Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys looking for some opinions to help me make a decishion i have loved skylines for year and at the end of this year i will finally be able to get my first skyline but only an N/a due to restrictions on licencing do i start off with an na and build my way up doing suspenshion mods and minor perfomance or wait and get a factory turbo

TLDR p plate na modify and convert will i be disapoint with result?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/369474-na-to-turbo-heart-break-or-hero/
Share on other sites

NA skylines defs not worth it, i have one and kinda regret it, always wanting more power out of it wish i could have a turbo and run boost and keep increasing boost! i recommend if it's not urgent, get a R32 GTR or a R34 GTT and mod it up in your garage, strip it again and again understand it more, then once u hit your fulls just drive it everywhere knowing the car u know and understand inside and outside!

hey mate years ago i bought a n/a from a deakership, but after purchusing i was informed that the n/a block wouldnt support a turbo even though they are same block....not sure if its a myth maybe u should think about doin what grey said or buy the n/a and buying gtst front cut to installl in it later

Have a chat to Aggroman (Dave). He took his NA 34 and when he got off his P's he did a turbo conversion with great results. Mind you, he's an absolute wiz with a wrench but worth have'n a chat to him.

due to the different compression between the turb and na engine to turbo it you would have to change the pistons to turbo ones. Ive read that you can use the n/a pistons but you can only boost it to the bare min.

I am in this situation too. i am throwing up doing a rb25det swap into my 32, a rb20det swap or just selling the car and buying a turbo after i get off my P's.

I am leaning towards selling it as its alot of work to get the N/a up to the same level as a stock standard turbo.

if i were you i would hold off and just buy a turbo, when they say N/a skylines are slow THEY MEAN IT !! haha

Half the na section is on this topic, and of the hundreds of people on here who have done the na+t conversion I have only read of very few who haven't regretted it after a few years. IF you're going to do all the work yourself it won't be too dramatically expensive, but it's still wasted money and effort compared to buying a factory turbo skyline. And it's no small job, the easiest option is to put an rb25det in the car and that involves changing the ecu (and wiring loom i believe?).

Also STRONGLY recommend a defensive drivers course if you're going to be driving a rwd with no traction control. There's really no downside to learning more techniques about safe driving, and you may have seen that there's plenty of accident damage on sau. It might seem like a waste of time to some people, but sometimes a split second is all you have in an emergency and if you don't react properly you could be wishing you'd taken that driving course while getting your car towed away... Or maybe just hoping you'll be able to walk again one day.

I didnt bother reading it all and CBF writing a massive essay so ill break it down

It can be done, its not hard at all

manifolds bolt up fine, dont need to change pistions thats crap.. Plenty of cars run 10:1 Comp

GTT aftermarket ECU's work, I run A PFC in mine. (secret quirrel trick to get rid of engine check light as GT's dont have traction control, dont know what that is? google it. Its what the stagea ppl do as they have hte same problem any good workshop cna do it). You can also run standard ECU with a piggyback to handle fuel etc like a Greddy Emanage Ultimate with the Ignition Harness thats sold seperately (required for r34 only)

The only parts that you cant get off the shelf are turbo water/oil lines they need to be custom (easy as) everything else matches up fine. except for a plazmaman plenum you will need GTT runners

So long as you have enough exhaust flow boost isnt an issue, Im pushing 250KW atm with standard motor, highflow turbo (at 14psi) and supporting mods and will be up to 300-350 with a turbo change.

Budget 4-5K if you are going to give it to a workshop to install and tune. Parts will set you back roughly 3.5K depending on computer choice.

The 25DE Neo motors are tough as nails so dont worry about throwing a rod unless you service your car poorly..

Wanna see how one goes? Come to the Texi in September and watch me..Or just look at my sig below :P

Do it.

Check out these two threads, might help you decide:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/33407-how-to-turbo-your-na/

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/249186-nat-power-results-na-t-turbo-conversions-only/

I've done the same thing, and am very happy with the results.

Started out with a stock car, did all the suspension work, put in a good stereo which is a bit more of a hobby than anything, and heaps of other little bits and bobs along the way. Started prepping the car for the turbo conversion, decent wide tyres, adjustable bushes for good alignment, coils and plugs, changed all the filters etc. At that stage, it was a good fun car to drive, handled well and a good daily, just low power and a crap sound...

Did the conversion, ended up costing me around the $2k mark parts alone as i did all the work myself, apart from the $600 of that being custom intercooler piping to avoid cutting the engine bay at all.

Just got the exhaust done, fitted a boost controller (currently set to nothing until I can get the car on a dyno. Currently, the car's even/above par with a mates GTST on 10psi in terms of acceleration, having the turbo spool at 1500rpm, and now 5psi at 2200rpm is very street able.

