Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So when most 250cc bikes come with a 130 at their widest? Significant difference between that and a 190...

For a tyre to maintain traction it needs to run at a certain temperature, too cold = lack of traction, too hot = increased rate of break down with no increase of traction.

The rear tyre disperses heat under the power of the drive train so that it's temperature can remain in this 'sweet spot'. Larger bikes produce more heat and friction therefore needing a bigger tyre. Smaller bikes don't so they don't need a big tyre. This is why front tyres don't differ as much in size, because they are not under pressure from the drive train. You'll find the actual contact patch on the road is quite similar between different tyre sizes, providing the bike's set up correctly.

Putting a larger tyre on a small bike would just reduce the overall temperature of the rubber = less traction, stability of the bike, make it heavier and less aerodynamic. So if you're running out of grip it's probably going to be one of the other things I mentioned, not the size of the tyre :)

I'm talking about the wet...the thinner tyre is going to be better in adverse conditions for a new learner like Rimon. See motorcycle section in this wiki:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aquaplaning

These advantages diminish on lighter motorcycles with naturally wide tires, like those in the supersport class.

Supersport is 600cc. Light bike, wide tyre. So this 'dimishing' is only specific to this kind, and probably not by much. You said 'the wider the tyre the worse it makes you in the wet' but it's more about matching the weight to the width of the tyre, like the Wikipedia article states.

Most likely the bike won't be the thing to make the major difference in this situation. Learn to control a rear wheel slide and that may save you.

Edited by JEPPE

This guy explains it better than me:

http://indianmotosblog.com/aquaplaning

Case in point, Rimon thought that bigger tyres on a bigger bike would be safer to ride with, not always the case.

Congrats Rimon. One day or two? www.bikesales.com.au :thumbsup:

lol... I read the first line. 'Monsoon time in India'. I don't think we'll be getting those conditions here.

Motorcycle Weight: Lighter motorcycles are likely to hydroplane more than heavy motorcycles. More weight causes the tires to stay in contact with the road and clear out water more easily.

Like the wikipedia article said, 600cc bikes are more likely to plane because they are lighter plus they have wider tyres.

So you should be encouraging him to not buy a 600. Only a 1000 or 250/125.

This guy explains it better than me:

http://indianmotosblog.com/aquaplaning

Case in point, Rimon thought that bigger tyres on a bigger bike would be safer to ride with, not always the case.

Congrats Rimon. One day or two? www.bikesales.com.au :thumbsup:

thanks was a 1 day course. money first then bikesales lol

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've looked up the parts number (41011AL501). It's around $700 OEM. Usually our Infiniti G35 here in Canada have interchangeable parts with my Stagea but the parts number are not the same. I have looked around and it seems the JDM 2005 V35 Skyline (which is the same as our G35) has the same caliper but I cannot confirm. And I can't find a repair kit. The inner brake pads drags on the rotor, seems to be rusty piston. Thanks for the info by the way
    • This coupled with 6-9 speed autos with ridiculously short gearing is why these modern shitbox cars always seem so fast off the line. If it wasn't for those things, Raptors would not seem fast. The problem we have is there is a driveability gap between a more gentle take off and a wheelspinning sideways launch. The difference between ankle flex required to achieve one and ankle flex required to achieve the other is about 0.5°.
    • Yeah I think I'm also with the opposite here. It's 'hard to keep up with traffic' because in the real world I'm accelerating with 15% throttle and they are pinning it. It feels like I'm being an overt dickhead at anything above 15% throttle, so the car sounds like I'm being an overt dickhead to keep up with/get ahead of traffic when I'm really just trying to drive with traffic. There would be no issue 'keeping up with traffic' if we used the same level of throttle input/aggression to drive around. People really do just drive around with their foot nearly pinned in econoboxes.
    • To be fair it's the other way around. 300kw is boring in a modern Golf or BMW. They are so competent / well-engineered / devoid of emotion that you have to go stupid fast to feel anything. Whereas the <300kw RB still makes all the right noises and it feels good to drive. Can pull off at the lights with the turbo whooshing and the blow-off pssshing and feel like the coolest kid on the block. Just don't look to the side where you'll see the bored housewifes in their shitbox Yaris/Corolla/Camry that kept up because you didn't go fast at all
    • 300kW is so boring in a Skyline, you'll get spanked by someone's mum's Golf with Alibaba pipes, and an email tune.
×
×
  • Create New...