Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

cams arent required, the engine makes heaps of torque in the midrange and cams just take away a bit of down low to give it a little more torque up top.

that was my thinking.... but how much loss for how much gain is the question.....

with the 8mr turbo it'll still be responsive enough to cope with the loss i'm guessing. and they definitely sound cool as mentioned, but it's probably not worth the $$$ for what like 10kw?

Response aye.. I hold the secret answer! :P

Nah but srs cams are cool

you do realise you aren't the first person ever to run a PD blower dont you? :P

you dont have to use tags, you just fail at pasting the links in the correct way.

that honda sounds more like its running rotational idle rather than cams.

thats with standard cams.

cycle idle / rotational idle is the ducks nuts... vipec/link does it so i'm surprised we dont see it in skylines more often....

that was my thinking.... but how much loss for how much gain is the question.....

with the 8mr turbo it'll still be responsive enough to cope with the loss i'm guessing. and they definitely sound cool as mentioned, but it's probably not worth the $$$ for what like 10kw?

With cams (depending on the lobe design/size) I think people need to see it as less down low and more up top + less traffic diveability.

Is that cycle idle thing the same as antilag?

no, however it is often used in conjunction.

car idles a little higher and drops a different cylinder on each rotation, hence cooling them

it's only used during idle and stops when the revs increase

a lot of them feel like that HAVE to find something, so you chuck in a broken parker light or so on, and they get to fail you, and then you can just change it out and they will pass it

Gmail saved my ass yet again.

"You have used the word attachment but have not attached anything. Were you supposed to upload an attachment?"

Yes, yes I was. :technology-these-days:

I guess that's one benefit of google harvesting information from your email address. In the end they make money from your data.

I think they got in trouble couple months ago for having google ads linked to keywords in emails lol

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The attached document is fine. I just downloaded & opened it.
    • Hello, sorry for being late to join the discussion, but my clock just died on me.   Ive tried to look at Michaels digital clock repair.docx and it doesnt work maybe the file has expired.   Please let me know if you can re upload it or take some youtube videos to show us how to get the clock installed? thanks
    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
×
×
  • Create New...