Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Moshen was that you on the TV this morning explaining how the load shifted on your truck and you managed to bring down the bridge pile on??!!?

Anyway, events for next year.

Needs peoples onions, crap or even crapper?

http://www.skylinesa...scavenger-hunt/

http://www.skylinesa...5601-mt-buller/

http://www.skylinesa...85602-gor-2012/

You providing onions at every cruises/events?

Yeh that's because your right hand can't speak

-_-

homygohd bro, i turned the car on and it made this noise, thought the engine was broken, then I realised it was my sick subwoofa.

Twas a little more than a noise.

Tasty

Would you get one though? Must admit they are good value. Guess that's why there are so many of em on the road...

I also like the hsv coupe but dunno something about owning a holden always puts me off buying

F6s are quicker for same money :P guess it depends if you want the 8 and if you do want a 8 you'd be silly to pass up the new 5.0 SC ford so much better than holden atm (last 10 years hasnt been though)

Where's that?

Intunemotorsport?

Daycareandcar160.jpg

Haha yeh I'll be down the hwy running it in.. up and down, no drags just yet. Especially after kris got done last week :\

And yeh i'll let you guys know how the fpv compares to the GTR once I've been driving it over teh weekend

New 5.0 is a modular engine to there's plenty of room for future upgrades i.e. direction injection and many other electronic gizmos.

Good to see Ford returning back to its former v8 glory days with a new direction :worship:

Yeh 4x VCT ftw, lets not forget the engines only 1 year old.. wait until development of more aftermarket parts. And they are already raping anything HSV has to offer. I was not bias at all going into the decision would of been FPV or HSV but after doing my research.. ZF + 5.0 = win.

Other car I was looking at was the 335i, but didn't like what you got for what you pay.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...