Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

And whats the difference from BHP to just normal HP.

BHP refers to an engines power with nothing else dragging it down (no mufflers/gearbox/diff/aux components etc). So in reality it is the power the engine makes before it is put into the car hooked up onto an engine dyno in a workshop.

HP is just the overall unit of measurement and can refer to anything eg. HP @ the wheels.

Lets say your car makes 330kw at all wheels whats that in BHP & HP.

330kw@wheels is around 442hp@wheels.

To convert that to BHP is more of a guessing game and gets brought up on the forums quite a lot. Most methods people say are completely wrong (percentage, fixed amount etc). The only way to truely convert it is to know the BHP of the engine, then to know the HP@wheels of that exact same engine. Work out the loss of power and use that as your "x". Then when you have more power, so in your case 442hp@wheels, add the "x" and this will be your rough lowest amount of BHP. It will naturally be a bit more than this as there will be more loss, but this can't be worked out accurately enough for the sake of these discussions. There are a lot of factors that come into play and it gets quite technical.

So just quickly as an example (I have done this one a few times in the past).

Car makes 400BHP when new.

Same car put onto a dyno makes 350HP@wheels.

Loss of 50HP.

Three years later the car has been modified with an exhaust, tune and more boost and now makes 500HP@wheels.

Add back original loss of 50HP.

The rough lowest amount of BHP is 550BHP.

However in reality it will obviously be slightly more than this as more loss has occured.

When a car is advertised brand new do they ever tell you the AWKW or is it engine KW?

Only ever BHP.

Hope that clears all that up for you.

Only ever BHP.

Hope that clears all that up for you.

Execpt sometimes those figures a kinda fudged lol.

eg the new supercharged V8 falcons, are rated at 335kws at the flywheel, but they reel off 340rwkws dead standard lol

so it would make 335kws somewhere in the rev range.

Yeah they bullshit the figures sometimes. But they are ment to be rated as BHP.

Really? They make that much at the wheels standard? Wow.

Yeah...it does make sense though, I mean the standard NA 5L makes 307kw, then they strap an Harrop HTV1900 blower on it an only make a few killerwasps more...yeah right lol

They are bloody pathetic at getting that power to the ground then !!! Obviously need some 19 x 10 on the back and 275/35/19s.

Btw each car is different. I use [(Engine Kw)-15]x 0.85 = rwkw..................

...............but then again...I'm a d!ckhead. :3some:

Edited by simpletool

They are bloody pathetic at getting that power to the ground then !!! Obviously need some 19 x 10 on the back and 275/35/19s.

Btw each car is different. I use [(Engine Kw)-15]x 0.85 = rwkw..................

...............but then again...I'm a d!ckhead. :3some:

its easier to just do HP x 0.746 (or 0.75) = KW

or the other way KW x 1.36 = HP

Execpt sometimes those figures a kinda fudged lol.

eg the new supercharged V8 falcons, are rated at 335kws at the flywheel, but they reel off 340rwkws dead standard lol

so it would make 335kws somewhere in the rev range.

Are you sure 340rwkw dead standard?? I read about one that had the boost turned up and tuned making that power.

I know they are bloody impressive but I dont think 340rwkw dead standard.

Are you sure 340rwkw dead standard?? I read about one that had the boost turned up and tuned making that power.

I know they are bloody impressive but I dont think 340rwkw dead standard.

seen a few dyno runs now...one even ran 353rwkws but is a rather happy dyno

with a tune, good exhasut and WMI they will do 400rwkws.

Cant wait for the intercooled ones, so they can throw some real boost into them

so even if we say they are all happy dynos, how many are happy by even 40kws?

edit - they run 114mph through the traps on street tyres, they weigh 1820kgs + driver

seen a few dyno runs now...one even ran 353rwkws but is a rather happy dynowith a tune, good exhasut and WMI they will do 400rwkws.Cant wait for the intercooled ones, so they can throw some real boost into them

Gearbox says no.

353rwkw so around 430kw at the engine. That's 240kw/tonne or 116 mph trap speed (minimum).

I don't think they make that power stock the gs rated 315 from factory pulls about 260rwkw then after tune without any other modifications 380rwkw. I'd say gt would be about 280rwkw at most.

Take note that once tuned the gs/gt are identical power.

exhaust, pulley, water injection

Has anyone seen what the dyno readout looks like after 2-3 runs though?<br>Massive heatsoak in the 'heat diffuser', then the PCM shuts down the maximum<div>throttle position to around 30%.....<br>One good run down the track, then an hour and a half waiting for the <br>temps to drop to normal hahaha.

</div>

Edited by TurboMick

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • neither stumble or cut really seem to be an appropriate term....hard to explain its like a rev limiter but at 4k, but it violently shakes engine and entire vehicle as the rpms will not rise over 4k, even with slow acceleration. as soon as it hits 4k, it sounds like entire spark is lost entirely. plugs were 1.1 which I used as such, but later put in new plugs gapped down to .8 changed back after issue arose when I replaced the coils, still does it with either plug gap...damn and it was all running so good.
    • Oh how times have changed! I actually lean it out relative to my water/methanol injector duty cycle. The methanol adds a lot of fueling and you can then lean it out even more due to reduced knock. 
    • Yeah my thoughts are the same, a well thought out WMI setup, would be slightly ahead of just straight E85 and you're also chemically intercooling the charged air, dropping it even further. This is why you need to add so much more fuel as soon as you spray. I remember someone taking me through their set up before (Dennis, has a R33, lives around Cabramatta - no idea if he's still around on this forum). He would target AFR 10:1 on 98, then as WMI ramped on, AFR would lean back up to 11:1. Amazingly, he did this all through his PowerFC, a relay to cut power to his EBC solenoid if there was not enough line pressure on his WMI kit. And of course, if there wasn't any boost made above gate pressure, you wouldn't be accessing the load cells with heaps of timing for WMI. One downside to that rudimentary setup, once the WMI came on, the EBC would unleash the dragon, and of course all the timing. Tyres would fry lol.
    • Shimmed or shimless, still solid, no hydraulic pump up stuff.
    • They have said food will be limited. Mainly meat pies and sausage rolls from memory. But they have a coffee van!
×
×
  • Create New...