Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

haha I'll change it up a little bit for low carb rest days by swapping out the brown rice for a slice of grainy bread and changing my oats n fruit desert for peanut butter on some low-carb bullshit....but there's never gonna be white bread or anything more than 2-4 slices of grainy bread in my diet sorry Birdman :P

I admire your dedication diet wise. .

I had a medium rare steak for lunch, pepper sauce, chips, vegies, potatoes with garlic sauce, and a glass of American Honey, neat.

0 f**ks given :D

To be fair, that's only a Friday thing...

I admire your dedication diet wise. .

I had a medium rare steak for lunch, pepper sauce, chips, vegies, potatoes with garlic sauce, and a glass of American Honey, neat.

0 f**ks given :D

To be fair, that's only a Friday thing...

Trust me, over the last 2 months the only dedication I've had is to eat everything I've missed out on in the past 6 months - and in ludicrous quantities (hence the 6kg weight gain LOL).

Last night I had a huge schnitzel with chips and salad. Smashed the whole thing (no, that's no a feat - it's showing I ate potato hahaha) and then proceeded to go home and eat a total of 11 weet bix with ~600ml full cream milk, topped with probably about 60g of prunes, small handful of sultanas, 1 scoop BN vanilla WPI, and some sugar free maple syrup. Oh, and some ANZAC biscuits.

I admire your dedication diet wise. .

I had a medium rare steak for lunch, pepper sauce, chips, vegies, potatoes with garlic sauce, and a glass of American Honey, neat.

0 f**ks given :D

To be fair, that's only a Friday thing...

so you probably had around 100g protein, 40g fat and 100g carbs..... Not even half of troys requirements to meet his data. Edited by jangles

I eat pretty well but no set plan, jut smart choices but I've gotten past the ecto stage partly from gym and partly due to slow metabolism due to age.

Back when I was 65kg it was very different.

Keep up the good work Troz!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...