Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

^ i dont think its as simple as that...

to be honest, he probably thought it wasn't.... but in reality it actually is

VWL whiskey contingent... From the spirits room at Harrod's

pfffft they had that at Dans

  • Like 1

VWL whiskey contingent... From the spirits room at Harrod's

would taste good with LA Ice Cola

It is selfish. Mental issues or not, the kid has no father now and this is a direct result of his father's actions. A man is his own choices. Who can you blame but him?

Suicide is a selfish act, but to assume and generalise such an incident is the kind of bigotry beyond blue are trying to prevent (as well as suicidal thoughts too).

is someone to blame if he had committed suicide because his child had died?

you are putting it in the same category as the man who threw his child off the west gate. and they are totally not comparable.

anyway, the article was posted to help raise awareness in homes and workplaces, not to play the blame game.

would taste good with LA Ice Cola

Suicide is a selfish act, but to assume and generalise such an incident is the kind of bigotry beyond blue are trying to prevent (as well as suicidal thoughts too).

is someone to blame if he had committed suicide because his child had died?

you are putting it in the same category as the man who threw his child off the west gate. and they are totally not comparable.

anyway, the article was posted to help raise awareness in homes and workplaces, not to play the blame game.

How am I putting it in a category with old mate who played a high stakes game of midget tossing? You just did that, not me lol

And yes. If he committed suicide because his child died, he is to blame for his suicide. A man is his own actions. Life can be downright shit at times but you always have a choice in how you play those cards. Even with a gun to your head you have a choice to fight back or resign yourself to death. Don't mistake this for me not feeling sorry for the guy in the article, I do, but I refuse to look past the fact he put his own personal issues and suffering above those of his kid and entire family...and that he couldn't see a way out. He's either selfish or a dumbass or both...I do think the latter.

The depressed and the dead need not be sacred and exempt from the harsh truth that is some people are not fit for this world. Truth be told a lot of people are kept alive by our attempts to combat evolutionary theory and "survival of the fittest" with things like centrelink etc.

On the subject of fifo workers, is there such thing as fifo personal trainers/fitness instructers?

Yeah, work for 2 weeks then call in sick for 2 weeks, do that multiple times :P

I say if you had a kid you shouldn't be working FIFO in the first place; dumb shit.

I disagree with this on so many levels I barely know where to start.

lets just go with this to start with.

Growing up my Dad was a dairy farmer.

he would work 5:30am to 6:30 pm 7 days a week 365 days a year.

as kids we would go to sleep around 8-8:30

so we would see him to max 2 hours a day completely exhausted.

so 28 hours per fortnight.

my brother in law is a foreman for a mine FIFO

1 week on 1 week off.

so he does not see his child for 1 week, then comes home and spends he every waking moment with her for the next week.

so say 12ish waking hours a day..for 7 days.

84ish hours of non exhausted time per fortnight.

so him being "a dumb shit" is nearly tripling his time with his kid.

he can be there for 1/2 of his kids sporting events school events and such more than I can say for any farmer I know.

in fact nearly any self employed people

so does this mean no farmer should be having a kid?

(also a reason that farmers have one of the highest suicide rates of all http://www.huffingtonpost.com/terezia-farkas/why-farmer-suicide-rates-_1_b_5610279.html)

I just think that there too much hate for FIFO and people just don't understand it.

  • Like 1

You make it sound like he was forced to work FIFO?

Regular appearances, even if less time spent with the kid overall, are more important than the long absences in his life - this kid has the equivalent of divorced parents with custody visits because he was away for 4 weeks and then spent 1 week with his kid. Also keeping in mind his kid probably had school or kinder too, and also keeping in mind most people's jobs aren't farmers. You can take time out of a regular job to see your kid or attend events if you have to. FIFO you're stuck there for weeks unless it's an emergency you have to fly home for.

And he obviously didn't have enough time spent with his family for him, hence he necked himself.

I don't see why there's an argument when the article that was posted here was full of support for the notion that it's not the kind of work a family man should be doing, and that even single men should be careful about their mental stability when pursuing that style of work.

Nah I disagree, It's just our media hating on mining FIFO

Farmers in au 150K+

FIFO expected to hit 63K 2015.

who get more attention and hate?

add to that look at the source

a new limited paper, ie hearld sun equiv in WA.

basically they hate the fact some-one earns more than then so tried to make the rest of the population feel better about themselves.

not spotting the same articles about, IT consultants, those that do contracts in places like UAE/kuwait, and for that matter pilots.

all who probably spend longer from home

anyhow I'm stopping now as just over this topic.

  • Like 1

I don't think anyone is hating on FIFO? They just doing a devils advocate article warning people it's not all it's cracked up to be, which is only the other side of the story that we've been hearing for years, i.e. jump ship to WA and you can make a shit ton of cash. I say just journalists looking for a story relevant to modern times cause FIFO is often talked about and everyone knows someone doing it; I doubt they have a personal vendetta about the subject matter. I said it before and I'll say it again, there's a reason people doing the work get paid a lot of money - it's not cause they were lucky enough to stumble across the greatest job in the world. More power to those who work it and feel it is, though.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...