Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all, trying to install my new injectors, and fuel rail, never done it before but having a crack none the less,

its just not looking right, they are Xspurt 1000s and some knock off rail, (not what i asked for but what i got). and i also got speed flow port adaptors,

so they way i have tried it is

rail > speedflow adaptor > injector > and then stock O ring into the manifold,

here are some pics,

IMG_0519.jpg

IMG_0520.jpg

IMG_0521.jpg

its in this last picture that im a bit worried, just doesnt seem right,

any help is welcome,

thanks

dan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/367837-diy-injector-install/
Share on other sites

Measure how far you want the injector to drop, then cut the same amount off the spacer. I guess you need the injector to be sitting right down or the blue spacers may pop off right?

Good choice on the Xspurts. I have the 1000's now, running eflex and it idles perfectly.

yeh if i lower the injector the i wont have a good fit in the spacer, ill try sort it out tomorrow,

glad to hear some good feed back on them, i was told they are very similar to the ID's when i baught them, although, i wish it was a straight forward

looks like you got 2 o rings there

yeh pal, there is, but ones on the injector it self and on is in the manifold, but i firstly thought that i would take the one out of the manifold, nbit the injector then would move around,

as it sits now, its firmly in place, but i no it not right,

yeh pal, there is, but ones on the injector it self and on is in the manifold, but i firstly thought that i would take the one out of the manifold, nbit the injector then would move around,

as it sits now, its firmly in place, but i no it not right,

It looks like you need to take off the original o ring that sits in the plenum and cut / grind off piece of the spacer where the allen bolt passes thru so the entire rail will now move down and hold the inj firmly in place using only the o ring on the inj

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, sort of blurring two different things together, aren't we? I just meant O2 feedback closed loop. I used to have a 0-1V LCD meter on my dash, wired directly to the O2 sensor signal. So you could easily see what it was doing. Normal running it would flick back and forth nicely. Slow down to an idle and it would keep flicking, as the ECU tried to servo to maintain stoich, but it would slow down as each swing happened until it would stay at one end of the scale. As I said above, the sensor heater is not enough to keep it hot enough when there is also little heat in the exhaust flow. Give it a blip and it would start swinging again, then peter out again. Meanwhile, idle speed control would run just fine, because unrelated.
    • It's not even O2 feedback, it's just simply when the ECU sees the closed TPS signal for whatever reason the idle will start steadily dropping until the engine dies. With the TPS adjusted to not trigger closed TPS it will idle at some ridiculously high RPM and something like 6 degrees of timing. In the absence of getting eyes on it personally and a lot of quality time doing diagnostics I couldn't tell you what the real problem was but it was interesting nonetheless
    • Oof. One of my mates has an R34 GT-R that he initially was a "I want to go twins for response and convenience" on his stock 2.6 with Kelford 272 cams, but his friends are pests and were always in his ear about their place being in the bin.   Eventually one of the 2860-5s decided to add it's own input and force his hand, so he conceded and went for a Pulsar 6262G ("G35 900") with T4 0.85 hotside.    Here's an overlay of the results, same cams, same stock bottom end, same boost, same fuel, just from a pretty tidy 2860-5 install to a Pulsar turbo on a 6boost maniifold on BP98.   Worth mentioning here, it may seem like a dead horse thing but the dyno plot doesn't tell the story of how much better it is to drive - transient response has completely changed the car, he used to have flat foot shifting to stop it having to wind up again on gear changes even at >7000rpm... now it builds boost faster than that even short shifting.   It's 100% transformed the car before you even consider how much better it holds on: Pulsar and Garrett aren't the same, but from our experience if you're just looking for a better drive and the ability to make the same or more power I think the divided G30 770 would probably be the smallest I'd go to.
    • Great work Duncan, any events local you will give it a test once all done? 
×
×
  • Create New...