Jump to content
SAU Community

  

93 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Just thought I'd throw up a poll to see how everyone shifts whether it be during everyday cruising or on the track. I personally just use my ears and if I'm really going for it then ears + as soon as I JUST feel it stop pulling as hard is when I shift, that's generally anyway not always. What do you think the best sense is or whether technology/equipment is far better?

Edited by Borci88
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/366803-how-do-you-sense-your-shift-points/
Share on other sites

everyday driving, it's usually around 2500 to 3000rpm, but it's more just done instinctively as what provides enough acceleration while still keeping both the rpm and the throttle percentage low to get good fuel economy.

in performance mode though, i use the redline as my guide. the car pulls hard to redline so there's no point changing earlier. if you go buy the "it's feeling like it's not pulling as hard" theory then you also need to pay close attention to whether it pulls as hard once you change gears, because sometimes even though the acceleration rate is slowing down, the acceleration is still faster than in the next gear.

a mix of sound, timing and the feel of the car. It's not 100% though. Hit limiter jumping on a hwy the other day.

SRs tend to drop off a bit before redline so i tend to change a bit earlier, if going hard.

general traffic 3500. then it varies depending on hills, slow cars, and how fast you wanna get around that slow car.

on the track. redline, the gearing i find is beautifully set in these cars, snapping the next gear at redline seems to pull the hardest into the next one and so on. (standard R33)

i find it doesnt really stop pulling before redline, if so only ever so slightly. But those few extra revs will get you higher into the peak rev range for the next gear.

Too many factors... In my Pootrol, I change up at about 1500-4000, depending on how much noise I want to make, (speed is not a factor, cause it is leaisurely no matter what revs..) In the GTR, between 2000-8000, depending on a lot of factors

I plot the torque curve, then calculate the tractive effort at 50RPM increments in each gear throughout the entire rev range. I then calculate the section of the curve that gives the biggest area under the curve for each gear change, which gives me the shift point for each gear. Then I program my shift light for the optimum gear change point for each gear

Not really. Actually the rev limiter does a pretty good job of telling me when to change :thumbsup:

In the Rex somewhere around 6500. In the Hoonda, it's about 8500 (cutout at 8700) and in the Pathfinder about 2500-3000

Daily driving its the seat of the pants. It will depend on road gradient, the speed limit, traffic speed, etc.

On the track, in the lower gears I'll do it by feel/sound. In the higher gears I'll watch the tacho when I can hear the engine getting close to the cutout.

general traffic 3500. then it varies depending on hills, slow cars, and how fast you wanna get around that slow car.

on the track. redline, the gearing i find is beautifully set in these cars, snapping the next gear at redline seems to pull the hardest into the next one and so on. (standard R33)

i find it doesnt really stop pulling before redline, if so only ever so slightly. But those few extra revs will get you higher into the peak rev range for the next gear.

thought about this on the next drive after posting....traffic sucks....no one does the speed limit...usually around 2000 as granny driving seems to be the only way most people drive these days ...:glare:

but in general keeping the boost gauge on the vacuum side of things makes for better fuel economy. so i make that work as best possible.

I tell usually by sound at lower gears and tacho at higher gears, and in practice (on the street) I always short shift before 5000rpm. I probably exceed 5000rpm about once per week at most (daily driving). Can't remember the last time I went past 6000rpm, on the street it just isn't required (theoretically it would be required for a drag race).

On the street in 1st and 2nd gear with any sort of corner I short shift to get into the next gear so I can ride the torque wave through and out of the corner. This means precise throttle modulation is less of a factor and it saves a gear change and means less wear(2nd has more power but can't usually put it all to the ground). Adding bumps into the equation in Sydney just makes it even more relevant.

Just cruising I change at the point the revs start at 2000rpm -2200rpm in the next gear....or what feels right.

Edited by simpletool

Only ever play close attention to the tacho when on WOT

This

Cruising around I just change gears. Not by noise, not exactly by feel... I just throw it to the next cog. Apparently I'm known to shift below 2000 rpm like this, especially in my Subie :laugh:

shift for best economy most of the time , 2500rpm so it sounds like booooar boooarrr :huh:

after a while this can become boring and opportunities arise for some booarrrr rrr ashhhhhhhhhh du dudududu, and repeat lol :no::yes:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...