Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Why go aftermarket turbo when the stock one will reliably handle n make 30 less kilowatts?? Ie 200 rwkw. If u wana go aftermarket then mite as well go for at least 270 rwkw and up

as 30rwkw makes a huge difference.

  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

had 460rwhp on stock engine just bolt ons but limited the revs to 7g everday driver.. right fuel, right tune, right maintenance will see it last as long as it can when it blows build it ;)

Ash this may interest you as i know your a racepace (killer workshop) fan boy.

We see quite a few cars from Racepace through nowadays and the results we see from our hub dyno are very close to the dyno dynamics dyno (generally 10 up or down) they are running... so hub versus roller is moot.

In fact only last week had a bayside blue R34 gtr with t518z's from there last week which pulled 280kw on mine and he had a dyno sheet for 290 from racepace exact same boost.

ye i know your results are pretty similar mate, its just one particular place in SA that's doing ridiculous fudge :)

ye i know your results are pretty similar mate, its just one particular place in SA that's doing ridiculous fudge :)

Using the same dyno/correction they use on the said SA dyno my car went 410kw at the hubs. On the same tank of fuel it went 360rwkw on a dyno dynamics roller!

Take from that what you want :)

Also my car has been going fairly well with the 360rwkw for about 6 months now, including a run down the drags and at the track for time attack, I wouldn't recommend this much power to everyone though haha

Edited by SimonR32

How much power can a neo motor reliably handle on 98 fuel and on e85 that gets tracked and little street driven?

Assuming it's all tuned properly ect..

The reason I'm asking is because I've heard or read somewhere here that neo have stronger rods.

Trackcars are tuned abit softer, keep ur oil cool and dont skimp on quality fluids.

Power will depend on setup. Pushing a smaller turbo out of efficiency (too high boost) is worse than running a slightly larger turbo in its efficiency range but both making the same power

About 270rwkw, as mentioned many times across the board above this is pushing the long term longevity of the motor. I do not think it is the rods yet rather the overall construction of the motor itself.

Yeah thats what I thought. Making 280rwkw on 17psi hypergear atr43g3 with .82 rear end. Turbo doesn't run hot at all. Have all supporting mods, greddy oil cooler. Always run good fluids. I use motul 300v 15w50 which gets changed regularly.

The reason for asking is because I am thinking of getting a tune done in e85. But not sure whether it is safe to go more power or not with this fuel. I'm happy to leave it at this power level and enjoy the other benefits of e85 but more power is always good. cheers.gif

I have a mate who had a 33 with 320rwkw on race fuel with stock internals (although tomei cams) as his daily. It ran reliably for 3 years or so until he sold it. It had done a few runs down the strip before he bought it, but otherwise he babied it. To be honest, if he had been hammering it on tracks etc i think it wouldnt have lasted. Needless to say, the thing was scary fast for the street

Edited by cannabiscorpse

Well definetely get the tune done on E85. Will be a lot safer - less chance of detonation and the engine will run cooler.

Just keep the tune making around the same power if you are that worried.

Yeah I'm not overly worried, just wanted to know what is safe. If I can go more power then great! If not than I won't and still enjoy the benefits. But looks like I will just keep as is power wise and not risk it. Just thought I would try and clear this up about neo motors as I wasn't to sure with e85.

ye i know your results are pretty similar mate, its just one particular place in SA that's doing ridiculous fudge :)

yeah and you're and idiot for continuing with this without knowing the full facts.. the owner of that dyno tunes with no temp probe correction. IE the dyno assumes an ambiant of a defult 100 deg C and then spits out a high reading. MY tuner hires the dyno and uses the intake probe correction, and the RIGHT mode on the dyno which puts it within witin range of a roller dyno. gibe or take 10 rwkw or so.

mine made 410 rwkw with no temp probe. and 367 rwkw with temp probe. - 10 rwkw off that and theres a round about 357 rwkw from a roller dyno.

hmm interesting feedback. may have to reconsider some things. either way 230kw is a big difference to the 200 my car is currently making. thanks for the info guys

mine made 410 rwkw with no temp probe. and 367 rwkw with temp probe. - 10 rwkw off that and theres a round about 357 rwkw from a roller dyno.

crack 300 on a mainline simon??

sorry, had to stir :P

Pushing a smaller turbo out of efficiency (too high boost) is worse than running a slightly larger turbo in its efficiency range but both making the same power

If they are both making the same power how can the smaller turbo be worse unless you mean you are loading it too much?

How you can do a proper temp correction on a turbo car is beyond me?:whistling: It's not just a linear equation concerting the amount of O2 (like for a nasp) but complex shit involving intercooler efficiency and all sorts.

I wish peeps would just quote power at the wheels - on the day - and not the jiggery pokery of corrected this and that.:thumbsup:

Fwiw we tuned my new motor last night and made better power and response on less boost

3kw more with 2psi less and a couple deg less timing aswell!

So it seems like after 3 years of 300rwkw on what seemed like a healthy motor might have been takin it's toll slowly over time

Fwiw we tuned my new motor last night and made better power and response on less boost

3kw more with 2psi less and a couple deg less timing aswell!

So it seems like after 3 years of 300rwkw on what seemed like a healthy motor might have been takin it's toll slowly over time

Was everything else the same (eg: compression ratio) and same dyno?

I would expect that a tight new motor would make a bit more power than a high km stocker :)

Keen to see your new graph, always been impressed with your set up!

Sam tuner, dyno etc etc

the motor is a "young" stagea 25 that was attached to an auto all it's life vs a very old skyline 25

Will post when I get to my computer

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...