/adjust the E85 map to suit and then look into having a switchable map based on less than x% ethanol for a hybrid map/petrol map.

E85 is too inconstant for my liking to be used everyday unless the servo is consistent with their brew.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...