Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 295
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

PSN was hacked not via a PS3, but a PC emulating a PS3 from what I read. PS3 hash being leaked had nothing to do with that. Sony just sucked at protocol encryption.

There's hackers who hack because they don't like the way a product functions, and there's hackers who hack to steal. Know the difference.

Besides... who uses non disposable credit card accounts with no overdraw or low limits on the internet these days? What are you 50 and technologically illiterate?

no difference...all just jerks with nothing better to do than whinge about everything not being how they want it, or willing to work for their own pay

.......same as hacking games..why??? just play it as its intended. dont like it. create your own if you think your better. i will never understand hackers

plz come back online soon...i really wanna drive my Muira again.....

Edited by boiracer

no difference...all just jerks with nothing better to do than whinge about everything not being how they want it, or willing to work for their own pay

.......same as hacking games..why??? just play it as its intended. dont like it. create your own if you think your better. i will never understand hackers

I see. so when are you gonna design and build a car that works and performs the way you want it to, instead of bolting on bits that other people develop to hack your car to perform better?

don't understand em? look at yourself and replace your car with a PS3.

the irony is hilarious.

[quote name=ClutchBurndout-:(' timestamp='1304391521' post='5791780]

how about you all go get an xbox and stfu

Yeah, but then we'll be complaining about having to pay just to play online. I don't care if it's only $12 or whatever; it's the principle. Online play should be free.

And as for PC - Sure, no argument it's the best platform, but I prefer buying a game and not having to worry whether or not it will run properly on my machine.

For the record, I'll buy an xbox.................................. when my shit turns purple and smells like rainbow sherbet.

Yeah, but then we'll be complaining about having to pay just to play online. I don't care if it's only $12 or whatever; it's the principle. Online play should be free.

And as for PC - Sure, no argument it's the best platform, but I prefer buying a game and not having to worry whether or not it will run properly on my machine.

For the record, I'll buy an xbox.................................. when my shit turns purple and smells like rainbow sherbet.

Total time spent not playing my Xbox 360 due to it being broken because of cheap karnts at Microsoft not affording 8 extra bolts 1 year, 3 months 12 days and running. (2 broken Xbox's)

Total time spent not playing my Ps3 online because of some asshole hackers 2 weeks and running

Yeah I still prefer the Ps3, at least I can still play offline. If my Ps3 breaks or PSN is down for 1 year and 3 months then I will consider the 360 the superior console.

Yeah, but then we'll be complaining about having to pay just to play online. I don't care if it's only $12 or whatever; it's the principle. Online play should be free.

And as for PC - Sure, no argument it's the best platform, but I prefer buying a game and not having to worry whether or not it will run properly on my machine.

For the record, I'll buy an xbox.................................. when my shit turns purple and smells like rainbow sherbet.

stands in line for rainbow sherbet :whistling:

I see. so when are you gonna design and build a car that works and performs the way you want it to, instead of bolting on bits that other people develop to hack your car to perform better?

don't understand em? look at yourself and replace your car with a PS3.

the irony is hilarious.

lol.....not entirely sure what you said there. but...

Im happy with my car......so building my own would be silly.

and bolt on bits arent hacks....my exhaust doesnt drive my car for me...it merely makes it slightly better at what it does well anyways. hacks remove the need to play the game....not make the machine run faster.

PS3 was made for playing games *shocking gasp* no matter where sony think they can get extra sales.. it's all just added shit to get people buying a ps3..

I've had 2 xbox's so far.. Both are sitting at home working fine.. Never had problems.. The RROD was due to overheating (most of the time) and was a simple fix.. annoying because microsoft didnt just fix the problem straight away.. my ps3 has never had problems either but i use the xbox 99% of the time.. Both consoles are good but i'm used to the xbox controller and i prefer the xbox layout..

In regards to online play..I was initially pissed about having to pay for online play but I think you get an all round better service.. And they spend more money on the online side.. And then there's the fact that the security is better due to costs.. Total time having to worry about hackers stealing my identity on xbox = 0 days.. ps3 = 2 weeks and running..

funky wins the game

The only people that think hacking is a good idea in this thread are the comp nerds that work in IT lol

Because we know there's other reasons to "hack" a system than to go LOL CHEATS IN A GAME OLOLOLOL WAREZ

*shrug*

I never had the option of Other OS, as I got a Slim, long after they closed it. Would have LOVED to have that option, and wish I still had hardware emulation for PS2 games too, as in the first gen of PS3s.I'm just a huge nerd though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...