Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hahahaha 95kph on an exercise bike...that's f**ked :P

Yeah I've had my fair share of experience with cheap parts on things breaking when they shouldn't, kinda why I have a habit of buying the model of something slightly above my requirements or just spending that little bit extra to get the next model up coz it comes with upgraded parts (example with this new bike is the gearsets are much better than the next one down, worth the extra kesh imo).

The Norco was an amazing bike and so much fun to ride, WHEN I rode it....which was practically never, especially for what it was designed to do. In the last few years I owned it, it barely even saw dirt let alone jumps....LET ALONE A REAL DOWNHILL TRAIL haha

Yeah I have that frame of mind for most things now, buy a touch better than you think you'll need.

The exercise bike stunt was hilarious, lying on the floor, half drunk laughing my guts out and while my pate pissed themselves laughing at a dickhead who crashed an exercise bike, good times.

I don't ride much anymore. Use to just hammer the old dunlop hard tail around for fitness.

Yeah that's why I got the Giant, get my fitness up in a bit more of an enjoyable way. Shame there's no way of remotely accurately measuring calorie expenditure on it....I mean even stationary cardio equipment DESIGNED for that purpose isn't accurate haha

Yeah....ah well, I'll just aim for a certain distance each week. The lake nearby work is pretty well spot on 7km around via the cycle path, so I'll set a goal of 50km/week and see how it goes.

Get ready to start eating.

Main point of my desire to increase the amount of exercise I'm doing (not specifically lifting) is to create a caloric deficit without eating less, so this is a good thing ;) won't necessarily increase the amount I'm eating for a little bit, but I definitely don't need to lower again it to keep body fat down :)

Depends on what you're comparing it to lol....lately it's gone to shit BIG TIME thanks to stress induced depression. f**king hormones lol. Thankfully my increase in cardio is helping a lot with my general mood, but it's working against my lifts (well, they aren't getting better yet lol). Haven't had much appetite, but when I do it's EXCLUSIVELY for average quality foods :( that's getting better with mood change, but gotta get it back to regular meals through the day. This will help me to eat more for lifting energy, without having to worry about any kind of notable fat gains :)

I wish it wasn't so :( but dead serious, this is the first time I've dealt with actual depression (hating life for no logical reason, as opposed to my usual grumpiness :P) and goddamn it sucks haha

At least I can keep a relatively logic frame of mind no matter how shit I might feel. Unfortunately this only really stops it from getting worse or really affecting me; doesn't do much to help it go away when there's no cause that I'm aware of.

Meh, squats are still increasing and that's the only lift that really matters....right?

So I rode around the lake on my lunch break (accidentally took a shortcut so it was only 5.8km)....and all I have to say is I'm sold. Consider me a convert....not enough to go full licrafag just yet though :P

This will become a daily thing for sure. Feel great having done a half decent "cardio" sesh outside in the fresh air and NOT on my old bike or something equally exhausting and unexciting.

deadlifting is great too, its the most calories you can burn in one movement, you dont have to be strong to do it however you can really increase the weight and you feel it very fast but even with beginner weight our body burns heaps.

i dont realise how much its working (due to low fatigue unlike high rep stuff) untill i get dissy then i realise how much im working.

also i got some advise the other day which hepled a supprising amount (for squats)

dont try to lift the bar try to push the ground away from you.

sounds dumb but it stops the back lifting and moves eveything down to your legs.

really try to push the ground away from you mentally.

deadlifting is great too, its the most calories you can burn in one movement, you dont have to be strong to do it however you can really increase the weight and you feel it very fast but even with beginner weight our body burns heaps.

i dont realise how much its working (due to low fatigue unlike high rep stuff) untill i get dissy then i realise how much im working.

also i got some advise the other day which hepled a supprising amount (for squats)

dont try to lift the bar try to push the ground away from you.

sounds dumb but it stops the back lifting and moves eveything down to your legs.

really try to push the ground away from you mentally.

I actually figured squats would burn more cals haha, but yeah it's a different kind of calorie expenditure. Can't rep out squats for 30 mins straight :P (for the record, I'm a very firm believer in what you've said and agree entirely - dropped 4.5kg in 6 weeks with ZERO cardio, just modified diet and kept trying to increase my squats and deads haha)

Regarding the whole "push the ground away" thing, I've used it (or tried to) for deadlifts and unfortunately it just doesn't bloody happen haha. No matter what I do or think when I go through the movement, it ALWAYS ends up feeling the same (lifted the bar). But yeah, I understand that part too - guess I just need to work on the mental side of it a bit more haha

I should clarify push the ground only works for me with squats not DL.

DL is still very much a pull for me.

Yeah same here. There's still way too much obvious pulling movement going on and not enough use of legs overall to mentally label it as "pushing the ground away" in my mind.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...