Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yeah if you eat too much too close to working out all the blood is in your stomach heating and digesting your food... instead of in your muscles where you need it

that's why a liquid meal is sometimes preferred, they're by nature already partially digested

I have a pre-workout snack as opposed to a meal... something carby/sugary but small... no science in that, just what works for me

  • Replies 347
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yep, felt great during session this evening. Didn't eat anything after about midday, started session at 6pm. Only thing between then was protein shake in the afternoon about 4pm. Only ended up feeling a bit off because I drank too much water too quickly haha

  • 2 weeks later...

Just from the other side of the fence...

Last night I ate 3 chicken thighs and rice and bottle of water.

then went outside and did 3x3 deadlifts for new weight PB.

I wouldn't have a meal before squats, but anything else, I perform better with a gut full of food.

no I don't do cardio.

Each to their own, but it really depends on the exercises you're doing and the food you're eating IMO. I can't do bench press on a full stomach, or anything that involves abs. There is other stuff I could do without noticing it, though. Keeping in mind your body is designed to digest while standing upright, this is one of the reasons it is said bad to eat just before going to bed (not sure how much truth/research there is to that). I know I ate pasta about an hour before a workout and felt sick half way through...that's a heavy meal because I eat a lot of pasta, will take forever to digest. Other foods like bread I can eat an hour before and not even feel like I've eaten.

My 2c after week or so of trials etc is that FOR ME a pre-workout meal is the dumbest shit EVER.

I feel sick after the first couple of sets, get fatigued very early on, and overall extremely grumpy. I end up leaving halfway through the session, having put in a very shit effort. From now on I'm not consuming ANYTHING at least 4 hours leading up to training, except for a maybe protein shake at some point a couple of hours prior.

Full stomach is worse, but a completely empty stomach isn't fantastic to work out on either. Last meal 2 hours before your workout should be plenty of time to digest past the point of it interfering with your workout, otherwise your meals must be too big or your digestive system incredibly slow. You can always just have a snack like a chocolate bar or a bag of chips - I find this to be a good compromise between getting pre-workout energy and doing things on a full stomach. Again, just what works for me...everyone is different and this is all about experimenting what works for you and what doesn't.

I think I might have to experiment a little further with different foods to see if it's just specific stuff that makes me feel like a bag of shit halfway through. So far it's been steak+veggies, and cereal that have done it - and only during push days, pull and legs don't seem as much effected. I don't think chicken bothers me too much.

Though lately since I haven't been eating after 1 - 2pm (workout at 6:30ish) I've been feeling fine. Kinda run low on energy, but certainly don't feel like a big blob that wants to spew for no good reason haha

  • 2 weeks later...

Am I a bad person if I had brown rice with honey for "desert"?

lol but no seriously, should I NOT be having just under a tablespoon of honey following workout? I know that's a really stupid question, but it's more aimed at the "small amount of simple carbs" after working out for the insulin theory.

Am I a bad person if I had brown rice with honey for "desert"?

lol but no seriously, should I NOT be having just under a tablespoon of honey following workout? I know that's a really stupid question, but it's more aimed at the "small amount of simple carbs" after working out for the insulin theory.

I don't judge people based on what they eat, so no to your first question :P

Honey is more fructose than glucose, and fructose does zero for your insulin levels. If your trying to insulin spike dextrose would be better as that is sucrose only.

However post workout (assuming your doing HIIT or weight training of some kind) is the best time to consume simple carbs, so if your doing it for the taste I'd say go for it :)

I've read the *best* post-workout drink is chocolate flavored milk because its about the right mix for post-workout. Also the insulin spike is something that is debated among researchers, I believe in eating a meal post-workout but I always do a protein shake post-workout, but I also believe pre-workout is more important...

EDIT: The post-workout window is also debatable, one of my preferred researchers, metabolic effect advises its actually hours, not minutes :)

Awesome, cheers. Yeah I know it's debated enough to almost make this thread obsolete lol. Mostly did it for taste, had my steak with steamed veggies before the rice finished cooking... So I tried just some honey with it and it was great

Lots of chicken ftw!

I always make a big batch so I can have serveral meals from it especially when I do long hours at work.

What's everyone's opinion on the ready-to-eat chickens you can buy at woolies/coles? Are they drowned in oil?

I'm no guru but working off both evidence + your anecdotes...

* banana plus

* yoghurt plus

* manuka honey

...before a workout in a ratio that suits you!

Want to try?

Rationale:-

* bananas used by Benny Elias, Martina Navratilova etc weren't just taking it for carbs; but also for potassium to help muscle contractions

* yoghurt of good probiotic variety helps with quick digestion

* manuka honey isn't just glucose/fructose/mannose/sucrose/galactose but kills GI bacteria that can create a gnawing feeling in the gut

Feedback please? Guinea cops?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...