Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You'd die after one momo.

clam down.

I've just come off 2 weeks of that, over 40hrs OT logged for the past 9 days. I'm gonna be getting a nice pay packet next week. And then 2nd Jan gear up again for more punishment...

Are you challenging me Good sir?

Yeh birds tell em take cash n Fk off though need something in writing or they could try ream u twice

Yep I'll have it written and signed, wouldn't let em do that to me haha. Just gonna have a word to the daughter and tell her, look, you're a P plater and you're gonna scratch the shit out of this car one way or another...better off just taking the money rather than getting your bumper re-done only to hit a parking pole or Grant's car at Doncaster shoppo.

Yep I'll have it written and signed, wouldn't let em do that to me haha. Just gonna have a word to the daughter and tell her, look, you're a P plater and you're gonna scratch the shit out of this car one way or another...better off just taking the money rather than getting your bumper re-done only to hit a parking pole or Grant's car at Doncaster shoppo.

I chuckled.

What sort of cars does the panel beaters deal with that thinks these quotes 'sounds about right'?

Everything and anything cars. I've used one of them before and they were pretty reasonable on costs, so happy to take their word for it.

The times they are a changing.

How's the car Leigh? How's it on fuel?

Guy across from my work just for brand new gt but it must be te update model has the new headlights looks good black with gold stripes, wheels r ugly as though

Yeah going good loving it, I think the fuel on the brand new engine starts out bad (was like 25l/100) but since then going down and now its at like 15-16l

Most people on the forums are getting like 11-15L per 100 depending on their foot I guess.

It goes well thats for sure :D

haha yeh i bet you'll shave another 3-5ltr off that when your foot calms down haha

In reality its no worst than the GTR on fuel, hell I use to put 50 bucks in the GTR and I'd probably only get 200k's

Put foot down at like 30KM/h once and it actually kicked out a bit forgot I was in a RWD again :D

Needs tint badly to set it off! booked in my first service for next wednesday - from what I read its always good to get the oil out very soon due to excess metal and shiz in the manufacturing process and shit like that when its first worn in. And then off on a road trip in the new year :D

So when you picking yours up?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...