Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Also this might be wrong but I see a lot more blown up rb26s than I do rb25s, could this be due to the higher rpm limit?

this is more to do with the RB26 usually being strapped into a GTR that has 4wd and can generate more sideways g forces than a similarly specked RWD car...

car is running high revs on track, and oil is all up in the head with the sump running low.... 4wd GTR comes out of a corner HARD @ 8000 revs and the slight amount of oil remaining in the sump is thrown to the side and misses the pickup. car gets no oil @ 8000 rpm = bang

RWD car does same thing but doesn't grip as hard an oil does not get thrown as hard and does not miss the pickup, hence RB25 stays alive

So how do the AWD block RB25s neo and non neo differ from the RB26? Many of the Stagea blocks I've seen have interchangeable sump and sump parts with the Rb26.

stag motor is a 25 head on a 26 block/sump setup with all 25 internals....

i just put one into my 33 gtst

Never seen a high powered 25 neo out of Japland.........just sayin

and?

theres plenty here in aust.

Mercury motorsports 700 rwhp stock bottom end neo in VC commo for one thing. however unsure how hard it gets driven.

then theres mine... pushing far more power then stock and gets driven hard at as many track days as possible.

  • 3 weeks later...

bump for this tid bit

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/251820-got-over-400kw-atw/page__st__1000__p__5902568#entry5902568

None, all the technology in the RB26 head is present in the Neo head. Valve/port angle etc. The only benefit the 26 head has is more readily available parts

i have owned 2 R33's, one with S1 engine and the other a S2 engine. when i hit 5500RPM(ish) i get a big kick onwards in torque. i have also driven a NEO RB25DET several times, it feels completely different to drive(obviously because of the constantly variable VCT as opposed to on/off VCT) and has no kick whatsoever. just a much smoother rev range all the way through. can also verify another mate feels the same way about his 34 and notices the difference when he drives his mates sil80 with a 33 RB25DET installed. is this kick coming from vct coming on or off?

also iirc:NEO uses GTR connecting rods to compensate for the smaller combustion chamber.

the neo is a smoother engine to drive. you can thank ECU tuning, the intake runner differences and the turbo differences for that.

fair enough. do not like. i prefer driving a 33 over a 34.

i have owned 2 R33's, one with S1 engine and the other a S2 engine. when i hit 5500RPM(ish) i get a big kick onwards in torque. i have also driven a NEO RB25DET several times, it feels completely different to drive(obviously because of the constantly variable VCT as opposed to on/off VCT) and has no kick whatsoever. just a much smoother rev range all the way through. can also verify another mate feels the same way about his 34 and notices the difference when he drives his mates sil80 with a 33 RB25DET installed. is this kick coming from vct coming on or off?

also iirc:NEO uses GTR connecting rods to compensate for the smaller combustion chamber.

the kick at 5500 is just the standard map in the ecu, at any airflow higher than stock its rich and retarded everywhere on boost but especially around the midrange, sometimes the changes in individual cells are so big its like flicking a switch as you described.

vct is on/off as said. neo just has it activated over a slightly different rev range from memory.

neo does use gtr rods but its nothing to do with the chamber size, they're the same length as 33 rb25 rods. the smaller chamber is allowed for in the pistons.

Edited by JonnoHR31

I wish someone would prove conclusively that Neo chambers were smaller because I've never seen anything to show it .

I know that on some later/last versions of some engines manufacturers went to long reach spark plugs so they could improve cooling galleries around the chambers , do Neos use different style plugs to R33 RB25DETs ?

Anyway I gather Neos use the same sized valves and if pistons are same/similar the static CR must rise if the chamber volumes are less .

What truly gives ?

A .

im pretty sure neo's use same plugs. i use BCPR6ES's in mine anyway.

im with you.. not all that convinced that the chamber is smaller... maybe a slightly different size

As far as I knew it was only the lean-burn RB20's that were marginally smaller (also a redesigned shape)

I wish someone would prove conclusively that Neo chambers were smaller because I've never seen anything to show it .

I know that on some later/last versions of some engines manufacturers went to long reach spark plugs so they could improve cooling galleries around the chambers , do Neos use different style plugs to R33 RB25DETs ?

Anyway I gather Neos use the same sized valves and if pistons are same/similar the static CR must rise if the chamber volumes are less .

What truly gives ?

A .

The pistons are different so this should account for the same static comp but different chamber volumes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...