Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I Sold my 1998 r33 GTR for 19.5 i think it was

had a few mods too.. and it took a while to sell so just keep looking.

179412_491002038778_548178778_6221157_133905_n.jpg

It had a little bit of surface rust at some spots though

ahh how long ago was that man?!

i havent been around for a while :(

I would of prob checked it out!

im looking to buy one asap due to ill be using it as a daily for a few months >_<

My only thing with the R35 is that would you have fun driving a R35 compared to say a GTR if it's for the street only. For the track the R35 will be no doubt quicker out of the box.

You could say the R35 is too quick for the street.

But hey at the rate that the R34 GTR is holding its price and R35 is dropping in value in a few years R35 might be hard to say no to

ahh how long ago was that man?!

i havent been around for a while :(

I would of prob checked it out!

im looking to buy one asap due to ill be using it as a daily for a few months >_<

was in october last year

not really to me

Was next to one at the lights on Sydney Rd. and I'm pretty sure it sounded just like my 33 with the exhaust on whilst it was idling.. taking off however had a lighter tone to it. Changed three gears by the time mine shifted to second despite the driver just cruising it

Exactly.

Just the troll, trollin'

What exactly is trolling with that post?

Expressing ones opinion on a small experience is now considered trollin?

You seriously need to cut this holier-than-thou moral smugness attitude of yours and urgently get your self in check.

It's uncalled for.

Edited by Flynnn

My requirements for this bike are:

1. Cannot being converted into a track bike, aka not full faired

2. Pops many wheelies, hence 1098 cc and S edition :3

The only Harley I would ever ride/buy is this one:

IMG_0670-2.jpg

'Hey! Fatboy!' (In Lucy Liu Payback voice)

Unfortunately I think mono's could only be done with great difficulty, and it does kind of cost $65k >_<

Just booked in a test ride on this for Friday:

2009-StreetfighterS-001.jpg

A little bit excited, they have a demo for sale in my size and colour :thumbsup: I hope it rides like I want it to!

Ohhh look at that, matching colours...we should go for a ride if you get one :whistling:

ih5x6w.jpg

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...