You'll get alot of negative feed-back against this path, yet the only real downside is the 4 stud brakes/wheels, and the gearbox (depending on the car) that will hold you back. Realistically, not alot of GTST's have standard anything anymore, so why not do the basics while on your P's, and the power package later on?

No, it's not legal to convert it/drive it without an engineers certificate, yet neither is a GTST with a boost controller, FMIC, loud exhaust etc. etc.

WYTSKY DID hit the 295aw/kw mark, then de-tuned for safety, as Aggroman said, 250kw on 14psi, it's not like the engine is limited to any less that a low compression motor, PROVIDED you don't try to make 400hp out of $50, which applies for any performance car...

I think i'll shut up now... :whistling:

Biggest thing about turbo motors and high compression is to keep the boost at a reasonable level. Low compression on turbo motors is to ensure there is no detonation.

As others have said high compression turbo motors will be more responsive up to a reasonable boost level and then detonation risk will prevent you from making more power.

So good fuel and good tune will keep you sorted.

Biggest thing about turbo motors and high compression is to keep the boost at a reasonable level. Low compression on turbo motors is to ensure there is no detonation.

As others have said high compression turbo motors will be more responsive up to a reasonable boost level and then detonation risk will prevent you from making more power.

So good fuel and good tune will keep you sorted.

+1

Realistically, it's not that much more expensive to get good DET power out of a DE+T, yet with more response and the power moved a bit to the left.

There are options to oppose detonation at higher boost levels. E85, decent inter-cooler, water-meth injection, but reliability, long-term effectiveness and cost are the factors.

mine lasted 1 year lol

crack the ringlands on piston #6, ran 1bar of boost.

but liek others have said, aggroman & wytsky have been running decent power on theirs with no issues.

1 bar is a fair bit through 10:1 compression, and a year isn't bad on an un-opened motor, but I bet you didn't regret a moment when it did go?

WYTSKY is running ~19psi from memory?

which make/model do you think of when i say UTE?

SS ute? xr ute? hilux?

so why not use the same principal when choosing a n/a car?

for me its honda integra/civic type r/s2000. not a skyline.

your re-sale will be much much better. when you're ready for a turbo car then go for a skyline. its not worth the $ converting if you cant do it yourself (brakes/rotors, ecu/tune, injectors/pump etc etc). its definitely not a case of just fitting a turbo and off you go.

thanks for all the replies guys it has given me alot of fuel for thought im hoping for an r34 thats the dream i can do the work myself borrow people garages :) as i dont have my own. really want a skyline love them to bits but i really dont want to be disapoint with the na and i do understand the amount of work ide be getting my self into goal, is about 220 as a daily, conservative i know but i dont wana break my babby .can i have recomendations for an na car ? thinkin about getin a mr2 ?? as theres one going cheapish in my area " lookin to get into the drift scene :)" as for commin to the texi i would love to sexy skylines every where sounds like a day in heaven

btw agroman that would be sick i love 34s yours looks mint man absouletly mint can i please have a ride shot gun ??? please???

dude if u wanna drift DONT buy a mr2. Na s13 would be the go + u can always turbo the s13 later. my self i wouldnt bother with a na platform, unless u willing to spend sum cash, ie, they all get smaller brakes, smaller gearboxs, shit diffs etc.

NA MR2s are slower than a wet week, and any mid-engined car is a pain in the backside to maintain. They look cool, though.

Nothing wrong with a DE+T as long as you're not chasing big power/boost. NA internals won't ultimately be able to handle the same cylinder pressures as FI ones (even taking the compression ratio out of the equation) but, as above, you'll still be making a fair amount of power before that becomes an issue. At the same time the lower weight internals and higher compression is going to improve efficiency and response.

Personally I'm all for a DE+T on a street car. On the street big power isn't usable that often, but being more fuel efficient and more responsive is something you can appreciate every day. If you're going to sink big bucks into it down the line to chase big power, even a stock DET is going to need to be cracked and brakes are going to require upgrades, so starting from a NA position becomes irrelevant.

As people have said, it is a good path to work through. Start NA and work on supporting mods (handling, driveline) so you can get used to the car and how to drive it, as well as prepping it for a big power increase, and do that last.

I had a MR2 that was built the other way (stock open diff, rubbish D2 coilovers, stock brakes, but big power) and the thing was exhilarating when you punched the throttle, but scary (in a bad way) when you tried to stop or turn. It's not something I care to repeat.

  • 1 month later...

what about an actual engine transplant my na r34 already has the gt-t brakes so all i would need is the drivetrain of a GT-T (when my one snaps lol ) i can get an NEO rb25det (including ecu, loom) for around $2000-2500 bucks im just wondering what else needs to be done?

i know buying a GT-T is a better option but i would like to work on an engine and learn how it works before i put it in my car (itll be out for around 2.5 years so hopefully i can mod it whislt its out of the car) then when im on my fulls bang it in.

Cheers,

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...